has he spoke yet?

CanadianCowboysFan;1259561 said:
If you want Parcells gone, you better have a replacement who is at least equal or better than him, unless of course you prefer to have Gailey or Campo return.

Yes, Parcells is better than Campo.

So is my paper boy.
 
Juke99;1259573 said:
Yes, Parcells is better than Campo.

So is my paper boy.

Really, Parcells is better than Campo argument is getting real old. Sure he is better, heck you can find a better coach than Campo without trying too much.

I think I am starting to understand why BP is different now than he was with even Jets. He is not the BP I really thought was the best Coach ever, when he was with NE and Jets, especially the masterful job he did with Jets.

He doesn't have the fire anymore seems like. It seems like he doesn't enjoy wins as much either. And the team shows it. Especially whenever there is supposedly big game, and team is favored to win.

I do worry, who the heck would be coach to replace him though? It has to be some young coach, but who?
 
bbgun;1258720 said:
I love how the bully stares down a kid like Miles Austin while his world collapses all around him. Any mean stares directed towards the D, Bill?

Maybe you should send a pleasant letter to all the media outlets covering the Cowboys games and ask them if they could have a "Bill Cam" in the upper right corner of the screen during the whole game.

That way, for every second of every game, you could monitor his facial expressions and write up the stats on dirty looks, motivational glances, eye rolls, disgusted sighs and whatever else you think makes a coach great.

Everyone wants him to be fired up and yell at the players, but now you worry that he's too hard on poor Miles and he's gonna be butt hurt about it for the rest of the season.

Puhleeeeeeeeeeeze!

:rolleyes:
 
RCowboyFan;1259677 said:
I do worry, who the heck would be coach to replace him though? It has to be some young coach, but who?

That's the big question though. It is clear we are far better now than when Parcells took over so his tenure has to be considered a success in that regard. If we are to replace him, then it has to be for someone who will improve us. Who out there and who is available fits that bill so to speak.
 
CanadianCowboysFan;1259689 said:
That's the big question though. It is clear we are far better now than when Parcells took over so his tenure has to be considered a success in that regard. If we are to replace him, then it has to be for someone who will improve us. Who out there and who is available fits that bill so to speak.

Charlie Weis
Jeff Fisher
Tom Coughlin

a few assistants
 
Right now, the names of quality replacements are limited. That doesn't mean they don't exist or aren't available come February. I have my problems with Bill, but I'm not necessarily onboard with him leaving. Just knowing how the landscape changes once coaches start moving around, thought I'd chime in.
 
mickgreen58;1258783 said:
I am sure the "STAT" guys are going to come in here and argue until they are blue in the face about how we have a dominating defense, cause turnovers and have a great pass rush.

From day, the Pass Rush is going to be our complete undoing.

Garcia had all day to throw.

I have been saying that all year and all the sunshiners keep preaching the same old line.
 
scottsp;1259716 said:
Right now, the names of quality replacements are limited. That doesn't mean they don't exist or aren't available come February. I have my problems with Bill, but I'm not necessarily onboard with him leaving. Just knowing how the landscape changes once coaches start moving around, thought I'd chime in.

:laugh2: Is that what I think it is wearing the 81 in your avatar?
 
mickgreen58;1258783 said:
I am sure the "STAT" guys are going to come in here and argue until they are blue in the face about how we have a dominating defense, cause turnovers and have a great pass rush.

From day, the Pass Rush is going to be our complete undoing.

Garcia had all day to throw.

Amen. Like you said, you don't need a calculator to tell you what you saw.
 
gbrittain;1259723 said:
I have been saying that all year and all the sunshiners keep preaching the same old line.

Would you prefer we all be doom and gloomers? In my view, if it is all doom and gloom, why bother watching games. Even when we were down and deep down I knew we wouldn't come back, I still said to myself, don't worry it's only nine etc.

Watching a team and thinking it will fail is no fun.
 
dbair1967;1258738 said:
I just want to hear him say he is retiring

David

omg... I just noticed your sig... freaking hilarious man. Zimmer needs to just go away.
 
CanadianCowboysFan;1259735 said:
Would you prefer we all be doom and gloomers? In my view, if it is all doom and gloom, why bother watching games. Even when we were down and deep down I knew we wouldn't come back, I still said to myself, don't worry it's only nine etc.

Watching a team and thinking it will fail is no fun.


No, there is this thing called reality. Heck, if someone comes out here and says Any Given Sunday then great.

Do not however show me a team that is poorly coached and can not play defense and try to convince me otherwise.

Calling Troy Hambrick a good RB is not thinking positive it is being delusional.
 
gbrittain;1259754 said:
No, there is this thing called reality. Heck, if someone comes out here and says Any Given Sunday then great.

Do not however show me a team that is poorly coached and can not play defense and try to convince me otherwise.

Calling Troy Hambrick a good RB is not thinking positive it is being delusional.

What does Hambrick have to do with anything? That is really pulling an argument out of your well you know...
 
Its clear the team does not respond well to Parcells in big games. Dallas lost to NO and Philly AT HOME without competing.
 
Wood;1259793 said:
Its clear the team does not respond well to Parcells in big games. Dallas lost to NO and Philly AT HOME without competing.

The Giants too.

- Mike G.
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
464,576
Messages
13,819,705
Members
23,780
Latest member
HoppleSopple
Back
Top