Kaika
Have a Good Day Pilgrims
- Messages
- 2,697
- Reaction score
- 0
sandtrapp;1310600 said:Wasn't he someone The Boys were interested in??
Actually there's blurb in an article somewhere stating that Jerry spoke to Capers but was rebuffed. So it's not so much about hesitating or being wrong, Capers wasn't interested in signing on for what amounts to a 1-yr deal.BigDFan5;1310605 said:People on this board were interested, I never saw anything linking the Cowboys to him. Even if they were interested he was under contract and not allowed to tlk to us, therefore the "He who hesitates" line is wrong
WoodysGirl;1310614 said:Actually there's blurb in an article somewhere stating that Jerry spoke to Capers but was rebuffed. So it's not so much about hesitating or being wrong, Capers wasn't interested in signing on for what amounts to a 1-yr deal.
sandtrapp;1310610 said:Thanx for the correction.
If I could I would delete the thread.
Not Jerry, Parcells...BigDFan5;1310622 said:hmmm maybe I missed it? If we did talk to him about a job, then Jerry was tampering since he is under contract still
Yeagermeister;1310603 said:Until Parcells is gone it doesn't matter who is available.
WoodysGirl;1310630 said:Not Jerry, Parcells...Parcells recently spoke to Dom Capers to gauge his interest in running the defense, but was rebuffed. Still, it's an indication Parcells wants an established coordinator. But as hard as it might be to fathom, not every coach yearns to work for Parcells. http://cowboyszone.com/forums/showthread.php?t=78029&highlight=capers
BigDFan5;1310648 said:wouldnt that still be tampering?
WoodysGirl;1310652 said:per the article posted in this thread...Capers' current deal was set to expire on Sunday; he would have been able to talk with other teams, but he would not have been able to sign with another team until Feb. 1.JMO, I imagine Parcells was given permission, along with whoever else inquired about his services seeing as they had no head coach and the assistants are all in limbo.
It's not tampering if he was given permission...BigDFan5;1310659 said:Yeah Thats what I meant he wasnt avaliale to teams until Sunday, so is it tampering?
Who do the tampering rules apply to? Cause I know players talk to other players about signing with their team during the pro bowl, but nothing is ever done
WoodysGirl;1310667 said:It's not tampering if he was given permission...
And then depending on how it was presented to Capers, could it technically be called tampering? It could've been presented to him as a hypothetical.
While I don't think Parcells went thru a bunch of subterfuge to talk to Capers, I don't think he would do anything to jeapardize the organization.