Garrett ok with open QB competition?

I can't wait till Tony's winning for another team in 2 years. I can't bare anymore of this crap.
 
I said it back when Martellus opened his mouth originally and I'll say it again. There is *ALWAYS* an open competition. The problem is that no one is good enough to make the competition close enough to pay attention to.
 
SDCowboy85;3945878 said:
I can't wait till Tony's winning for another team in 2 years. I can't bare anymore of this crap.


if he could only win something with this team first
 
theogt;3945882 said:
I said it back when Martellus opened his mouth originally and I'll say it again. There is *ALWAYS* an open competition. The problem is that no one is good enough to make the competition close enough to pay attention to.

Exactly if someone somehow came in and gave romo a run shouldn't he start above romo? Just hasn't happened.
 
theogt;3945882 said:
I said it back when Martellus opened his mouth originally and I'll say it again. There is *ALWAYS* an open competition. The problem is that no one is good enough to make the competition close enough to pay attention to.

Bingo
 
I don't see why this would be bad. If someone else on the roster happens to be better than Romo (which I doubt), then this can only be good news for us. If not, Romo is still the man.
 
So, where is the thread jumping all over Garrett for saying this publicly? Surely we arent so hypocritical that we destroy Martellus Bennett for suggesting open competition but praise Garrett for doing the same?
 
So are all the people who ripped Martellus now going to backtrack since RJ agrees with him?
 
The Quest for Six;3945884 said:
if he could only win something with this team first

Are you gonna troll every thread Romo is mentioned in?
 
The30YardSlant;3945927 said:
So, where is the thread jumping all over Garrett for saying this publicly? Surely we arent so hypocritical that we destroy Martellus Bennett for suggesting open competition but praise Garrett for doing the same?

Chocolate Lab;3945930 said:
So are all the people who ripped Martellus now going to backtrack since RJ agrees with him?

Speaking only for myself, I didn't see anything wrong with Bennett suggesting their be a competition. The rule still applies; if someone is good enough to replace Romo as the starter, then so be it. Until then, this is Romo's team.
 
The30YardSlant;3945927 said:
So, where is the thread jumping all over Garrett for saying this publicly? Surely we arent so hypocritical that we destroy Martellus Bennett for suggesting open competition but praise Garrett for doing the same?

Right, but some people are.
 
zrinkill;3945932 said:
Are you gonna troll every thread Romo is mentioned in?

Why do you ask that? He does it all the time!
:confused:


He's just as bad about slamming Romo as Bach was about slamming Jerry.
 
Chocolate Lab;3945930 said:
So are all the people who ripped Martellus now going to backtrack since RJ agrees with him?

No they won't, but they will have a different spin on it, stating it MB was wrong, but JG meant it a different way.
 
Plumfool;3945889 said:
Exactly if someone somehow came in and gave romo a run shouldn't he start above romo? Just hasn't happened.

Do you seriously think if they found the next roger at rookie min, they would sit Romo and his 60 million price tag.

I agree with the comment, but you know as well as I do they wont sit Romo unless he stinks up the joint. Romo aint that bad to stink up the joint, so I cant see them sitting him while Jerrys writing checks weekly large enough to pay off my house to Romo.

I hear what your saying, you play the best you got. But in the economically minded mind of Jerry, You dont sit 60 million for 180,000.
 
The30YardSlant;3945927 said:
So, where is the thread jumping all over Garrett for saying this publicly? Surely we arent so hypocritical that we destroy Martellus Bennett for suggesting open competition but praise Garrett for doing the same?

I was impressed that Garrett said Marty was right.
 
I'm sure Romo is shaking in his booties. Good thing he has golf to fall back on.
 
Ashwynn;3945944 said:
Do you seriously think if they found the next roger at rookie min, they would sit Romo and his 60 million price tag.

I agree with the comment, but you know as well as I do they wont sit Romo unless he stinks up the joint. Romo aint that bad to stink up the joint, so I cant see them sitting him while Jerrys writing checks weekly large enough to pay off my house to Romo.

I hear what your saying, you play the best you got. But in the economically minded mind of Jerry, You dont sit 60 million for 180,000.

If winning is your goal then yes ya do.
 
JonJon;3945938 said:
Speaking only for myself, I didn't see anything wrong with Bennett suggesting their be a competition. The rule still applies; if someone is good enough to replace Romo as the starter, then so be it. Until then, this is Romo's team.

You were in the minority. Most here just couldnt wait to tell everyone what a trouble maker Bennett was and how awful his comments were and how detrimental they were to the team dynamic.
 
Plumfool;3945949 said:
If winning is your goal then yes ya do.

Again in a perfect world. But Jerry Loves the gunslinger in Romo and probably have Tony Romo on the short list of possible stadium names.
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
474,003
Messages
14,505,684
Members
24,207
Latest member
TomGiantsfan
Back
Top