Have anyone here seen this?

[BHendri5]

if this is a repost remove this thread.

Cowboys | Team reviewing R. Williams' future with team
Wed, 2 Apr 2008 17:21:38 -0700

John Murphy, of Yahoo Sports, reports the Dallas Cowboys are continuing to review possible ways to include SS Roy Williams in their future plans or possibly make one of several moves with him. If the Cowboys were to trade for Tennessee Titans CB Pacman Jones or draft a cornerback in the first round, they could shift CB Anthony Henry to safety. The Cowboys could then ask Williams to transition up to linebacker, take a pay cut to remain with the team or possibly be released on or before June 1.

 

[dmq]

Nice find, but this has no more truth then us speculating on his future. We gave him too big a bonus to get rid of him.

 

[Little Jr]

http://cowboyszone.com/forums/showthread.php?t=115833

Yeah about 3 days ago.

 

[zrinkill]

John Murphy, of Yahoo Sports

 

[Big Dakota]

Repost of garbage is a bannable offense:

 

[zrinkill]

Here is a link to the guys Bio and the stories he has written ..... that one is not there.

http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/expertsarchive?author=John+Murphy

Personally I think this is bullcrap since neither time it was posted has had a link to the article.

 

[Bleu Star]

Repost of garbage is a bannable offense:

You guys are harsh.

 

[Little Jr]

Here is a link to the guys Bio and the stories he has written ..... that one is not there.

http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/expertsarchive?author=John+Murphy

Personally I think this is bullcrap since neither time it was posted has had a link to the article.

There was a link last time. It was KFFL link.

 

[zrinkill]

There was a link last time. It was KFFL link.

There was no link to the article ...... just a link to a blog talking about the article (and it did not have a link either)

 

[BHendri5]

That was my first time seeing that article, and I posted it, and if you had read, if you know how to read and comprehend, all you fellows that that want to talk @#$%, I asked if anyone had seen this.

The proper response should have been yes someone posted this a few days ago, etc etc.

One person was mature enough to say yes it was posted.
That's cool, I understand some of you feel tough on the internet.

 

[zrinkill]

That was my first time seeing that article, and I posted it, and if you had read, if you know how to read and comprehend, all you fellows that that want to talk @#$%, I asked if anyone had seen this.

The proper response should have been yes someone posted this a few days ago, etc etc.

One person was mature enough to say yes it was posted.
That's cool, I understand some of you feel tough on the internet.

No one was attacking you man ..... just the article

 

[Little Jr]

There was no link to the article ...... just a link to a blog talking about the article (and it did not have a link either)

I know. It was KFFL. I havent been on KFFL in about 4 years so I dont know how realiable they are now.

 

[BHendri5]

No one was attacking you man ..... just the article

Ok, I thought they were attacking me.

 

[WoodysGirl]

I know. It was KFFL. I havent been on KFFL in about 4 years so I dont know how realiable they are now.

Ordinarily KFFL is reliable, it's just that this particular blurb cannot be validated on Yahoo anywhere.

It's not unrealistic to think that Roy Williams future with the team is under scrutiny, but there's no orginating source for it on Yahoo, which is why the other thread was locked.

 

[zrinkill]

Ok, I thought they were attacking me.

I think some of them were teasing you ..... I was just making sure everyone knew the story on that article.

Thanks for posting it though man ..... It could have been legit and we always welcome news.

 

[Boysboy]

Well-the Skins were in the same situation with Brandon Lloyd, but were somehow able to escape(by taking a cap hit NEXT year, only, by taking the June 1st one). So yeah, they managed to come out OK by cutting him.

Why can't we do something similar with Roy?

 

[Aven8]

U still have to be able to tackle as a LB correct? Yeah, even it were true it wouldn't work. LB's are required to tackle the guy with the ball!! Not whiff on them!

 

[5mics]

U still have to be able to tackle as a LB correct? Yeah, even it were true it wouldn't work. LB's are required to tackle the guy with the ball!! Not whiff on them!

LBs should also be able to cover TEs and RBs coming out of the backfield, right?

 

[kristie]

LBs should also be able to cover TEs and RBs coming out of the backfield, right?

i think so.

 

[5mics]

i think so.

I guess our RW is out of luck then.....