BAT
Mr. Fixit
- Messages
- 19,443
- Reaction score
- 15,607
Wow, not a good talent evaluator.
SMH
15 pro bowlers, 2 SB championships in FIVE years.
And his players and assistants were able to win a 3rd championship with basically Jimmy's players, Jimmy's assistants, offense, defense and ST two years later.
Troy, Emmitt, Irvin and many more of his former players all swear that if Jimmy does not leave, Cowboys win another 3 Superbowls. Minimum.
If only Jimmy was actually any good at talent evaluation what miracles he could have accomplished amirite?
Maybe a decades long historical SB run like that other poor talent evaluator Bill Belichick right?
SMH
15 pro bowlers, 2 SB championships in FIVE years.
And his players and assistants were able to win a 3rd championship with basically Jimmy's players, Jimmy's assistants, offense, defense and ST two years later.
Troy, Emmitt, Irvin and many more of his former players all swear that if Jimmy does not leave, Cowboys win another 3 Superbowls. Minimum.
If only Jimmy was actually any good at talent evaluation what miracles he could have accomplished amirite?
Maybe a decades long historical SB run like that other poor talent evaluator Bill Belichick right?
I know you would love to distill the entire argument down to this and claim victory but it's not a rational argument. I forget the name of the fallacy but it is pretty basic. Occam's razor is a means not the end.
Am I arguing that Johnson didn't earn those championships in Dallas? Nah. I am just saying that he was not a good talent evaluator. Now we have this red herring because you see the denominator too and don't want to admit it.