Grant pro day

Do you know if he opted out of the 40 or it's to be recorded later on?
 


4.53 pro day 40...would that be a 4.6 at the combine? Not that .07 is going to be the make or break of anything, but sucks that there’s so much speculation to these times this year
 
To me, Grant's an option - but Moehirg is by far the better option.
 


  • 4.53 pro day 40...would that be a 4.6 at the combine? Not that .07 is going to be the make or break of anything, but sucks that there’s so much speculation to these times this year

Nothing really eye catching there, yeah. It's a little slower than I expected though. Especially because one of the selling points was this guy had the athleticism for high safety. That combined with a pretty crummy VJ makes me think he's not this can't miss prospect

Selfishly, I like this because if Holland tests better, he is a better overall prospect IMO. (Holland is a pet cat)
 
Nothing really eye catching there, yeah. It's a little slower than I expected though. Especially because one of the selling points was this guy had the athleticism for high safety. That combined with a pretty crummy VJ makes me think he's not this can't miss prospect

Selfishly, I like this because if Holland tests better, he is a better overall prospect IMO. (Holland is a pet cat)

I think Grant is solid, but not spectacular. If he were to be there at 75 I wouldn’t have a problem, just don’t see him as a top 45 prospect. But I would also put Holland in that same category...I’ll continue to pound the table for my guy Jamar Johnson as the FS we should draft
 


4.53 pro day 40...would that be a 4.6 at the combine? Not that .07 is going to be the make or break of anything, but sucks that there’s so much speculation to these times this year

So that means Moehrig is 4.6 too right?
 
Suddenly I like Divine Deablo alot more after this. Watch his tape too.Kid is a stud and rising.
 
So that means Moehrig is 4.6 too right?

Sure...I have no bias, just trying to be realistic. If everyone looks at the 4.3 times with skeptical eyes you have to do the same with all the times no?

Also not saying that a 4.6 40 time means that a safety can’t succeed. It’s near the borderline, but I’d still say that’s within range of acceptable times.
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
465,968
Messages
13,907,660
Members
23,793
Latest member
Roger33
Back
Top