theogt
Surrealist
- Messages
- 45,846
- Reaction score
- 5,912
Yes, I recognized this after i re-read my post. I'm just too lazy to hit the edit button.fortdick said:Actually, the reader drew the inference
Yes, I recognized this after i re-read my post. I'm just too lazy to hit the edit button.fortdick said:Actually, the reader drew the inference
theogt said:Yes, I recognized this after i re-read my post. I'm just too lazy to hit the edit button.
bbgun said:As the Fonz would say, "Exactamundo." I can't help that he came from Nigeria, nor will I be cowed from pointing out that he did. His origins and inexperience (compared to JJ's) are relevant. Politically correct race hustling has no place on this board.
Well maybe you just shouldn't mention it and all would be fine, no?bbgun said:I know what you were implying, and I don't like it. If he was from France, that would have been noted too.
superpunk said:I believe every single NFL broadcast that I have seen of the Packers has pointed out in some way that he's Nigerian. I fail to see the big deal.
It's one thing to point out where someone is from, it's quite another to use that information as a factor in comparing his performance to that of another player. I don't think the original poster had any racist intent but he surely shouldn't go off the handle when another poster asks for some clarification of the original statement.superpunk said:I believe every single NFL broadcast that I have seen of the Packers has pointed out in some way that he's Nigerian. I fail to see the big deal.
Doomsday101 said:I guess because football is not a big sports in Africa so not many guys from there play professional football.
superpunk said:I believe every single NFL broadcast that I have seen of the Packers has pointed out in some way that he's Nigerian. I fail to see the big deal.
jem88 said:It's one thing to point out where someone is from, it's quite another to use that information as a factor in comparing his performance to that of another player. I don't think the original poster had any racist intent but he surely shouldn't go off the handle when another poster asks for some clarification of the original statement.
JohnsKey19 said:It's not a big deal. Doesn't mean questions can't be asked. I think people were irritated when the perception was racism was implied, when it never was on my part.
bbgun said:The phantom ankle injury/excuse is getting tiresome.
superpunk said:I know why the NFL broadcasters do it. I just don't see why anyone would jump on the guy who started this thread for mentioning the same thing.
Who cares? How many basketball players can you think of who spent a majority of their childhood Italy and then went on to become NBA superstars? I can only think of one. The point is, living in a place until you are eight years is not likely to have a big impact on your future sport endeavours.conner01 said:mr political correctness. being as he is from a country that does'nt play football i see the relavance of using his country of origin.how many nigerians have ever played in the nfl? one is all i can think of.
wileedog said:What other excuse would you like?
Again if the commentators are using that fact as a source of amazement/bemusement/amusement or whatever, then they are bringing up irrelevant information.superpunk said:I don't see why any clarification was necessary. If someone thought it was, the ONLY reason they could possibly want clarification is becasue or some percieved nationalism or racism. I just don't get that, when every NFL broadcast makes mention of the same fact. It's pretty cool that a guy from Nigeria is performing so well. It would be just as cool if some giant white guy from Lithuania became a good WR. I think it's interesting that some guy from Nigeria (again, not known for it's football prowess) is outperforming our ND RB. No reason to even question why he mentioned it.
bbgun said:Because it's clear he wasn't the same player before the injury and before Flo's departure.