I tend to agree.Pollard was their best or second best player on the team. They tagged him so they wouldn’t lose him. To my knowledge they can still sign him to a favorable deal but I’d rather he tag. Thought tagging him was smart.
I agree. It’s a little steep but you can get away with overpaying a guy here or there. The problem comes when the whole team is overpaid and then issues arise.I tend to agree.
We had 2 playmakers on Offense last season, CD and TP.
He's more than just a running back IMO and we needed him back.
Now, I hope MM uses him better than Moore did.
Not bashing Moore, just feel Pollard could be utilized more as a weapon all over the field, and generally, he was not under Moore, who preferred longer, come back routes.
Still think we could work out a longer term deal and lower his cap hit this year, but the Tag can hold him in place for now.
Sounds like we disagree then.Pollard was their best or second best player on the team. They tagged him so they wouldn’t lose him. To my knowledge they can still sign him to a favorable deal but I’d rather he tag. Thought tagging him was smart.
It was smart but whether we should’ve did it or not is the question we won’t know until next season.Sounds like we disagree then.
You thought wrong as usualPollard was their best or second best player on the team. They tagged him so they wouldn’t lose him. To my knowledge they can still sign him to a favorable deal but I’d rather he tag. Thought tagging him was smart.
Visionary....the visionless one. Never actually says anything just disagrees lol. Visionary.You thought wrong as usual