droopdog7
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 7,401
- Reaction score
- 6,072
I feel like way too many posters are using the results to determine whether the game plan was conservative. That’s just plain wrong IMO.
Conservative to me means a bunch of bubble screens or way more running than passing or running on third and long. I didn’t see very much of that at all tonight.
Instead, I saw more pressure in dak than I’d seen this year, an ineffective running game, and a bunch of deep drops where dak surveyed the field and settled. Don’t tell me that dumping the ball off was the game plan. You could certainly see dak looking downfield. He just didn’t throw it down field very often,
One COULD say dak was conservative with his decision making. Perhaps he could have tried to squeeze the ball in more? But it’s also possible that the receivers weren’t getting open. Indeed, that’s most likely.
But lack of deep balls doesn’t mean the plan was conservative necessarily.
Conservative to me means a bunch of bubble screens or way more running than passing or running on third and long. I didn’t see very much of that at all tonight.
Instead, I saw more pressure in dak than I’d seen this year, an ineffective running game, and a bunch of deep drops where dak surveyed the field and settled. Don’t tell me that dumping the ball off was the game plan. You could certainly see dak looking downfield. He just didn’t throw it down field very often,
One COULD say dak was conservative with his decision making. Perhaps he could have tried to squeeze the ball in more? But it’s also possible that the receivers weren’t getting open. Indeed, that’s most likely.
But lack of deep balls doesn’t mean the plan was conservative necessarily.
