cowboyjoe;2678167 said:per nfl network t o receives one year contract
Avaj;2678483 said:He will help Bills win a few more games, but that is about it
I wonder what he is going to do after the 1 year deal expires.....
Duane;2678187 said:Get your igloo and hot chocolate ready. Think his new shirt will say "icold".
catch17 said:I wish TO nothing but the best.
He loved being a Cowboy and he fought his tail off for this franchise.
Im sure typical bonehead Cowboy fan wants to kick the guy when he is out the door but on Sundays everyone knew TO was going to fight his tail off for the Cowboys to win.
I'll miss TO and wish he could've been a Cowboy his entire career.
BHendri5;2678479 said:I'm with you brother
khiladi;2678468 said:Isn't that what it ultimately boils down to. When you add good players, it raises the chances that you start winning and become relevant, thus putting fans in the seats and raising the value of your team. Your not going to sign crappy players that don't help you win to put fans in the stadium... Further, the Bills fans are and have always been loyal...
5Stars;2678476 said:Yeah, just like he's done for the past team he' played on.
Bills just became the farorite to win the SB this coming season...that makes me sad!
Bleu Star;2678491 said:Go to another team.
Bleu Star;2678491 said:Go to another team.
HomeOfLegends;2678454 said:Why do I get the feeling you would be secretly rooting for the Bills?
With that...........I'm doing what Dallas should of done a month ago and finally did now and that's moving on. All TO related posts are now on mental ignore. Looking forward to the Cowboys of 09' and the players that make up that team.
Bleu Star;2678496 said:I bet you're the type of person that sees a dead carcass in the middle of the road while on the highway and, instead of swerving to avoid it, and going about your business you stop, get out, and kick it to make sure it's dead.
Oh, so TDs have no bearing on the usefulness of a QB to a WR. Just turnovers.CrazyMonster;2678332 said:Ok smarty pants...why not try & accurately present the case.
First off no one said anything about TDs.
Not according to the stats. Romo fumbled 5 times and lost 3.INTS: Romo 14 Edwards 10
Fumbles Lost: Romo 7
Edwards 3 and lost 1.[/quote]Edwards 5
Totals Turnovers: Romo 21 Edwards 15
Almost 30% LESS TURNOVERSYet when you add the TDs the disparity is 26 to 14. Almost 47% more and a far more important stat.
47% less productivity with an extra game played.Edwards additionally played an extra game.
Yeah, wonderful for Owens.
Aw but you didn't Silly Pants. I have accurate facts too. You just choose to ignore them because it blows your silly little claim all to hell.**Those are accurate facts, not some skewed BS you are trying to post to make your case, but lumping in team fumbles/Losman's #'s etc.**
Sorry to burst your little bubble.
Yeah, Owens sheep.dgr81;2678344 said:there are way too many sheep on this site.
TO will have a better season next year with buffalo than any of the receivers in Dallas, including Jason Witten.
Avaj;2678497 said:Oh okay, they don't want him now but they will in a year....
Bleu Star;2678467 said:How does that change the fact that he just signed for 6.5 mil?
5Stars;2678506 said:As opposed to you who would get down on your knees and try to give mouth to mouth?
Hostile;2678507 said:
Totals Turnovers: Romo 21 Edwards 15
Almost 30% LESS TURNOVERSYet when you add the TDs the disparity is 26 to 14. Almost 47% more and a far more important stat.
47% less productivity with an extra game played.
Yeah, wonderful for Owens.
Aw but you didn't Silly Pants. I have accurate facts too. You just choose to ignore them because it blows your silly little claim all to hell.
Have you ever lost an argument? I'd hate to debate something with you.