Good vs. Dysfunctional Franchises

[BringBackThatOleTimeBoys]

I'm trying to make a list of franchises that are dysfunctional vs. the good ones.

Dysfunctional

• Washington
• Oakland
• Dallas
• Miami
• Cleveland
• Jets?

Good

• New England
• Pittsburgh
• Philadelphia
• Denver
• Baltimore
• Green Bay

 

[BoysFan4ever]

Good..Indy.

 

[Future]

Say what you will about Jerruh, but this franchise is not "dysfunctional"...whatever that means.

 

[03EBZ06]

I'm not so sure I would place Eagles organization as being good, they have had their share of controversies.

 

[BoysFan4ever]

I think the Cowboys are seriously dysfunctional. They have been for many years.

New Orleans is run the right way other than that putting bounties on players thing.

 

[HeavyBarrel]

+1 for New Orleans, Peyton and Loomis do good work

 

[muck4doo]

Lions have been dysfunctional for decades.

 

[Stryker44]

With what they've been spending in free agency compared to the product they've been putting on the field for most of the last decade - I'd add Tampa Bay to the dysfunctional list.

 

[Reverend Conehead]

I pretty much agree with your list, though I would put the Jets and Philly as tweeners. I'm not ready to label either as dysfunctional or good. I agree with others that New Orleans belongs on the good list. I would also put Seattle on it. KC is another one I would put as a tweener.