BrassCowboy
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 5,808
- Reaction score
- 3,401
Don't know if this has been posted yet, sorry if so. Thought it was interesting.
RW Hitman;3174078 said:http://www.nfl.com/videos/nfl-network-gameday/09000d5d815434f3/Rivarly-revealed
Don't know if this has been posted yet, sorry if so. Thought it was interesting.
Except that the song wasn't stolen. It was purchased. Money exchanged hands. That doesn't happen in theft.FightingIrishman;3174235 said:No it was all about money and TV rights... but whoever wrote that write-up should be shot.
The stealing of the song was precipitated by nothing but money.
Hostile;3174257 said:Except that the song wasn't stolen. It was purchased. Money exchanged hands. That doesn't happen in theft.
Or maybe you used the wrong word.FightingIrishman;3174260 said:Hence the word precipitated Mr. Barrister
I wouldn't care if you used the word chocolate. The fight song was not stolen. You chose a fallacy to stand upon and I knocked you off your perch with a feather.FightingIrishman;3174260 said:Hence the word precipitated Mr. Barrister
windward;3174271 said:Or maybe you used the wrong word.
Seems to be a pattern.windward;3174271 said:Or maybe you used the wrong word.
The word stealing is not an adverb, so wrong again.FightingIrishman;3174277 said:No, it is called verb / adverb association.
It was purchased legally and I couldn't give a rip about any pretenses.FightingIrishman;3174277 said:No, it is called verb / adverb association.
Yet again, you are wrong. Clint Murchison purchased the song from Barnee Breeskin, who composed it. He knew who he was selling the rights to and why he wanted to buy it.FightingIrishman;3174282 said:When you all want to have an intellectually honest conversation about this subject let me know. I am not going to argue grammar.
It was purchased under false pretenses.... period.
ShiningStar;3174293 said:and very 1 sided.
He hasn't got a prayer. He's all over the map and every direction he goes is wrong.ShiningStar;3174293 said:and very 1 sided.