- Messages
- 47,997
- Reaction score
- 27,917
theogt;1768385 said:I'm not sure I ever said they wouldn't. I still don't think they should.
Giant lover!
theogt;1768385 said:I'm not sure I ever said they wouldn't. I still don't think they should.
5Stars;1768379 said:Explain to me...what's the big deal about removing a sack?
I don't get it...does the player get more money for the one sack?
Can the Giants reverse the win for that one sack?
I just don't get it...
Cowboys22;1768388 said:Because he has been talking crap all year so its funny to see him lose the sack. Thats one less sack our oline has given up. Incentives and future contracts are all based on stats so yes it can be a very big deal.
:laugh2:MichaelWinicki;1768387 said:Giant lover!
Well, that may be true on certain levels.MichaelWinicki;1768387 said:Giant lover!
theogt;1768394 said:Well, that may be true on certain levels.
5Stars;1768391 said:Over getting one more sack? Or not allowing one more sack?
:laugh2:
It's just sound like sour grapes to me, that's all....
5Stars;1768409 said:So what certain levels are we talking about?
superpunk;1767692 said:I noticed that this morning, on my fantasy team, lol.
theogt;1768385 said:I'm not sure I ever said they wouldn't. I still don't think they should.
AdamJT13;1768456 said:Why not?
I just think it gets into a pretty gray area judging whether something is an intended pass or not.AdamJT13;1768456 said:Why not?