Fuzzy Game Thoughts vs PHI

Wood

Well-Known Member
Messages
8,447
Reaction score
5,697
I have read about people complaining about playcalling but to my eyes it looked like a series of bad individual performances was the real issue. While Murray was able to only gain 3.7 ypc that was due to poor blocking particularly from the left side.

The defense still fails to cover routes run into zone coverages particularly underneath and a lack of team speed was on full display.


Garrett and company got outcoached and outmaneuvered. Spillman, Wilber, Heath, Hitchens, Hayden, Smith, Leary, Hanna, and Romo were all targeted successfully and exploited resulting in the butt whopping we all watched.

I really couldn't have said it better. I am glad you pointed out the lack of team speed as that's what really jumped out at me. As I said on another post....I don't care what they players are doing in non-divisional games. For me it comes down to their performance in divisional games as its often personal. We found out that Dallas can't fight from their backs in Skins and now Eagles game. Bad performances from Leary, Hitchens, Carter and even Romo were really disappointing.
 

lothos05

Active Member
Messages
99
Reaction score
204
The defense still fails to cover routes run into zone coverages particularly underneath and a lack of team speed was on full display.

Rolando looked like much of our defense: slow. He gave good effort but the eagles did a good job getting guards onto him and he was forever on the chase. He was not prepared to cover routes into his zone.

Hitchens was targeted and exploited in the run and pass all game long. He was dominated against Celek and the OG at the poa. Blown off the ball and gave up huge runs. They ran routes at him continually and he failed to keep up with Celek on a crossing route giving up a TD. He gave up another big play on the Bruce Carter special being baited underneath and giving up a play over the top

Carter was playing scared and uncertain once again. You cannot do that against runs up the middle and sharp off tackle. Instead of filling holes he was a step slow. He came closest to executing his zones but failed to makes plays on the ball.

I really look forward to and appreciate your write-ups, Fuzzy!

I see quite a bit of comments saying that we are a better man team than zone. I always thought that the inability to be effective in a zone was on the DBs but it appears that it's on the LBs. It seems to be a lack of preparation rather than a lack of talent, correct?

Also, what does a LB do when he "buzzes" a route?
 

FuzzyLumpkins

The Boognish
Messages
36,574
Reaction score
27,856
I was wondering why Spillman got so many snaps. wouldve liked to see my boy Hamilton..see what hes got.. every1 should know spillman is just a special teams player

I am with you. Special teams needs Spillman and they did okay there outside of a punt in the second half. I expect you don't want Heath out there either. I know I don't.

Losing Patmon hurts. He is good at underneath coverage. Great anticipation and is very quick. He can do as well as Scandrick in the run.
 

FuzzyLumpkins

The Boognish
Messages
36,574
Reaction score
27,856
I really look forward to and appreciate your write-ups, Fuzzy!

I see quite a bit of comments saying that we are a better man team than zone. I always thought that the inability to be effective in a zone was on the DBs but it appears that it's on the LBs. It seems to be a lack of preparation rather than a lack of talent, correct?

Also, what does a LB do when he "buzzes" a route?

In the cover 3 the corner tries to stay on top of the WR and never let them upfield of him. You can run a 2 or deep zone on that side of the field. You use a nickel, LB or S to get outside and up to sit underneath in a bracket looking for comebacks and ins to run under. You are supposed to be looking for routes coming from the middle of the field too. TE coming up the hash or on the post for example. It's led to a few 5 int games from Romo. Problem is we don't often see our inside guys running under routes.

We need better athletes at FS and LB.
 

MichaelWinicki

"You want some?"
Staff member
Messages
47,997
Reaction score
27,917
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
In the cover 3 the corner tries to stay on top of the WR and never let them upfield of him. You can run a 2 or deep zone on that side of the field. You use a nickel, LB or S to get outside and up to sit underneath in a bracket looking for comebacks and ins to run under. You are supposed to be looking for routes coming from the middle of the field too. TE coming up the hash or on the post for example. It's led to a few 5 int games from Romo. Problem is we don't often see our inside guys running under routes.

We need better athletes at FS and LB.

Or at least guys that have better instincts when playing in zone coverage.
 

lothos05

Active Member
Messages
99
Reaction score
204
In the cover 3 the corner tries to stay on top of the WR and never let them upfield of him. You can run a 2 or deep zone on that side of the field. You use a nickel, LB or S to get outside and up to sit underneath in a bracket looking for comebacks and ins to run under. You are supposed to be looking for routes coming from the middle of the field too. TE coming up the hash or on the post for example. It's led to a few 5 int games from Romo. Problem is we don't often see our inside guys running under routes.

We need better athletes at FS and LB.

