From Cover Zero to Cover 4, in images.

dwmyers

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,373
Reaction score
522
This isn't everything about pass defense but it's a start.

The blog article is here: http://codeandfootball.wordpress.com/2013/07/04/from-cover-0-to-cover-4-in-images/

Cover Zero

Cover zero implies everyone has a man to man assignment and there is no free safety. Good for blitzes. Bad if your opponent is named Bob Hayes. Front in use is the Tampa Under.

cover_zero_tampa_under_front.jpg


Man Free

"One free" or "man free" was called by Dr Z the purest form of man to man. If you're a great cover safety, you might double the most dangerous man on the field, or if you're Larry Wilson, maybe you just safety blitz every so often. The front is the Miami 4-3 (4-3 slide, 4-3 stack, etc).

miami_or_slide_43_shade_front_man_coverage.jpg


Cover 1

Mostly man-to-man, but with guaranteed deep help from a safety. Miami 43 shade front.

miami_or_slide_43_shade_front_man_coverage_plus_cover_1.jpg


Cover 2

If you have ever heard of the phrase "double zone", then Cover 2 is the original double zone. There are resources that say that the 1963 Bears used a double zone and confused everyone in their day (people back then only used rotating zones, if that).

Important in the Cover and Tampa 2 are the jam by the corners up front. It slows the receivers.

cover_2_slide_43_shade_front.jpg


If you have a fast, agile middle linebacker, the defense invented by Bud Carson and named after Tony Dungy's Tampa Bay Buccaneers offers better deep protection down the middle.

Tampa 2

Tampa 2 with a Tampa under 4-3 front.

tampa_43_under_tampa_2_dev.jpg


Cover 3, rotating and modern.

Back in the days of the Vince Lombardi sweep, this was simply called "zone defense". In the modern context, it's a rotating zone with a Cover 3 back end. It was good for blanketing one good receiver. The Baltimore Colts were good at this. Joe Namath was good at diagnosing it. Joe sent Don Maynard deep early in SB III, and the Colts conveniently rotated towards Don. That, I suggest, was a mistake.

The front in this example is Tom Landry's original 4-3, a 4-3 inside/outside.

tl_43_inside_rotating_zone.jpg


The ease with which the rotating zone was diagnosed led to it disappearing.

The modern Cover 3 is often associated with three deep defensive backs, and 3 Dbs are often seen with that is called the overshifted secondary. One safety will fall to linebacker depth. This safety is often called a monster or rover back (If you've ever heard the phrase 5-2 monster, this is where it comes from).

The front here is the 4-3 Stack (i.e. Miami 4-3), with a safety at linebacker depth (a 4-4 setup). This is a favorite of Ron Vanderlinden, a coach who was the defensive coordinator at Penn State.

cover_3_from_stack_43_monster.jpg


QQH coverage (quarters - quarters - half)

Another look with 3 defensive backs is quarters - quarters - half coverage. You can use this to crowd a team that is flooding one side of the field. Because it is also suitable for use with a 3 deep backfield, we show it out of the overshifted 4-3 Stack.

qqh_coverage_from_stack_43_monster.jpg


Cover 4

A kind of prevent, shown from a Tampa under front.

cover_4_from_tampa_43_under.jpg
 

Staggerlee

chip_gilkey
Messages
2,671
Reaction score
257
I could be wrong here but if I'm an offense facing the modern cover 3 as diagrammed in the pic, I'd be throwing quick outs, comebacks, and fades to the Z all day. Eventually the SAM would get too aggressive and thats when you burn him.

Either that or just have the X drive the corner all the way to the edge of his zone and have the A run a choice route (probably an out) behind him.
 

dwmyers

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,373
Reaction score
522
I could be wrong here but if I'm an offense facing the modern cover 3 as diagrammed in the pic, I'd be throwing quick outs, comebacks, and fades to the Z all day. Eventually the SAM would get too aggressive and thats when you burn him.

Either that or just have the X drive the corner all the way to the edge of his zone and have the A run a choice route (probably an out) behind him.

One thing I'll note is that an overshifted secondary plus cover 3 leaves a team with the same holes an old rotated zone does, on the side away from the overshift. Almost any pure three deep zone will have a hole in the short zones, if you only have seven players in the pass defense.
 

Afigueroa22

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,307
Reaction score
470
Cover 4 when offense has two backs and a TE? Must be from a page in Ryan's playbook.
 

Rack

Federal Agent
Messages
23,906
Reaction score
3,106
Cover 4 when offense has two backs and a TE? Must be from a page in Ryan's playbook.

Was thinking the same thing. Also wondering why you'd keep 7 in the box vs 4 WR's. I understand it's just for illustration purposes though.
 

dwmyers

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,373
Reaction score
522
Was thinking the same thing. Also wondering why you'd keep 7 in the box vs 4 WR's. I understand it's just for illustration purposes though.

I can certainly see why a cover 3 of this kind:

Cover_3_33stack.PNG


might be preferable. But I was working these images up in anticipation of a Wikipedia rewrite, and 5 man defensive backfields get classified as nickels.

D-
 
Top