Humor: NFL is changing their organization name

nathanlt

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,042
Reaction score
3,045
The new organization is called the National Public Perception League, where public perception is the name of the game.

Until recently, sports and football especially was an opportunity to escape from the mundane and controversial. Now, the league jumps headfirst into those kinds of issues. Never mind the proverb, "if you try to please everybody, you'll end up pleasing nobody"

So, welcome NPPL, which looks suspiciously like No People, as in No People will be watching the game.
 

Supercowboy1986

Well-Known Member
Messages
3,204
Reaction score
3,022
How many of you relate to this?

I have been a fan of the Cowboys all my life, never missed a game to this point.

However, I have never used nor thought of football as an "escape." I've heard this mentioned a couple of times but it's a sentiment I cannot relate to and at the moment do not understand.

What are you and others escaping from exactly?

The new organization is called the National Public Perception League, where public perception is the name of the game.

Until recently, sports and football especially was an opportunity to escape from the mundane and controversial. Now, the league jumps headfirst into those kinds of issues. Never mind the proverb, "if you try to please everybody, you'll end up pleasing nobody"

So, welcome NPPL, which looks suspiciously like No People, as in No People will be watching the game.
 

CowboysRule

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,590
Reaction score
5,176
It's just a chance to forget everything that's going on in the world and just watch a nice game. However, now everything has to politicized and things foreign to the actual game are being talked about more than the game. It's disappointing but it's the way of the world. TMZ is popular because some people are into that sort of thing. I am not.
 

jwooten15

Well-Known Member
Messages
17,187
Reaction score
40,860
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
Yet the owners are wanting to give Gooddell $50million/year and a private jet for helping run the NPPL into the ground

I have a feeling most of the owners feel this dip in ratings and all the drama is just a phase - and that the NFL will come back stronger than ever. But I don't think that's the case.. They may be allowing things to go to a place of no return
 

Vanilla2

Well-Known Member
Messages
8,616
Reaction score
9,035
How many of you relate to this?

I have been a fan of the Cowboys all my life, never missed a game to this point.

However, I have never used nor thought of football as an "escape." I've heard this mentioned a couple of times but it's a sentiment I cannot relate to and at the moment do not understand.

What are you and others escaping from exactly?

It’s a talking point of the indoctrinated.
 

Shake_Tiller

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,438
Reaction score
1,563
How many of you relate to this?

I have been a fan of the Cowboys all my life, never missed a game to this point.

However, I have never used nor thought of football as an "escape." I've heard this mentioned a couple of times but it's a sentiment I cannot relate to and at the moment do not understand.

What are you and others escaping from exactly?
I think "escape" is convenient shorthand for many of us to describe our attachment to the game. I can sit for three hours, watch a Cowboys football game, feel a broad range of emotions -- excitement, joy, anger, pathos, etc. -- and at the end of the game, my life hasn't changed. My mortgage hasn't grown. Job circumstances haven't changed. "Real life" hasn't been materially affected.

Football is, or at least was, a trip to the amusement park. It is, or was, an emotional diversion, which is healthy. Emotional release is healthy for human beings, and football is/was an opportunity to relieve real stress.

In my view, this is why so many of us are truly angry about present circumstances. Our political views are peripheral. Our stances regarding labor issues are peripheral. Our feelings about officiating and rules interpretation are peripheral. Perhaps it would be better to describe those and the other negative feelings about the NFL as derivative. We love the game, and the game is being distorted and pushed to the background.

Some of this is surely unalterable. The impact of concussions on player health is a "real life" problem over which the league has limited control, for instance. Twenty-four hour news saturation that thrives on the foibles of celebrities, politicians and athletes won't be erased regardless of who is commissioner. Social media has opened windows that won't be closed.

But the league can do one thing -- it can stop contributing to the larger problem. This is one area in which Roger Javert Goodell has been an utter failure. He has chosen to take sides in social wars; not personally, which is his right, but under the guise of the ridiculous Shield, which is in and of itself symbolic to me of the corruption and hubris of the NFL.

Goodell has foisted upon many fans a "new" product that has changed both the game and the experience of the game, which for many of us, and for myriad reasons, we do not like. He has turned the amusement park into a social debate forum, and we do not care to visit. Most of us are intelligent and aware enough to appreciate the need for such debate, but we all want to go to an amusement park now and then.