Thanks for the explanation, Fuzzy! Trying to learn the game better rather than just keeping my eye on the football.

IIRC, the Eagles hurt us a few times running Jordan Matthews across the middle--especially on that touchdown. I had to go look at it again but both McClain and Hitchens cheated towards the line of scrimmage and Matthews ran right behind them for a TD.
 

Risen Star

Likes Collector
Messages
89,454
Reaction score
212,385
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
I really couldn't have said it better. I am glad you pointed out the lack of team speed as that's what really jumped out at me. As I said on another post....I don't care what they players are doing in non-divisional games. For me it comes down to their performance in divisional games as its often personal. We found out that Dallas can't fight from their backs in Skins and now Eagles game. Bad performances from Leary, Hitchens, Carter and even Romo were really disappointing.

I'll be honest. I didn't foresee Hitchens struggling. That rocked me.

But hey, sometimes great players have bad games.
 

FuzzyLumpkins

The Boognish
Messages
36,574
Reaction score
27,856
All I know is what I look for in a backup DE in a 4-3 defense is a guy who can't get to the QB.

Superb.

He was playing Jason Peters. He has good games and bad games depending on the competition.

Even when he didn't generate much rush, he did hold up against the run. They didn't have much luck running against he and Crawford and they ran a lot.

To me that is an ideal backup. Can start in a pinch and compete with NFL starters else fill in 20 or so snaps primarily on first and second downs. I want my top rushers playing lions share of the the nickel snaps. Those would be starters as opposed to backups.

You guys get it now? You guys should call me an impartial homer now. That would be fun.
 

Doc50

Original Fan
Messages
3,142
Reaction score
3,430
I have read about people complaining about playcalling but to my eyes it looked like a series of bad individual performances was the real issue. While Murray was able to only gain 3.7 ypc that was due to poor blocking particularly from the left side.

The defense still fails to cover routes run into zone coverages particularly underneath and a lack of team speed was on full display.

The OL was at best a mixed bag. Both Leary and Smith were bad and appear hurt. Smith failed to reach blocks, seemed weak at the poa and was pressing to the point it created problems.

Leary was god awful for all of some fans excuse making. He missed several blocks on first half runs fail to block anyone on the second level multiple times. He followed that up by being a sieve for Fletcher Cox in the nickel. He whiffed horribly on simple inside out moves and gave up sacks on consecutive plays in the 3rd when we finally abandoned the run. After that they gave him help but he continued to struggle and failed to block anyone allowing pressure into his A and B gap on stunts and blitzes. When Leary is on he is a mauling force but this game saw him as bad or worse as Chicago or Detroit last year.

Fred was up and down. He lost his feet a couple times trying to reach blocks and led to negative runs and screwed up the snap count leading to a sack but he also was dominant at the poa a few times springing runs in the first half.

Martin was once again dominant at the poa and on the move. I think it makes sense next year flipping guards and having Leary closer to potential help of the strongside. Martin seems better suited to matchup with the league's various 3 techniques on a consistent basis.

Free was consistent in reaching his blocks and executing but as usual he doesn't have great power to tryuly be a difference maker. When he is the worst player on the line it's great. When the left side plays as it did then that is another story.

Romo got freaked out after the left side caved and poor pass protection was once again a serious issue. We can make noise all we want about how Callahan has done wonders for the run game but his pass protection has been spotty all year. Romo was not particularly accurate to begin with but soon he was throwing off balance on his front or back foot and plain running for his life. The interceptions were bad but he was clearly impacted by the pass rush we couldn't block very well.

Murray ran hard but left yards out there trying to make a play. Cannot fault his effort though. While much of the skill position players came in soft and half asleep, he came to play from the opening. Randle and Dunbar looked very good with quickness to the line and determined running.

Dez made plays and kept his cool for what must have surely been a frustrating game for him. He fought for passes and kept trying to make plays when the offense was clearly struggling in the second half. Williams finally decided to play with a bit more urgency at the end but by then it was out of reach. His soft route running has become a problem.

Beasley can get open easily against most coverages in the NFL. He is an asset. The fumble he had saw him moving the ball from the inside to outside arm and the LB made a good play. That being said that is no excuse; if he is going to fumble then he needs cover with both hands and get down. That fumble in the second quarter was a back breaker.

Witten continues to block well at the poa but its hard to evaluate route running with the telecast. Hanna and Escobar got pushed around and didn't hold LB blocks particularly well. Hanna was particularly disappointing

Defense was not good. Selvie is okay but he lacks quickness and was exploited. He is a solid backup but marginal starter. He did make a few plays and pressures but also failed at the poa and was a nonfactor at other times.

