Has Wade ever had a dominating defense?

juck

Well-Known Member
Messages
9,246
Reaction score
244
Seriously has he?San Diego was good but they also had a wicked offense like we did last season.I think he is hyped cause of his daddy.Some may say well its the players as well,then its still Wade cause he evaluates the talent and puts them on the field.If its the players its his job to get others that can play better.
 

AdamJT13

Salary Cap Analyst
Messages
16,583
Reaction score
4,529
Some people thought he did in San Diego because the Chargers got lots of sacks, and our fans wanted more sacks, because a defense that doesn't allow many yards or points but doesn't get sacks isn't any good because it's all about getting sacks and sacks and more sacks.

Now they understand that it's not about sacks, it's about stopping the opponent.
 

Rack

Federal Agent
Messages
23,906
Reaction score
3,106
AdamJT13;2360035 said:
Some people thought he did in San Diego because the Chargers got lots of sacks, and our fans wanted more sacks, because a defense that doesn't allow many yards or points but doesn't get sacks isn't any good because it's all about getting sacks and sacks and more sacks.

Now they understand that it's not about sacks, it's about stopping the opponent.

Sorry Adam, but that's just not true.

Or you're just referring to the ignorant ones and if that's the case, why bother addressing anything they wanted?


Our defense needed to get more pressure, but not get weaker in other areas on the process.
 

JohnnyHopkins

This is a house of learned doctors
Messages
11,302
Reaction score
3,610
Only if you count his defending his team and coaches on a weekly basis.
 

Boysboy

New Member
Messages
4,852
Reaction score
0
juckie;2360020 said:
Seriously has he?San Diego was good but they also had a wicked offense like we did last season.I think he is hyped cause of his daddy.Some may say well its the players as well,then its still Wade cause he evaluates the talent and puts them on the field.If its the players its his job to get others that can play better.

Yes-the Chargers D was THAT good. It wasn't just about the sacks, but they had alot of playmakers on D. They had 5-6 true pass rushers, plus a secondary that was physical and played press coverage really well. They also played the run really well too.

BTW-less not forget they played alot of "Marty Ball" on offense...so it wasn't like their offensive philosophy was exactly "wicked".
 

khiladi

Well-Known Member
Messages
36,965
Reaction score
37,488
AdamJT13;2360035 said:
Some people thought he did in San Diego because the Chargers got lots of sacks, and our fans wanted more sacks, because a defense that doesn't allow many yards or points but doesn't get sacks isn't any good because it's all about getting sacks and sacks and more sacks.

Now they understand that it's not about sacks, it's about stopping the opponent.

But they also created turnovers with their pressure, meaning they were creating legitimate pressure with their sacks, unlike our garbage time sacks. They generated at least one turnover every game. They were 7th in points allowed and they were first in scoring. Even when building huge leads, they didn't let-up as much as our team does. When we score a lot, our defense sucks and doesn't contain the opposing offense.

And look how awful the San Diego defense has deteriorated since Wade left.

The difference is that Wade was actually the defensive coordinator. The guy forced 4 turnovers against the Patriots in the play-offs, and Brady was the one committing them.
 

AdamJT13

Salary Cap Analyst
Messages
16,583
Reaction score
4,529
khiladi;2360075 said:
But they also created turnovers with their pressure, meaning they were creating legitimate pressure with their sacks, unlike our garbage time sacks.

They were 15th in total turnovers forced and 17th in interceptions that season. We forced more turnovers that season -- and scored more defensive touchdowns -- with barely half as many sacks.
 
Top