Yeah, I thought the whole point of arguing was to try to get the other person to agree with you. Once they start to, you don't want them to? (Directed at those people, not you, KFS5)
You assume he failed but that's not the facts. He missed a test but came the very next test and passed it
For normies it is. But for people like this, if you ever make a mistake, you are married to it forever. Sad but many people won't allow others to grow. Heck I was wrong about Dak and I converted. Dak has proven he is good. It would be ignorant to keep thinking he wasn't. So for all that is good, allow people to come around in their time. When they do, give them a attaboy.
are you kidding us? the new threads like yours here where you are attacking people who have said anything you deem negative about Dak outnumber the actual threads putting him down about 10 to 1
Way to completely miss the point of the post, by taking a portion of it out of context and in so doing prove my point.
So what? If they have that view point so be it. Who are you to force them to accept your viewpoint?
No that is not the point of discussion imo. Discussion is meant to move a conversation forward by becoming more and more informed. Less and less ignorant. And the reason for this post is obvious. People are continuing to be negative about Dak. Meaning they said their critiques were not about hate, but honest. And now with things on the field very different over the last 16 games. Those same people are continuing to make the same critiques. Proving it was never anything but hate in the first place. And when you do this you kind of prove you are not really a fan. Hence the point of the post.
What? This a forum. We discuss things here.
Discussion, yes...but there's very little discussion, when compared to arguments. You said, "You don't get to nonsensically attack someone, then start liking them." That doesn't sound like someone continuing to make the same critiques. Maybe you're thinking I was talking about a different post?
Unless something is "discussed" that you do not agree with?
I explained my point. To have reason to dislike something is one thing. But when the thing you dislike changes. And you continue to have the exact same dislikes. That is nonsensical. When the thing changes and your attacking stays the same, then that invalidates your argument that your dislike was reasonable. It proves you are disliking for other reasons than what is happening on the field. I stated a specific example of someone saying they will "never like Dak no matter what". To me that invalidates everything they have said, and will say going forward. It is patently dishonest. I was speaking to those people. And there are quite a few of them here. And also to the people here, who like me, are driven crazy by that kind of dishonesty.
You completely missed the point of my post. I have explained further and you still miss it. So be it.
Oh, I think I see now. When you made the post I quoted, you were saying they're just pretending to like him now?
I believe Dak was one tipped interception away from a second perfect game in a row.