Nick Hayden just pisses me off now. He saw one double team and blown off the ball but for the most part he saw single blocking and was dominated. It's entirely too easy to hook and seal him leaving a big fat lane. The Eagles ran at him and Selvie a lot and it worked. Seeing him in on the nickle at this point really really really makes me mad. He makes no plays and gets no push. I fail to see the point of him outside of making line calls and chasing down plays 10 yards downfield.

Crawford was a bright spot and was able to beat Mathis several times. He did a good job penetrating and getting off blocks all game long. Mincey struggled to get away from Peters all game long. He is another who is a marginal starter but superb backup.

Spencer was quick and did a good job chasing down the line and getting off blocks. His pass rush wasn't dominant but it did move Sanchez off his spot and force throws. Problem is that the Hayden single block and double on the 3 tech left a nice pocket to step into.

T McClain plays a bit out of control. He is quick upfield and disruptive but he doesn't maintain control and cannot finish. Melton didn't play much and got a LOT of attention when he did.

Lawrence saw a lot of runs and held his own at the poa. He uses his arms to his advantage. His pass rush moves are unrefined to say that least and his handwork is a work in progress. Lack of training camp impacted him severely.

WIlber didn't see much action in the first half. We played a lot of Heath at nickel LB with Spillman andWilcox behind. When Wilber was in he wasn't effective.

Rolando looked like much of our defense: slow. He gave good effort but the eagles did a good job getting guards onto him and he was forever on the chase. He was not prepared to cover routes into his zone.

Hitchens was targeted and exploited in the run and pass all game long. He was dominated against Celek and the OG at the poa. Blown off the ball and gave up huge runs. They ran routes at him continually and he failed to keep up with Celek on a crossing route giving up a TD. He gave up another big play on the Bruce Carter special being baited underneath and giving up a play over the top

Carter was playing scared and uncertain once again. You cannot do that against runs up the middle and sharp off tackle. Instead of filling holes he was a step slow. He came closest to executing his zones but failed to makes plays on the ball.

Church looks slow and they ran right at him in the nickel and he caved. Did okay chasing off the back end but he cannot get outside to the sideline on deep throws when taking a deep drop. Was pushed around on teams as well.

Wilcox was up and down but he was relentless and aggressive. His play in the second quarter was inspiring and got some stops but the offense's turnovers made it all for naught. He did make some mistakes in coming up too aggressively and taking bad angles but he continues to make plays and I expect those bad decisions to become less and less as he gains experience. He can get to the sideline and he likes to hit.

Spillman got plenty of time and was targeted and exploited as well. He lacks awareness and doesn't anticipate throws or routes into his zone. Sanchez was not scared to throw into the middle of the field due to atrocious coverage from LB and S.

Corners were okay. Carr is a favorite whipping boy but outside of the in route off cover 3 he was fine. He is not equipped to play that coverage well especially with LB who don't know how to buzz routes worth a flip.

Scandrick was flattened in the run game multiple times and surrendered crossing routes.

Moore was consistent in coverage and made plays the few times he was thrown on.

Garrett and company got outcoached and outmaneuvered. Spillman, Wilber, Heath, Hitchens, Hayden, Smith, Leary, Hanna, and Romo were all targeted successfully and exploited resulting in the butt whopping we all watched.

It's really troubling to see the Cowboys failing to make adjustments on both sides of the ball, and failing to exploit the opponents' sets and weaknesses.

There was a story last week about how successful the aged coaching staff is at Arizona.
The Dallas staff also has loads of experience, and JJ can put as much non-cap money into this as possible. Yet we seem to be countering (poorly) other coaches' moves instead of dictating the strategy ourselves and forcing the opponent to adapt.

We have been a one-trick OL/ ground game pony, despite our wealth of other weapons. We have not exploited blitzes with screens and quick routes and draws. We have not used Escobar, Hanna, Harris, and Beasley enough; have not thrown off the 12 sets enough.

The only explanation I can conceive to explain the lack of diversity and creativity is that it's being saved for the play-offs.
I'd say they better open it up now, or there may be no playoffs.
 

xwalker

Well-Known Member
Messages
57,202
Reaction score
64,708
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
Anybody else want to play 'Catch with a Turd' or is it just going to be Risen and Alexander today? Or are the rest of us going to just focus on all the good content Fuzzy provided, again?

I'm hoping the latter.

Aren't they really the same person?
 

xwalker

Well-Known Member
Messages
57,202
Reaction score
64,708
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
Nick Hayden just pisses me off now. He saw one double team and blown off the ball but for the most part he saw single blocking and was dominated. It's entirely too easy to hook and seal him leaving a big fat lane. The Eagles ran at him and Selvie a lot and it worked. Seeing him in on the nickle at this point really really really makes me mad. He makes no plays and gets no push. I fail to see the point of him outside of making line calls and chasing down plays 10 yards downfield.

