Henry Ruggs film

[darthseinfeld]

 

[xwalker]

Legit big time on-field speed.
Good hands when open.

Questions about his deep ball tracking/skills.
Decent contested ball WR in college but that's a question mark against NFL CBs.

Riggs has the "at speed" agility but his short area quickness is limited (see explanation below).

Agility can be divided into 2 categories.
Short Area agility quickness.
Open Field "at speed" agility.

Beasley had great short area agility but limited top speed.

Darren McFadden when running at full speed in the open field had "at speed" agility but his short area quickness was terrible relative to other top athletes.

 

[darthseinfeld]

Legit big time on-field speed.
Good hands when open.

Questions about his deep ball tracking/skills.
Decent contested ball WR in college but that's a question mark against NFL CBs.

Riggs has the "at speed" agility but his short area quickness is limited (see explanation below).

Agility can be divided into 2 categories.
Short Area agility quickness.
Open Field "at speed" agility.

Beasley had great short area agility but limited top speed.

Darren McFadden when running at full speed in the open field had "at speed" agility but his short area quickness was terrible relative to other top athletes.

There is a misconception based on his speed that he is just a deep threat. Ruggs is going to be a WR that will threaten every level of the field and be a threat to score

 

[JBS]

I personally don't see 3 WRs being drafted in the first 16 picks. The bigger question to me is, which WR is going to be the one that is available at 17. I think the least likely to be available is Jeudy. I don't think he's the best, but I do think he's the least likely to fall. I think Ruggs is the most likely to be there and Lamb has a chance to fall.

Depending on who is available along with Ruggs and or Lamb will determine a lot. I'm not passing over Lamb for many players. As a matter of fact, he's at the top of my mini board. Ruggs on the other hand, is closer to the bottom. But there is a very good chance ruggs would be the best available player at 17 and I wouldn't hesitate taking him

 

[McKDaddy]

Legit big time on-field speed.
Good hands when open.

Questions about his deep ball tracking/skills.
Decent contested ball WR in college but that's a question mark against NFL CBs.

Riggs has the "at speed" agility but his short area quickness is limited (see explanation below).

Agility can be divided into 2 categories.
Short Area agility quickness.
Open Field "at speed" agility.

Beasley had great short area agility but limited top speed.

Darren McFadden when running at full speed in the open field had "at speed" agility but his short area quickness was terrible relative to other top athletes.

would you agree that he has a good catch radius? from tape i have watched, looked like he had nice adjustments on balls which is a nice trait to have.

 

[xwalker]

would you agree that he has a good catch radius? from tape i have watched, looked like he had nice adjustments on balls which is a nice trait to have.

Agree.

 

[xwalker]

There is a misconception based on his speed that he is just a deep threat. Ruggs is going to be a WR that will threaten every level of the field and be a threat to score

He was more than a deep threat in college but it"s a fairly significant risk that he'll be limited in the NFL.

I like the player and his upside is high but there have been many similar players that were just average or worse.

His feet remind me of Cordarrell Patterson.