noletime95
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 3,136
- Reaction score
- 2,043
i'm stating the obvious when I suggest these are the two cornerstones of the franchise. Ware is probably the better player, but Romo is probably more important (we've learned the hard way you can't win without a QB).
Barring a carreer threatening type of injury to either, how long does the window stay open for this era for the Cowboys to win another Super Bowl?
QB's have shown the ability to play well into their mid or even late 30's, so Tony should have another 4 years or so at least. My only concern is how much of Romo's game is dependent upon his elusivness. But he's shown the ability to kill teams from the pocket as well.
Ware's game is largely predicated on being the best athlete on the field. That's not going to last as long. Who knows, since the guy is a freak he may continue playing at a high level well into his 30's. I'm guessing another 3 years or so as a premier pass rusher?
Man, I sure wish Garrett had a little more time with these two, but 3-4 seasons is a nice window indeed. Thoughts?
Barring a carreer threatening type of injury to either, how long does the window stay open for this era for the Cowboys to win another Super Bowl?
QB's have shown the ability to play well into their mid or even late 30's, so Tony should have another 4 years or so at least. My only concern is how much of Romo's game is dependent upon his elusivness. But he's shown the ability to kill teams from the pocket as well.
Ware's game is largely predicated on being the best athlete on the field. That's not going to last as long. Who knows, since the guy is a freak he may continue playing at a high level well into his 30's. I'm guessing another 3 years or so as a premier pass rusher?
Man, I sure wish Garrett had a little more time with these two, but 3-4 seasons is a nice window indeed. Thoughts?
