Hello media and fans: Favre's injury was not why the Pack lost the game

[jesusphreak]

Numerous times already last night and this morning I've seen fans, analysts, and articles mention Favre's injury as one of the reasons the Cowboys won.

I'm sure this has been repeated several times here already, but the Packers were better off with Rodgers than they were with Favre. The Cowboys defense was absolutely dominating Favre. He was getting hit every play. Hell, the reason he got injured was because of defensive pressure!

I'm just getting annoyed by people who don't seem to be paying attention to the game.

 

[UDcowboysfan]

I think they would have done worse with favre in the game. We DID NOT game plan for rogers.

 

[kmp77]

They moved it better with Rogers in. We were killing Favre.

 

[Hoofbite]

I agree, if Favre stays in the game, it would have been an absolute domination.

 

[Kaika]

I've been listening to this BS all day and I'm getting kinda fed up, until I remember.
"EMBRACE THE HATRED"

People can complain all they want and make all the excuses they want about The Boys wins , bottom line is we're 11-1 and going to the playoffs and they can all kiss my _ _ _, well, you know.:starspin

 

[Future]

He's lucky he got hurt otherwise it would have been one of those 4/5 pick games.

 

[percyhoward]

Personally, I'm hoping he gets better soon and Rogers doesn't see any more playing time.

 

[ZeroClub]

Favre's injury was not why the Pack lost the game

The worst thing about the Favre injury (for the Packers) was that the injury didn't happen earlier in the game.

 

[Sarge]

Favrerer under pressure is a dream come true for us. He is an INT machine under pressure.

 

[bbgun]

http://img412.*************/img412/7575/9015000packersvcowboyssm4.jpg

Tony: "No, really! Your *** is going down tonight."

 

[lurkercowboy]

We didn't have enough film on Rodgers. (joke)