gtb1943
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 9,081
- Reaction score
- 8,980
Mean has more than one meaning.I'm not sure I agree with calling him mean it was really earning this morning dark outside and he was trying to get to the golf course. He says he didn't know they were the police and even if he did the policeman was dumb for attaching himself to his car just because he ignored his signal, the policeman caused his own harm. That made this way worse than it needed to be because then you know the policeman is going to be extra pissed and will arrest him no matter what. If the policeman didn't do that this was just like a fine for ignoring police instruction now it's assault on a police officer but I don't really agree. A lawyer was on Dan Patrick radio show and he says he thinks the felony will be dropped.
My understanding of his statement was a bit differentMean has more than one meaning.
Outside of that, the claim he did not know they were cops is going to be hard to sell since it all occurred under a fairly bright streetlight from pictures of the scene.
Enough light to see argues that he was badly wrong whatever he claims he sawMy understanding of his statement was a bit different
I thought Scottie said he thought they were waving him through to a different entrance and basically misunderstood the officers intentions
Anyone who doesn’t think there are bad cops out there with a power trip is living in fantasy land.Why would you grab a moving car? That is completely stupid as it wouldn't have any effect on the car.
I had something very similar happen to me. Drove down a street and a police officer came onto the street and told me to stop. I didn't so it instantly so he struck the car with his flashlight on the roof. I still didn't stop right away but drove to the side of the road and stopped there.
He came at me yelling like a madman and I had to see a judge for that. But all charges were dropped. These guys know that a car won't stop instantly so such behavior is just stupid.