Spillman got plenty of time and was targeted and exploited as well. He lacks awareness and doesn't anticipate throws or routes into his zone. Sanchez was not scared to throw into the middle of the field due to atrocious coverage from LB and S.
IMO, Hayden is a big cause for the failure of the defense. When the 1-tech can't draw a double team or gets blown out if he does, then it throws off the entire DLine. If the DLine is off that throws off the rest of the defense. The LBs are seeing extra blockers on their level in the run game and the lack of pass rush obviously is bad for the secondary.

I'm ready to see if Josh Brent has anything. The early 2012 version of Josh Brent would definitely draw double teams.

If Crawford and Melton can't play all of the snaps in the Nickel, I think T. McClain is a better pass rusher than Hayden.

I appreciate that Hayden is Mr. Hustle, but it's just not enough to overcome his lack of talent.
 

DandyDon1722

It's been a good 'un, ain't it?
Messages
6,386
Reaction score
7,008
Thanks Fuzz - hey, I saw this quote by Garrett, after watching the tape, do you have any idea who he's talking about--

''I can show you consecutive plays where we executed really well and the same guy did not do what he was supposed to do in the same situation and they really hurt us,'' coach Jason Garrett said.

That's about as 'called out' as you'll get in public by Jason, I'm thinking it was a linebacker who didn't contain - any thoughts?
 

CowboyStar88

Well-Known Member
Messages
23,178
Reaction score
25,570
Thanks Fuzz - hey, I saw this quote by Garrett, after watching the tape, do you have any idea who he's talking about--

''I can show you consecutive plays where we executed really well and the same guy did not do what he was supposed to do in the same situation and they really hurt us,'' coach Jason Garrett said.

That's about as 'called out' as you'll get in public by Jason, I'm thinking it was a linebacker who didn't contain - any thoughts?

I'm thinking JJ Wilcox. He over pursued a few times and if he didn't he was in position to make the play.
 

Crown Royal

Insulin Beware
Messages
14,229
Reaction score
6,383
In the cover 3 the corner tries to stay on top of the WR and never let them upfield of him. You can run a 2 or deep zone on that side of the field. You use a nickel, LB or S to get outside and up to sit underneath in a bracket looking for comebacks and ins to run under. You are supposed to be looking for routes coming from the middle of the field too. TE coming up the hash or on the post for example. It's led to a few 5 int games from Romo. Problem is we don't often see our inside guys running under routes.

We need better athletes at FS and LB.

I would add that the Eagles entire play calling scheme early on was designed around beating cover 3. That's why you saw sproles motioning so many times. They were getting the defense to make a choice - keep your zones deep to keep an intermediate pass out, but that will allow a swing pass to an ultra athletic Sproles who will burn most of our LBers. Or you cover the flat and take away sproles, and we will eat you alive with some ins and come backs.

Add in some terrible contain on off-tackle runs, a disgusting overbite on play action and some poor one on one performances, and we were toast on defense.

I guess what I'm saying is that while I agree with you on the buzz routes, I would say the defense was picking it's poison - don't let Sproles eat you alive and challenge Sanchez. Unfortunately Sanchez is looking like an NFL qb for once.
 

JBell

That's still my Quarterback
Messages
5,699
Reaction score
6,840
Church looks slow and they ran right at him in the nickel and he caved. Did okay chasing off the back end but he cannot get outside to the sideline on deep throws when taking a deep drop. Was pushed around on teams as well.

Wilcox was up and down but he was relentless and aggressive. His play in the second quarter was inspiring and got some stops but the offense's turnovers made it all for naught. He did make some mistakes in coming up too aggressively and taking bad angles but he continues to make plays and I expect those bad decisions to become less and less as he gains experience. He can get to the sideline and he likes to hit.
I appreciate your recaps Fuzzy, they always bring great insight. But I got a bone to pick with you regarding Barry Church.

You're willing to overlook mediocre games by Wilcox and highlight his positives because he's a young guy who hasn't been playing the position very long.

But I don't ever see you give Mr. Church the benefit of the doubt, nor do I see him acknowledged even when he has good games.

I thought he was a catalyst in last week's come from behind win vs. NYG. He had two "splash plays" that I can recall off top, one of which he was robbed of by the refs (the forced fumble on Andre Brown inside the 10). But no mention from you.

Then vs. the Eagles, I thought he was very active around the LOS. He was in on several tackles and did a good job of keeping outside contain from what I recall. He was milliseconds away from creating a huge forced fumble on Shady inside the Cowboys redzone. He also had that four point saving pass deflection on Ertz on 3rd down in the redzone which resulted in a Philly FG.

Give my guy some credit.
 
Top