Beyond that, the hapless commissioner, has allowed his monumental ego and moral certitude to impact the game experience in ways we do not enjoy. All of the while, he has proven himself to be close-minded and unwilling to accept criticism or correction. And he has done all of this while brandishing power that while apparently legally defensible, to this point, is in no way morally defensible. He is a man in a bubble filled with his own brand of liquid elitism and hypocrisy. He thrives by drinking of it. He breathes power and disgorges a gas poison to a game which has provided so many of us lasting memories and constant entertainment.

The commissioner has thrived on his relationships with and ability to manipulate a sports media that will, in its collective mind, speak truth to power -- unless the power is held by sources and contacts that can have a positive impact on the careers of media members. The NFL can and does contribute through its own powerful media arm, and independent reporters have bizarrely embraced the league's propagandists as if they were legitimate members of independent organizations. Most in the NFL media -- not all - are sell-outs who would rather ridicule antagonists such as Jerry Jones than offend the power of a corrupt and broken Shield.

Most in the media would rather see a young man such as Ezekiel Elliott tried and convicted on vaporous "evidence" than challenge the league that feeds their pocketbooks. Many will fall back on their own moral superiority and on a window-dressed panel of so-called league "experts" to nod their near-vacant heads and say "well, clearly Elliott deserved what he received" because, well, because he does... and to Dante's Inferno with our own rule of law and the fundamental fairness which it demands. They would rather, in the end, fall back on legalistic defenses -- "Well the collective bargaining agreement..." than to argue basic right or wrong. They choose to ignore the naked emperor because it is convenient to do so.

Many of the owners would rather count their booty than to stop for a moment and ask themselves -- "Hang on there, why did a judge compare the search for fairness in this case to the elusive hunt for the proverbial needle in a haystack?" And the commissioner himself, rather than displaying the moral courage and self-awareness to ask himself the same question, doubles down as always merely to prove again his ability to flex muscle and to decide for all what is right.

And so it goes, and so many of us finally say, "Enough. You have taken something we loved and molded into a nearly beastly thing we can'[t recognize and truly do not embrace. You are asking us to walk through thistles to reach a roller coaster that no longer extends as high or offers as many thrills. And you have done this while arrogantly brandishing the Shield, which you have manipulated into a personal sword for an egomaniac."

And here is what the NFL wants; it wants us to behave as the poet Stephen Crane described --

In the desert
I saw a creature, naked, bestial,
Who, squatting upon the ground,
Held his heart in his hands,
And ate of it.
I said, “Is it good, friend?”
“It is bitter—bitter,” he answered;

“But I like it
“Because it is bitter,
“And because it is my heart.”

Because it is our heart, they expect us to eat of it, regardless the bitter taste. And if a few raggedy, non-conforming owners raise an objection, they wield again the corrupt and decayed Shield.
 

John813

Well-Known Member
Messages
23,735
Reaction score
36,775
I honestly never felt like politics was being shoved into my face when watching football games.

The politics were shoved into our face by people talking about it after the fact.

I agree.
The only part of what is getting "old" about the NFL is Goodell and his unlimited power.
From the Saints Bountygate, Brady, and Zeke to name a few. One thing if Zeke went on trial, and all of a sudden the victim goes awol... sure give him 6 games. But no legal charges, let alone a trial and your own investigator says no punishment needed. Yet, to please the few, he suspends him anyways.

I still "escape" per say, but the hype for waiting for the game has died down.
Used to count the days till the draft, TC, regular season, not anymore.
 

Staubacher

Well-Known Member
Messages
12,316
Reaction score
23,745
Stadiums are half empty, LA teams are a bust. Product is watered down so much that about 2 games a week are worth watching. Thursday night and Monday night games have been awful. The NFL has the Miami Dolphins on national broadcasts every week and they are the worst offense in football with a joke of a QB. Goodell and Co. mismanaged one man's personal protest into polarizing the fan base so badly that no matter what happens now half the fans are turned off. Good players are retiring early so as not to wind up drooling and catatonic from brain injury. Officiating is at an all time low. Most games are boring and interminably long.
 

Reverend Conehead

Well-Known Member
Messages
9,953
Reaction score
11,860
The new organization is called the National Public Perception League, where public perception is the name of the game.

Until recently, sports and football especially was an opportunity to escape from the mundane and controversial. Now, the league jumps headfirst into those kinds of issues. Never mind the proverb, "if you try to please everybody, you'll end up pleasing nobody"

So, welcome NPPL, which looks suspiciously like No People, as in No People will be watching the game.

Alternative proposed named was the National Feminazi League.
 

jazzcat22

Staff member
Messages
81,320
Reaction score
102,265
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
I honestly never felt like politics was being shoved into my face when watching football games.

