Witten played 1 more game than Schoon.So Schoonmaker only scored 60 percent as many touchdowns as Witten
I do wish he wa s younger though.
The different era's don't mean anything. Michigan is a run heavy team that runs a pro attack, not a spread offense everyone is running elsewhere.Receptions Share
Witten: 17.7%
Schoonmaker: 14.7%
YPC
Witten: 12.6
Schoonmaker: 11.9
I couldn't find target share, but Witten was clearly a more integral part of the passing game, and you have to adjust for era. 35 catches meant a heck of a lot more in 2002 than it does now. Schoonmaker's numbers also probably get cut in half, at least, if Erick All didn't get hurt - he had 1 catch in each of the first 3 games.
And not for nothing, but Schoonmaker was pretty invisible against good defenses. He had 2 catches for 47 yards against Penn St., Ohio St. and TCU. Conversely, he had 16 for 129 - nearly half of his production - in two games against Maryland and Indiana.
Schoon will probably be an average TE in the league for a lot of years, but he's not anything special. If not for the weakness of this draft, he's a 5th rounder.
What exactly do you think Tennesee was in 2002? Air raid?The different era's don't mean anything. Michigan is a run heavy team that runs a pro attack, not a spread offense everyone is running elsewhere.
Just goes to show that it's hard to know. One of the reasons so many players fail. Production is an important component of evaluation, but it certainly doesn't mean everything.The other one was Kittle in his senior year at Iowa, 22/314 14.3 average 4 TDs.
The other thing they all have in common is their 40 times which was good for all of them. So maybe we hit on a good one.Just goes to show that it's hard to know. One of the reasons so many players fail. Production is an important component of evaluation, but it certainly doesn't mean everything.
Have no idea how Schoonmaker will turn out (not like some on this board who have it all figured out), but there are plenty of examples of players with so-so production and good athleticism who have turned into top players and players with great production and so-so athleticism who have too. Then, you get the same thing with players who have failed.
Let me preface this by saying it’s based strictly on comparable measurables, but several of Schoonmaker’s measurements and times compare favorably to Travis Kelce, the best in the game. They include height, weight, and 40-time.The other thing they all have in common is their 40 times which was good for all of them. So maybe we hit on a good one.
That would be nice.Let me preface this by saying it’s based strictly on comparable measurables, but several of Schoonmaker’s measurements and times compare favorably to Travis Kelce, the best in the game. They include height, weight, and 40-time.
Anywhere in the same universe would be nice! And maybe help to somehow make up for passing on Kelce in the first place. (I will never forget!)That would be nice.
Any predictions for how quickly Schoonmaker develops? I'm hoping his blocking is up to the task early and with Wells working with him his receive is respectable by the end of the season.Anywhere in the same universe would be nice! And maybe help to somehow make up for passing on Kelce in the first place. (I will never forget!)
Yet here you are.This comes under the heading of the most useless thread of the day
In Lunda I trust. He did an amazing job with Ferguson and Hendershot last year, so I have high hopes again this year.Any predictions for how quickly Schoonmaker develops? I'm hoping his blocking is up to the task early and with Wells working with him his receive is respectable by the end of the season.
It depends on how you look at it. I look at it and see no reason not to be optimistic about Schoon.This comes under the heading of the most useless thread of the day