Robinson was not buying into what the team was trying to do. It had nothing to do with money why he was let go. He was a locker room malcontent.bbgun said:... found the money for Price but not Robinson. Bad move so far.
VirusX said:It wasnt the money it was the roster spot. Thank Tyson for that one
The night before the Cardinals pre season game I took Dale and AdButcher out to eat. Dale told us that Robinson was really arrogant and openly scoffs at a lot of instructions.Rack said:Hostile, where did you hear this? This is the first I've ever heard anything like that.
Parcells couldn't stand Robinson I guess. Dale mentioned something along the lines of he was the last of the guys not buying into the system.Rack said:Well, I don't know if that qualifies him for "Malcontent" status. He's an a-hole. It's ok as long as he's not an a-hole of TO proportions.
I think it was a money issue that he is gone. We had a good young snapper NOW so why not keep him when you can since Robinson is gone next year anyway? Now we have some money to sign someone incase of emergency or to extend a couple of contracts in the middle to end of the season.
Hostile said:Parcells couldn't stand Robinson I guess. Dale mentioned something along the lines of he was the last of the guys not buying into the system.
If Dale wishes he can correct me if my interpretation is off.Alexander said:Interesting.
First time I have heard this anywhere.
But what kind of "system" do you have to buy into when your job is hiking the ball between your legs?
What?Hostile said:As for the "sytem" I think it is just doing things Parcells way.
bbgun said:You people are delusional. Evey report out of Dallas said the impetus for Robinson's release was that it would save the Boys one million dollars. Period. Who truly believes that Condo won it based on ability?
Alexander said:What?
Coach Parcells wanted him to grip the ball a certain way?
I still recall him saying once either last year or the year before that there were several players who were "safe" and he was one of them.
I don't get it and I really hope this decision does not come back to haunt us as it did when Hellestrae left.
Alexander said:What?
Coach Parcells wanted him to grip the ball a certain way?
I still recall him saying once either last year or the year before that there were several players who were "safe" and he was one of them.
I don't get it and I really hope this decision does not come back to haunt us as it did when Hellestrae left.
Alexander said:But what about Mr. LongSnapper or whatever it was called?
I think he wanted him to pay attentionin meetings, not disrupt things, etc.Alexander said:What?
Coach Parcells wanted him to grip the ball a certain way?
I still recall him saying once either last year or the year before that there were several players who were "safe" and he was one of them.
I don't get it and I really hope this decision does not come back to haunt us as it did when Hellestrae left.
Hostile said:If Dale wishes he can correct me if my interpretation is off.
Last year Parcells hoped Landon Trusty would take Robinson's job. Remember he was left home at one point? It didn't happen and he was the LS again.
In other words, as good as he was, Parcells wanted someone else. From what I understand the reason is his attitude.
As for the "sytem" I think it is just doing things Parcells way.
You're right he did say his job was safe at one point. Then he left him at home. Why?
He was. DeHaven was really high on him too. That was why we kept him on the Practice Squad all last year. They hoped he'd develop enough to take Robinson's job.Rack said:I have no recollection (sp?) of trusty even being a long snapper. I can't remember anything about him being in camp as a snapper.
Sorry Rack, you're recollection is off. He left him home last year which is the year he made the comment about TE and LS being the only safe positions. If you remember that was after 2003, his first year here. 2004 was his 2nd year here and he made no such promises. This is year 3.Yeah he left him at home... over a year after making the "safe" comment.
I'm gonna believe Dale on this one. He called the release before PS was even over. In fact, he called it before we'd even played one PS game.Robinson was cut due to his salary and the fact that we had a potentially good replacment in Condo. Sure he's struggling, it's what rookies do.
I think Robinson could have still been here if one of the 3 Long Snappers that were getting reps hadn't given us enough reason to let him go. How then is it about salary? Especially given the fact we're $5M under the cap roughly?IMO, if we hadn't signed Condo, Robinson would still be here.
Couldn't agree with you more on this.That said, I'm fine with the decision. Anyone that expected Condo to come in and do as good as Robinson from the start had unrealistic expectations of the kid in the first place. Just cuz he's playing long snapper doesn't mean he won't make rookie mistakes.