The politics were shoved into our face by people talking about it after the fact.

People need to wake up. The NFL and Goodell just flexed their muscles by getting into politics and became their own police state after rail roading Zeke. And it is not our faces where they are shoving it. Try a few feet down and to the back side.
 

Melonfeud

I Copy!,,, er,,,I guess,,,ah,,,maybe.
Messages
21,976
Reaction score
33,152
How many of you relate to this?

I have been a fan of the Cowboys all my life, never missed a game to this point.

However, I have never used nor thought of football as an "escape." I've heard this mentioned a couple of times but it's a sentiment I cannot relate to and at the moment do not understand.

What are you and others escaping from exactly?
I couldn't tell you,myself Super86, as cowboy football is and pretty much always has been as much a part of my life as knowing you need a front end alignment on yer F-100,,,er,,,150 Ford pickup truck,,, ya,I've been a fan for awhileo_O
 

Melonfeud

I Copy!,,, er,,,I guess,,,ah,,,maybe.
Messages
21,976
Reaction score
33,152
I think "escape" is convenient shorthand for many of us to describe our attachment to the game. I can sit for three hours, watch a Cowboys football game, feel a broad range of emotions -- excitement, joy, anger, pathos, etc. -- and at the end of the game, my life hasn't changed. My mortgage hasn't grown. Job circumstances haven't changed. "Real life" hasn't been materially affected.

Football is, or at least was, a trip to the amusement park. It is, or was, an emotional diversion, which is healthy. Emotional release is healthy for human beings, and football is/was an opportunity to relieve real stress.

In my view, this is why so many of us are truly angry about present circumstances. Our political views are peripheral. Our stances regarding labor issues are peripheral. Our feelings about officiating and rules interpretation are peripheral. Perhaps it would be better to describe those and the other negative feelings about the NFL as derivative. We love the game, and the game is being distorted and pushed to the background.

Some of this is surely unalterable. The impact of concussions on player health is a "real life" problem over which the league has limited control, for instance. Twenty-four hour news saturation that thrives on the foibles of celebrities, politicians and athletes won't be erased regardless of who is commissioner. Social media has opened windows that won't be closed.

But the league can do one thing -- it can stop contributing to the larger problem. This is one area in which Roger Javert Goodell has been an utter failure. He has chosen to take sides in social wars; not personally, which is his right, but under the guise of the ridiculous Shield, which is in and of itself symbolic to me of the corruption and hubris of the NFL.

Goodell has foisted upon many fans a "new" product that has changed both the game and the experience of the game, which for many of us, and for myriad reasons, we do not like. He has turned the amusement park into a social debate forum, and we do not care to visit. Most of us are intelligent and aware enough to appreciate the need for such debate, but we all want to go to an amusement park now and then.

Beyond that, the hapless commissioner, has allowed his monumental ego and moral certitude to impact the game experience in ways we do not enjoy. All of the while, he has proven himself to be close-minded and unwilling to accept criticism or correction. And he has done all of this while brandishing power that while apparently legally defensible, to this point, is in no way morally defensible. He is a man in a bubble filled with his own brand of liquid elitism and hypocrisy. He thrives by drinking of it. He breathes power and disgorges a gas poison to a game which has provided so many of us lasting memories and constant entertainment.

The commissioner has thrived on his relationships with and ability to manipulate a sports media that will, in its collective mind, speak truth to power -- unless the power is held by sources and contacts that can have a positive impact on the careers of media members. The NFL can and does contribute through its own powerful media arm, and independent reporters have bizarrely embraced the league's propagandists as if they were legitimate members of independent organizations. Most in the NFL media -- not all - are sell-outs who would rather ridicule antagonists such as Jerry Jones than offend the power of a corrupt and broken Shield.

Most in the media would rather see a young man such as Ezekiel Elliott tried and convicted on vaporous "evidence" than challenge the league that feeds their pocketbooks. Many will fall back on their own moral superiority and on a window-dressed panel of so-called league "experts" to nod their near-vacant heads and say "well, clearly Elliott deserved what he received" because, well, because he does... and to Dante's Inferno with our own rule of law and the fundamental fairness which it demands. They would rather, in the end, fall back on legalistic defenses -- "Well the collective bargaining agreement..." than to argue basic right or wrong. They choose to ignore the naked emperor because it is convenient to do so.

Many of the owners would rather count their booty than to stop for a moment and ask themselves -- "Hang on there, why did a judge compare the search for fairness in this case to the elusive hunt for the proverbial needle in a haystack?" And the commissioner himself, rather than displaying the moral courage and self-awareness to ask himself the same question, doubles down as always merely to prove again his ability to flex muscle and to decide for all what is right.

