BigDDynasty
New Member
- Messages
- 172
- Reaction score
- 0
Wow! U see the Boys play bad against the saints and now ur scared to see them again. LOL. Trust me Dipchit, that was their super bowl, and Payton won't outsmart Parcells twice.
BigDDynasty;1252163 said:Wow! U see the Boys play bad against the saints and now ur scared to see them again. LOL. Trust me Dipchit, that was their super bowl, and Payton won't outsmart Parcells twice.
jeff;1252115 said:Guess What? We're not the 92 Cowboys.... I'll take an easy team over a tough team anyday...
If we lose the division and get that fifth or sixth spot, would we face someone like Seatle? I'm not sure that wouldn't work out better for us than facing the Giants or the Eagles again, even if it would be at home.
I'm not advocating losing the division, I'm just asking...?
You want the N.Y.Giants to win against New Orleans where we can get the bye.sandtrapp;1251976 said:Gotta tell ya , I think i would rather have the gints lose Sun. Than to have the aint 's lose and possibly give us the division.
Besides hating the gints as much as I do, I do not want to meet them in the playoffs any where or any time.
Now if the aint's win Sun. and then lose their last game ,and we win out ,wouldn't that give us the division?
If so , Thats what I'm asking Santa For.
DragonCowboy;1251990 said:In that case, IF Carolina can beat the Saints (which I highly, highly, highly, highly, highly doubt), then it would be better. I just don't trust the Panthers.
sandtrapp;1251976 said:Gotta tell ya , I think i would rather have the gints lose Sun. Than to have the aint 's lose and possibly give us the division.
Besides hating the gints as much as I do, I do not want to meet them in the playoffs any where or any time.
Now if the aint's win Sun. and then lose their last game ,and we win out ,wouldn't that give us the division?
If so , Thats what I'm asking Santa For.
LD Fan;1252226 said:If anyone doesn't see the match-up problems we have with NO then they're watching some other sport. They are loaded with weapons that attack our 2 most glaring weaknesses.....safety and pass rush. I do think if we play them again it will be a higher scoring game but I would not have as much confidence as I would with ANY other NFC team. Whatever scenario it takes, I want the #2 seed bye and home games throughout until/if we have to play Chicago.
Doomsday101;1252229 said:NO would be a tough match up but I think had Dallas stayed with the running game a weak spot for the saints we would have given ourselves a better chance to win that game. If some where down the line we have to play the saints I do expect a different outcome.
LD Fan;1252231 said:I agree. I also think we'll be better prepared for NO trying to keep Romo from rolling out. We'll definately make adjustments but all their offensive weapons and our defensive weaknesses are a bad combination.
Doomsday101;1252236 said:I agree I think it is a tough matchup but to get to the SB team are going to face good teams and tough matchups. If we have to play the saints then I do expect to see better play from the Cowboys defense and a more consistant running attack. The last time we played them the Saints could do no wrong and Dallas could not do much right. I don't expect that the next time around, I do think we are better than that.
LD Fan;1252245 said:For the record, as much of a Cowboy fan as I am I don't think we're good enough to be a SB team. I can't remember a SB team being as weak as we are in critical areas like pass rush and safety play. Well, maybe I should qualify that a little. This year the NFC is clearly the JV. Maybe we have a chance this year.
my feelings exactly........sandtrapp;1251976 said:Gotta tell ya , I think i would rather have the gints lose Sun. Than to have the aint 's lose and possibly give us the division.
Besides hating the gints as much as I do, I do not want to meet them in the playoffs any where or any time.
Now if the aint's win Sun. and then lose their last game ,and we win out ,wouldn't that give us the division?
If so , Thats what I'm asking Santa For.