How far back could they go and still land a WR target?

Cowboyny

Well-Known Member
Messages
18,857
Reaction score
21,918
After 12, which teams maybe looking to draft a receiver?

18-Seahwaks
20-Broncos
22-Chargers
23-Packers-although they never draft 1st rd receivers
25-Texans
30-Bills

say T-Mac is off the board at 12, which is 50/50. How far could we trade back and still land a Golden or an Egbuka? Probably around pick 20. That is the borderline range of obtaining a 2nd rd pick.
 
say T-Mac is off the board at 12, which is 50/50. How far could we trade back and still land a Golden or an Egbuka? Probably around pick 20. That is the borderline range of obtaining a 2nd rd pick.
Pick 20 is Denver. That gets pick 51 and we would have to give up our 5th pick 149 also.

That mean no pick between 76 and 174!
 
Broaddus and company seem to think they are all in on Tet. If he’s picked before us they want to trade back if they can.
 
After 12, which teams maybe looking to draft a receiver?

18-Seahwaks
20-Broncos
22-Chargers
23-Packers-although they never draft 1st rd receivers
25-Texans
30-Bills

say T-Mac is off the board at 12, which is 50/50. How far could we trade back and still land a Golden or an Egbuka? Probably around pick 20. That is the borderline range of obtaining a 2nd rd pick.
25
 
At this point I don’t think you do without getting really lucky.

After the top 4 guys I think we’re talking about a bunch of dudes that would compete with Tolbert or be a quality 3.

Outside or Burden and maybe Kyle Williams I think upgrading WR ship has sailed.

An option I LOVE is pivoting to targeting an electric slot type. The kid from ASU or VT would be awesome and could probably be had in the 3rd/4th.
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
465,102
Messages
13,850,682
Members
23,786
Latest member
waycooljr
Back
Top