And so it goes, and so many of us finally say, "Enough. You have taken something we loved and molded into a nearly beastly thing we can'[t recognize and truly do not embrace. You are asking us to walk through thistles to reach a roller coaster that no longer extends as high or offers as many thrills. And you have done this while arrogantly brandishing the Shield, which you have manipulated into a personal sword for an egomaniac."

And here is what the NFL wants; it wants us to behave as the poet Stephen Crane described --

In the desert
I saw a creature, naked, bestial,
Who, squatting upon the ground,
Held his heart in his hands,
And ate of it.
I said, “Is it good, friend?”
“It is bitter—bitter,” he answered;

“But I like it
“Because it is bitter,
“And because it is my heart.”

Because it is our heart, they expect us to eat of it, regardless the bitter taste. And if a few raggedy, non-conforming owners raise an objection, they wield again the corrupt and decayed Shield.

,,,:huh:,,, I wept, I freaked, I peaked out like on the beginning of a decent cid trip, I wigged out, I laughed, I was pole axed, I was turned stone cold inside, I felt the rising wave of peaking again, I laughed hilariously, I raged for righteous retribution, I yearned for a olive loaf luncheon meat sandwich with miracle whip on plain white bread, I LIVED while embracing this POSTo_O

:lmao::lmao2::lmao:

Actually, DuDe! That's some commendable casing-liner you put out there for us,,,:thumbup:
 

jazzcat22

Staff member
Messages
81,320
Reaction score
102,265
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
How many of you relate to this?

I have been a fan of the Cowboys all my life, never missed a game to this point.

However, I have never used nor thought of football as an "escape." I've heard this mentioned a couple of times but it's a sentiment I cannot relate to and at the moment do not understand.

What are you and others escaping from exactly?

I never really seen is an escape from life either. It is entertainment of a sport I love to watch more than other sports. Maybe escape is not the right word as it was used. More of a relaxing past time that gets us riled up at the same time as well as frustrated or elated.

Elated when winning, frustrated when losing.

However I am extremely satisfied I "escaped" from my PSL's and season tickets for even a break even price. Well I think I made about $8.00, so that gets me what, 2 cups of coffee at Starbucks, or 8 cups and better coffee at McDonalds. :lmao:
 

rags747

Well-Known Member
Messages
8,231
Reaction score
8,702
How many of you relate to this?

I have been a fan of the Cowboys all my life, never missed a game to this point.

However, I have never used nor thought of football as an "escape." I've heard this mentioned a couple of times but it's a sentiment I cannot relate to and at the moment do not understand.

What are you and others escaping from exactly?
Well #1 would be politics, I specifically tune into a game to see teamwork and everything else associated with the sport of football. If I need to get my fix of what is going on in the world then FOX is a click away on the remote. It's all very simple.
 

rags747

Well-Known Member
Messages
8,231
Reaction score
8,702
I think "escape" is convenient shorthand for many of us to describe our attachment to the game. I can sit for three hours, watch a Cowboys football game, feel a broad range of emotions -- excitement, joy, anger, pathos, etc. -- and at the end of the game, my life hasn't changed. My mortgage hasn't grown. Job circumstances haven't changed. "Real life" hasn't been materially affected.

Football is, or at least was, a trip to the amusement park. It is, or was, an emotional diversion, which is healthy. Emotional release is healthy for human beings, and football is/was an opportunity to relieve real stress.

In my view, this is why so many of us are truly angry about present circumstances. Our political views are peripheral. Our stances regarding labor issues are peripheral. Our feelings about officiating and rules interpretation are peripheral. Perhaps it would be better to describe those and the other negative feelings about the NFL as derivative. We love the game, and the game is being distorted and pushed to the background.

Some of this is surely unalterable. The impact of concussions on player health is a "real life" problem over which the league has limited control, for instance. Twenty-four hour news saturation that thrives on the foibles of celebrities, politicians and athletes won't be erased regardless of who is commissioner. Social media has opened windows that won't be closed.

But the league can do one thing -- it can stop contributing to the larger problem. This is one area in which Roger Javert Goodell has been an utter failure. He has chosen to take sides in social wars; not personally, which is his right, but under the guise of the ridiculous Shield, which is in and of itself symbolic to me of the corruption and hubris of the NFL.

