Guidelines for the final 53 man roster

xwalker

Well-Known Member
Messages
57,202
Reaction score
64,709
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
There are some general tendencies every year in regards to players making the active roster and practice squad.

When I look at fringe players, I like to consider where each player fits within the following guidelines.

1st year players:

1. Draft picks are harder to slide to the practice squad than UDFAs.

2. If a UDFA was given above average guaranteed money, then other teams wanted that player and those teams are a threat to sign that player from the Practice Squad.
Example: Magee

3. If a UDFA was not given above average guaranteed money, then that player is likely to make it to the PS, at least for awhile.
Example: Kendial Lawrence, Hamilton, Reed

p.s. People will "feel" that Hamilton is not in this category; however, just keep in mind that other teams could have offered him more money to sign as a UDFA if they really wanted him. It might not matter because he only has to beat out now-overpaid Danny McCray for the 5th safety spot.

2nd year and later players:

4. If a guy was on the practice squad last year without being signed by another team, then it is doubtful that another team would sign him this year either.
Example: Danny Coale was on the PS before being injured.

5. If a player was moved from the PS to the active roster late in the previous season, then there was probably interest in that player from another team.
Example: Weems, Leary

6. If a veteran was signed this offseaon to a veteran’s minimum contract, then other teams didn’t have a great interest in that player when the roster limit was 90. It’s doubtful that there will be significant interest in that player when the roster limit is 53. A roster spot often opens up after the 1st or 2nd game due to injury or other reasons which allows players in this category to be re-signed at some point.
Example: Hayden, Hargrove, Sims, Rosario

7. If a player has not been available as a Free Agent since being on the active roster, then there is a good chance that some team will sign that player if cut. The other team might try to slide that player to their own PS later.
Example: Tanner

8. Great performances in the pre-season can make a players value to other teams higher.

9. Special Teams can be the deciding factor for non-starters.
Example: Beasley must be significantly better than the bigger WRs because he does not appear to be a special teams contributor.

10. Don’t forget player's secondary skills. RBs must be able to block and catches passes. Pass-rushers must be able to play the run.
Example: Kendial Lawrence will have to be able to block to have any chance of making the 53 man roster.

11. Injury history could be the deciding factor.
Example: Ernie Sims has had multiple concussions.

12. Don't forget restructured contracts. If a players contract was restructured this off-season, then most of his original base salary was guaranteed.
Example: If Livings contract was restructured, then there is a minimal chance that he gets cut. I'm not certain that it did or didn't get restructured. Someone posted that Cook's contract was restructured; however, that does not appear to be correct.
 

Eskimo

Well-Known Member
Messages
12,821
Reaction score
496
Good principles to go by.

Another one is where there isn't much cost to release a veteran, if a younger player is playing at a level close to the vet, the vet will be released and the younger player will probably be kept. It is not necessarily about getting the 53 best for the start of the season. It is often more about getting the guys who will be the 53 best players at the end of the season and the next season.
 

Wulfman

Unofficial GM
Messages
1,300
Reaction score
19
xwalker;5100686 said:
12. Don't forget restructured contracts. If a players contract was restructured this off-season, then most of his original base salary was guaranteed.
Example: If Livings contract was restructured, then there is a minimal chance that he gets cut. I'm not certain that it did or didn't get restructured. Someone posted that Cook's contract was restructured; however, that does not appear to be correct.

It's been reported that Livings and the Cowboys worked out a restructure, but that it was put in place in case they needed it, and was never turned in to the league office. Ironically, spotrac has the restructure listed as if it was, indeed, turned.

The opposite is true for Cook. The article linked, here, is one among many that listed Cook as having been restructured in the first wave of players to get under the cap. According to spotrac, however, no restructure was turned in, and Cook is still under the same contract he agreed to last year.

I'm beginning to wonder if the details of the two players were mixed up. If that's the case, it could shift a couple of players on the 53-man roster.
 

big dog cowboy

THE BIG DOG
Staff member
Messages
101,904
Reaction score
112,901
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
Eskimo;5100743 said:
It is not necessarily about getting the 53 best for the start of the season. It is often more about getting the guys who will be the 53 best players at the end of the season and the next season.

Absolutely on the money. Something that is always overlooked.
 
Top