Give Me Tyler Warren

[Pass2Run]

Warren was never considered a top 5 prospect. The Atlanta kid was.

I've seen him at 5.

 

[baltcowboy]

I've seen him at 5.

Warren is highly thought of but Kyle Pitts was considered one of best tight end prospects ever. If Tet had Pitts athleticism he would be the 4th pick in this draft. Remember Pitts is a tight end who in college would burn Surtain.

 

[deerhunter11]

Yep. We need better playcalling, a running game, better threats to catch RZ targets, and a better QB

Other than that— we are doing great lol

I agree McCarthy got a little off track with his run game last season.

 

[Rayman70]

Love the player, but TE at 12? Man I doubt this would help us significantly enough.

 

[deerhunter11]

I've seen him at 5.

I have a feeling if Dallas picks at 12 they will draft Warren or Tet , if both players are gone they will trade down and draft Wr Golden or a defensive player.

 

[RonWashington]

Broadus was quoted on a podcast doesn’t think much of Warren .

 

[RonWashington]

I’m not over inflating what was a very disappointing TE position last year and the Cowboys WR room is crowded with one draft pick or trade pick up after another but explain how a defense that was ranked with the bottom feeders of the league doesn’t demand picks 12 & 44 ?

If you step out on to the field and your defense is abused you have no shot at post game glory and breathless interviews by Erin & Tracey about how does it feel to be in first place or headed for the playoffs interviews …

 

[stilltheguru]

Warren is highly thought of but Kyle Pitts was considered one of best tight end prospects ever. If Tet had Pitts athleticism he would be the 4th pick in this draft. Remember Pitts is a tight end who in college would burn Surtain.

People trying to change the narrative about Pitts lol. 99 percent of this board was obsessed with him in 2021.

 

[Acceptablename]

Two Super Bowl teams both have stud TEs. Warren would instantly upgrade your offense to a new level. And, he gives you a RedZone weapon. You know he'll be a super star already. To me, one of the safest picks in the draft.

The more I think about it, the more I think he's the likely pick.

BPA style in the first round. We'd know what we're getting, especially if McMillan is gone.

Warren would be my second choice. This draft is really hard to read. I'm hoping that we can get one of those 70% value trade downs

 

[XXLMike]

Love it

 

[Croomraider]

No way he makes it past 10, we'd have to trade up to 8 or 9 to get him.

 

[75boyz]

Two Super Bowl teams both have stud TEs. Warren would instantly upgrade your offense to a new level. And, he gives you a RedZone weapon. You know he'll be a super star already. To me, one of the safest picks in the draft.

The more I think about it, the more I think he's the likely pick.

BPA style in the first round. We'd know what we're getting, especially if McMillan is gone.

Me and you are in lockstep for most all of our DT views brother but if "another" TE is picked, and especially in the 1st round, I may as well go and buy another remote in advance now.
No to TE, WR or CB.
Yes to DT1, RB1 and DT3.

 

[Pass2Run]

Me and you are in lockstep for most all of our DT views brother but if "another" TE is picked, and especially in the 1st round, I may as well go and buy another remote in advance now.
No to TE, WR or CB.
Yes to DT1, RB1 and DT3.

No RB in round 1 for me. I'd rather get a stud OL. Then again, I like guys like Lundt too, especially as a run blocking OL.

I'm actually hoping it's a stud DT to maximize Parsons.

I also won't be mad if they draft Hairston round 1. But I just really like the player, personally

 

[dstew60105]

Two Super Bowl teams both have stud TEs. Warren would instantly upgrade your offense to a new level. And, he gives you a RedZone weapon. You know he'll be a super star already. To me, one of the safest picks in the draft.

The more I think about it, the more I think he's the likely pick.

BPA style in the first round. We'd know what we're getting, especially if McMillan is gone.

Good lord, no