Goodell has foisted upon many fans a "new" product that has changed both the game and the experience of the game, which for many of us, and for myriad reasons, we do not like. He has turned the amusement park into a social debate forum, and we do not care to visit. Most of us are intelligent and aware enough to appreciate the need for such debate, but we all want to go to an amusement park now and then.

Beyond that, the hapless commissioner, has allowed his monumental ego and moral certitude to impact the game experience in ways we do not enjoy. All of the while, he has proven himself to be close-minded and unwilling to accept criticism or correction. And he has done all of this while brandishing power that while apparently legally defensible, to this point, is in no way morally defensible. He is a man in a bubble filled with his own brand of liquid elitism and hypocrisy. He thrives by drinking of it. He breathes power and disgorges a gas poison to a game which has provided so many of us lasting memories and constant entertainment.

The commissioner has thrived on his relationships with and ability to manipulate a sports media that will, in its collective mind, speak truth to power -- unless the power is held by sources and contacts that can have a positive impact on the careers of media members. The NFL can and does contribute through its own powerful media arm, and independent reporters have bizarrely embraced the league's propagandists as if they were legitimate members of independent organizations. Most in the NFL media -- not all - are sell-outs who would rather ridicule antagonists such as Jerry Jones than offend the power of a corrupt and broken Shield.

Most in the media would rather see a young man such as Ezekiel Elliott tried and convicted on vaporous "evidence" than challenge the league that feeds their pocketbooks. Many will fall back on their own moral superiority and on a window-dressed panel of so-called league "experts" to nod their near-vacant heads and say "well, clearly Elliott deserved what he received" because, well, because he does... and to Dante's Inferno with our own rule of law and the fundamental fairness which it demands. They would rather, in the end, fall back on legalistic defenses -- "Well the collective bargaining agreement..." than to argue basic right or wrong. They choose to ignore the naked emperor because it is convenient to do so.

Many of the owners would rather count their booty than to stop for a moment and ask themselves -- "Hang on there, why did a judge compare the search for fairness in this case to the elusive hunt for the proverbial needle in a haystack?" And the commissioner himself, rather than displaying the moral courage and self-awareness to ask himself the same question, doubles down as always merely to prove again his ability to flex muscle and to decide for all what is right.

And so it goes, and so many of us finally say, "Enough. You have taken something we loved and molded into a nearly beastly thing we can'[t recognize and truly do not embrace. You are asking us to walk through thistles to reach a roller coaster that no longer extends as high or offers as many thrills. And you have done this while arrogantly brandishing the Shield, which you have manipulated into a personal sword for an egomaniac."

And here is what the NFL wants; it wants us to behave as the poet Stephen Crane described --

In the desert
I saw a creature, naked, bestial,
Who, squatting upon the ground,
Held his heart in his hands,
And ate of it.
I said, “Is it good, friend?”
“It is bitter—bitter,” he answered;

“But I like it
“Because it is bitter,
“And because it is my heart.”

Because it is our heart, they expect us to eat of it, regardless the bitter taste. And if a few raggedy, non-conforming owners raise an objection, they wield again the corrupt and decayed Shield.
Excellent post, pretty much sums up my feelings exactly
 

HungryLion

Well-Known Member
Messages
28,745
Reaction score
64,774
People need to wake up. The NFL and Goodell just flexed their muscles by getting into politics and became their own police state after rail roading Zeke. And it is not our faces where they are shoving it. Try a few feet down and to the back side.

I see what you’re saying. But I don’t think the Zeke thing is about politics. At least that’s not how I see it.

Roger Goodell and nfl owners don’t give a damn about domestic violence. They don’t. They don’t give a flying F about the victims of
Domestic violence. They just did it to appease people.

The Zeke case is all about Roger Goodell and other owners in the league abusing their power.
 

Fletch

To The Moon
Messages
18,395
Reaction score
14,042
How many of you relate to this?

I have been a fan of the Cowboys all my life, never missed a game to this point.

However, I have never used nor thought of football as an "escape." I've heard this mentioned a couple of times but it's a sentiment I cannot relate to and at the moment do not understand.

What are you and others escaping from exactly?
If you no savy. Then you’ll never savy.
 

panchucko

It's Back
Messages
4,341
Reaction score
2,803
Sunday’s during football season was my day, my day to get away from the rat race and enjoy some que and suds and friends. This year I have no friends that come over I don’t watch any games if the cowboys aren’t playing. I tried avoiding the start of the game to minimize the bull crap politics and such, but the darn announcers keep bringing it up. This past week I watched 3/4 of the game on mute because I couldn’t stand the bringing stuff up

I want my get away day back but I doubt it happens anytime soon
 
Top