TheKey;1337573 said:He played much much better in Miami than he did in Detroit, and he is the main reason why that team had as many wins as they did.
JustSayNotoTO;1337619 said:Harrington sucks, he diddnt play well, he never did in his career. You cant judge Garrett by how he did with 3 complete stiffs that ****** Saban brought in to attempt to be quarterbacks.
adamknite;1337629 said:easy now..... These are just people's opinions no reason to get all upset about them.....
JustSayNotoTO;1337637 said:Who is upset? I am just saying that Harrington sucks, Culpepper sucks, and Cleo Lemon sucks, and that them sucking has nothing to do with Garrett.
chinch;1337654 said:harrington had "good play"
when?
Paniolo22;1337662 said:He beat the bears.
rex's 3 INTs and CHI's 4 fumbles (3 lost) were not important either right?Paniolo22;1337662 said:He beat the bears.
adamknite;1337615 said:Yeah, his numbers make it look like he had a typical Harrington year, but by watching a few games {because my friend is a dolphins fan} he played much better then he did in Detroit IMO. He was still forcing passes but he did improve a lot and did just enough to allow them to win a few games. The season could have been worse without him I believe. As always I could be absolutely wrong, but that's just my opinion.
By the way, I'm not a huge Jason Garrett supporter nor a Joey Harrington supporter, just chiming in on what I saw.
baj1dallas;1337676 said:Did you ever watch him play in Detroit?
He was the same QB in Miami as he was in Detroit. He's always been good at "dink and dunk" but he's incapable of doing anything else and always has been.
You guys and your koolaid.
speedkilz88;1337683 said:If Saban would have been smart enough to sign Brees when he had a chance, just think how good a qb coach Garrett would have been.