Giants GM: Plaxico Can Come Back

Nav22

Well-Known Member
Messages
14,449
Reaction score
17,758
REMEMBER THIS THE NEXT TIME A GIANTS FAN RIPS THE COWBOYS FOR BEING "CLASSLESS" OR FOR HARBORING LOW-CHARACTER PLAYERS. :starspin

http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2009/football/nfl/03/03/burress.ap/index.html

EAST RUTHERFORD, N.J. (AP) -- Plaxico Burress could be welcomed back by the New York Giants -- if the Super Bowl star can straighten out his legal problems stemming from a weapons charge and get his life back in order.

"Right now he is still a Giant and if things work out and he's on board with what we want coming back, we'd love to have him back," general manager Jerry Reese said Tuesday.

Burress' future is cloudy because he faces an illegal weapons possession charge relating to a self-inflicted gunshot wound at a New York City nightclub in late November. He faces a mandatory 31/2 years in prison if convicted.

Barring a plea deal, the case is scheduled to return to court at the end of the month.

The 31-year-old, who signed a five-year, $35 million contract in September, also faces a possible suspension by the NFL for violating its personal conduct policy.

Burress, who has been living in New Jersey and Florida in recent months according to teammate Brandon Jacobs, has not commented publicly on his future with the Giants since the shooting.

His agent, Drew Rosenhaus, has refused to respond to at least a two dozen telephone call by The Associated Press seeking comment during that period.

Since the Giants season ended, Reese has left the door open for a potential return by Burress, the only deep threat among their receivers. The team was 11-1 with him in the lineup. It lost four of its final five games after his season-ending suspension, including a 23-11 loss at home to the Philadelphia Eagles in the second round of the playoffs.

Without the threat of Burress beating them, opponents crowded the line of scrimmage and slowed down New York's running game and severely limited its offensive production.

Reese could have made a strong statement that the Giants planned to end their four-year association with Burress by signing a deep-threat receiver when free agency opened last week.

Instead, the Giants turned all their attention to their defense and signed linebacker Michael Boley, defensive end Chris Canty and defensive tackle Rocky Bernard.

Reese also noted that the Giants made a serious offer -- a little less than $80 million -- to former Titans defensive tackle Albert Haynesworth. He added that they did not make an offer to former Bengals receiver T.J. Houshmandzadeh.

Haynesworth signed with Washington for $100 million, while the Seattle Seahawks and Houshmandzadeh agreed on a $40 million deal.

Reese said the Giants still have work to do to get ready for next season.

"We'll still look around in free agency and see if something makes sense for us in free agency," he said. "But the draft is coming up soon and we'll try to supplement with the draft as well, try to fill some holes and just try to draft good players with the draft and try to develop some young people to come into our program and stay strong all around."

New York will probably have at least nine draft picks -- two each in the second and fifth rounds -- in April, giving Reese the chance to package some in a deal to get a higher pick. New York has the 29th pick now.

The Giants are scheduled to begin their offseason training program later this month, but Reese seemed to rule out Burress taking part.

"I'm not sure what will happen," Reese said. "Like I said, there are some legal issues right now, and I think that is the most pressing issue for him. I think he wants to try to get all those things resolved. We'll see what happens as far as offseason stuff goes."

Reese has high hopes for the Giants' young receivers -- Steve Smith, Domenik Hixon, Sinorice Moss and Mario Manningham.

"Who knows who is going to step out of the shadows and be the guy," Reese said. "Again, we'll try to continue to upgrade that spot, but we have good players at that position right now. We can go into the fall with these guys, but we are definitely going to try to continue to upgrade that position."

The Giants and Burress have other issues to settle, resulting from the four-game suspension that team handed him after he shot himself in the right thigh.

The team withheld a $1 million portion of a signing bonus after suspending Burress. He also is looking to recover fines and lost wages resulting from his suspension.

The NFL Players Association has filed two grievances against the Giants on behalf of the receiver.
 

The Panch

New Member
Messages
4,184
Reaction score
0
They're desperate. Their recieving core is garbage. You lose your two best receivers over a one year span(Shockey and Burress) and Mr. Reliable(Toomer) gets gone.
 

Mash

Active Member
Messages
4,062
Reaction score
0
Just amazing...

They get praised by the mediots for suspending Burres but now are willing to welcome Burress back.

Lets see....Burress was fined around 50 times during his stay with the Giants but it was kept hush hush......until they won the SB........then they win...they finally act on suspending Burress and the mediots praise mangement and coaching for it.

Now....because Manning and others complained about not being effective without Burress taking pressure off......Mangement and coaching are throwing the red carpet out for Burress.

I wonder how the mediots will spin this?
 

AMERICAS_FAN

Active Member
Messages
7,198
Reaction score
0
Of course, the Giants and Burress won't get chastised in the media over the news if Burress returs to the NYJ, and that's because the NYJ are not called the Dallas Cowboys and Burress is not called T.O. So if Burress does return to his former team, then I fully expect a national and Dallas-local media outpouring over the "briallinace" of the move. :rolleyes:
 

TellerMorrow34

BraveHeartFan
Messages
28,358
Reaction score
5,076
This isn't a shocking situation considering how piss poor they were offensively without him. I figured they'd let it all go and bring him back.

The question for me, however, is rather or not the league is going to suspend him for some games early in the season for all his off the field stuff lately.
 

jgboys1

Well-Known Member
Messages
6,290
Reaction score
3,103
AMERICAS_FAN;2666729 said:
Of course, the Giants and Burress won't get chastised in the media over the news if Burress returs to the NYG, and that's because the NYG are not called the Dallas Cowboys and Burress is not called T.O. So if Burress does return to his former team, then I fully expect a national and Dallas-local media outpouring over the "briallinace" of the move. :rolleyes:
:hammer:
 

jimmy40

Well-Known Member
Messages
16,866
Reaction score
1,888
We signed pacman and hired babysitters for him, saw him suspended and let him come back. If he didn't suck he'd still be here. We have no room to talk.
 

Apollo Creed

Stackin and Processin, Well
Messages
9,027
Reaction score
1,223
The G-Men without Plax are an ordinary bunch.

No surprise here.
 

Doomsay

Well-Known Member
Messages
10,542
Reaction score
6,160
Apollo Creed;2666948 said:
The G-Men without Plax are an ordinary bunch.

No surprise here.

Last year for sure, especially with a thin DL. Too bad we couldn't take advantage of that or NE missing the playoffs.

Their D will be impressive this year , I think.
 

LittleBoyBlue

Redvolution
Messages
35,766
Reaction score
8,411
BraveHeartFan;2666732 said:
This isn't a shocking situation considering how piss poor they were offensively without him. I figured they'd let it all go and bring him back.

The question for me, however, is rather or not the league is going to suspend him for some games early in the season for all his off the field stuff lately.


WR's do win SB's.

See last two SB's :D
 
Top