How Many Sacks Will Micah Have on Brady?

panchucko

It's Back
Messages
4,367
Reaction score
2,831
I'm thinking 4. What? Don't act like Micah ain't different!

Micah Co-Signing like.....
im-different-2chainz.gif
I'm thinking more sacks than completions just a dream but hey 4 is a lot
 

Ring6

StarSchema
Messages
1,958
Reaction score
1,658
I think if the team sacks him just once, it'll exceed last year's game's production. So, like a couple others have intimated, Micah will force a sack, but who actually gets the sack will probably not be him.

1 sack by the team, zero for Micah, but more than a handful of hurries.
 

TheMightyVanHalen

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,975
Reaction score
3,168
I'm going to say 1 but will have over a dozen hurries. With their O-line not being full strength, Brady will be getting the ball out in under 3 seconds. I sure hope Quinn gameplans for this. I think he will so it's going to be a long night for that old buzzard. 30 - 13 Cowboys
 

gimmesix

Fat, drunk and stupid is no way to go through life
Messages
40,850
Reaction score
38,154
Brady has a crazy fast release. I have to say 0.

Agreed. He's tough to sack. It's Micah's speed to the QB vs. Brady's speedy release. I think he'll get there at least once before Brady's able to get the ball out.
 

tyke1doe

Well-Known Member
Messages
54,418
Reaction score
32,808
Why zero with this defense? I know Brady is awesome at getting the ball out, but he's without Goodwin and Gronk.

Why zero with this defense if Brady had a healthy offensive line?
1. Because Brady has gone against some of the best defenders in his 20 plus years in the league. He knows how to get rid of the ball quickly, even if he has to dump it off.
2. Because the Bucs know to game plan against Parson. Maybe Tank or Williams will get a sack. But they would scheme against Parsons.
3. Because Brady has made no-name receivers great. We could get nothing out of Amendola. Brady made him a household name in New England. Brady requires his receivers to be in the right spot. If not, they're not playing. That's really all you need to beat a pass rush. Get the ball out quickly to the receiver who needs to be in his spot at the time the ball arrives.

Dak could equal Brady, no doubt. I've said this before though, Philbin has shown to do more with less, and inexplicably less with more. Sunday he will be working with less, so maybe its not the nightmare we dread (I know its nonsensical). Additionally, Dak will use his legs more this year, as MM has said, and I believe we will attempt to run the ball. That should limit his pass attempts, if we can find some success doing it.

Consequently +2 sacks for Brady.

We'll see. :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: CWR

Ranched

"We Are Penn State"
Messages
34,885
Reaction score
84,325
Parsons needs to shut it. One good rookie season doesn't mean squat. Elliott is the perfect example!
 

kskboys

Well-Known Member
Messages
49,184
Reaction score
51,958
I think if the team sacks him just once, it'll exceed last year's game's production. So, like a couple others have intimated, Micah will force a sack, but who actually gets the sack will probably not be him.

1 sack by the team, zero for Micah, but more than a handful of hurries.
Have you not seen what happened to their OLine?
 

kskboys

Well-Known Member
Messages
49,184
Reaction score
51,958
Why zero with this defense if Brady had a healthy offensive line?
1. Because Brady has gone against some of the best defenders in his 20 plus years in the league. He knows how to get rid of the ball quickly, even if he has to dump it off.
2. Because the Bucs know to game plan against Parson. Maybe Tank or Williams will get a sack. But they would scheme against Parsons.
3. Because Brady has made no-name receivers great. We could get nothing out of Amendola. Brady made him a household name in New England. Brady requires his receivers to be in the right spot. If not, they're not playing. That's really all you need to beat a pass rush. Get the ball out quickly to the receiver who needs to be in his spot at the time the ball arrives.



We'll see. :)
4. Because Brady has lost every playoff game when he was under pressure.
 

SloMo_Joe

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,080
Reaction score
1,176
0 Brady gets rid of the ball too fast unless his team is trailing bad. I don't see them trailing bad in this game.
 

CWR

Well-Known Member
Messages
25,907
Reaction score
37,919
Why zero with this defense if Brady had a healthy offensive line?
1. Because Brady has gone against some of the best defenders in his 20 plus years in the league. He knows how to get rid of the ball quickly, even if he has to dump it off.
2. Because the Bucs know to game plan against Parson. Maybe Tank or Williams will get a sack. But they would scheme against Parsons.
3. Because Brady has made no-name receivers great. We could get nothing out of Amendola. Brady made him a household name in New England. Brady requires his receivers to be in the right spot. If not, they're not playing. That's really all you need to beat a pass rush. Get the ball out quickly to the receiver who needs to be in his spot at the time the ball arrives.



We'll see. :)

Points on Brady are fair. I probably over estimated. Although I'll point out its going to be very difficult to scheme against Parsons, as he can line up in multiple places and attack from nearly anywhere on the field.

The other thing deceptive about Parsons is his ridiculous closing speed. I'm not sure I've ever seen a defender who closes like him, it's a whole different gear, where he explodes the last 3 yards or so. Very fun to watch.

He may not get home as often as I predicted, but he will be chasing him often. Hopefully Diggs and Co can take advantage of a rushed Brady.
 

CWR

Well-Known Member
Messages
25,907
Reaction score
37,919
Parsons needs to shut it. One good rookie season doesn't mean squat. Elliott is the perfect example!

People wanted Dware and Coop to be more vocal. Of course, they want Dez and Parsons to shut it. Lol.
 
Top