BrAinPaiNt;4720211 said:Reminds me of the scene in Coming to America.
Oh and don't post the video or audio to that scene unless you find one that is censored.
I am almost positive there is not a PG-rated cut of that scene out there.BrAinPaiNt;4720211 said:Reminds me of the scene in Coming to America.
Oh and don't post the video or audio to that scene unless you find one that is censored.
joseephuss;4720247 said:I would love to see a fight between George Foreman in his prime(before Ali changed his career) and Tyson in his prime. That would be a brutal slugfest.
I do like Tyson, but I don't consider him the greatest. He didn't face a lot of top quality opponents, which isn't his fault. There weren't a lot of great heavyweights in the late 1980s early 1990s.
jobberone;4716579 said:My Grandmother said it was Joe Louis. He was too old when I saw him to know. Ali is the best boxer I've ever seen no matter the division. I do admit I haven't seen the last few champions. Who's your choice?
dexternjack;4720259 said:Sonny Liston was a good one too.
BrAinPaiNt;4720211 said:Reminds me of the scene in Coming to America.
Oh and don't post the video or audio to that scene unless you find one that is censored.
Your talking pound-for-pound fighters though. Everyone of those guys don't last a round fighting heavyweights.JonJon;4720459 said:The default is Ali, and Sugar Ray Robinson deserves mention, but I'm going to give a name that will raise some eyebrows.
Floyd Mayweather.
In my mind, he is the best pure boxer in terms of skill. He has the speed to land at will and has knockout power. Plus he has one of the best defensive styles I have ever seen, and I watch a LOT of boxing, old and new. He gets a bad rep because people don't like him as a person, but in the ring, few would beat him.
Honorable mention is Roy Jones in his prime. He was simply unbeatable, often untouchable, and possessed the fastest hands I've ever seen. The knocks against him are his lack of big name opponents and then his propensity late in his career to get knocked out by no-name bums.
dreghorn2;4720383 said:From a pure, who would beat who in their prime, this discussion would really see a lot of different opinions.
I would place Ali, Holmes, and Lewis (Lennox) as perhaps the three winners of a round robin 'in their primes ' tournament.
Ali was insanely good, great speed, good size, but lacked power.
For the majority of his career Ali fought handpicked opponents in very favorable circumstances, with a few exceptions. Even his Liston win had an air of 'mystery' to it.
Holmes was a tremendous boxer who fought in a down period for heavyweights. Completely dominate for a great many years Holmes had skills few heavyweights have ever had. Brilliant fighter.
Lennox Lewis had it all, size, power, reach, chin, and a simply punishing hammer jab that would deny his opponents entry into the 'danger' zones of pro boxing.
Discounting eras and simply going on size, training, skills, etc.. i think a case can be made that these three would be the ones standing after an all-time heavyweights competition.
jobberone;4720533 said:I thought about Holmes and Lewis. I don't know about them because boxing was on the downswing then. I don't agree with you about Ali. He had power but it wasn't in the same class as Johnson, Dempsey, Lewis, Marciano, Liston, Foreman, or Tyson.
Ali fought during perhaps the greatest time in heavyweight boxing history. That's certainly arguable but the competition was pretty good. Some of his competition would have made great champions. Ken Norton comes to mind. Add in Frazier, Foreman, and Holmes and you have some great fighters.