btcutter
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 5,322
- Reaction score
- 2,605
Unless James, Smith or Vela falls to us I think this FO will be taking Hurst if his health checks out. Hurst will likely be the highest rated DL on board when we pick. Not only is he a excellent 3 tech and will work into rotation with Irving, Collins and Price but he also protects us against Irving leaving if he so chooses. This is also not a deep class for 3 tech but a very deep class for 1 tech. Based on this FO hx, FO doesn't value 1 tech in the 1st round.
We also have temporarily addressed WR issue and this is a deep WR class. We can get better value at WR in rounds 2-4 much like DT. Neither Ridley nor Moore are true burners which is what we really need.
Obviously we don't know how much this FO likes LVE but again better value in 2-4. Furthermore, the LB we pick is hopefully primarily a backup for Lee and Smith so why use a 1st rounder for that. Yes, Lee has injury hx and Smith is an enigma but still if we shore up the front 4 then it frees up LBs to flow to the ball.
I can also see the rationale for taking Landry as you never have enough pass rushers. He's already better than Taco. He also protects against Lawrence who's on a 1 yr deal not to mention a iffy back.
Just some random thoughts.
We also have temporarily addressed WR issue and this is a deep WR class. We can get better value at WR in rounds 2-4 much like DT. Neither Ridley nor Moore are true burners which is what we really need.
Obviously we don't know how much this FO likes LVE but again better value in 2-4. Furthermore, the LB we pick is hopefully primarily a backup for Lee and Smith so why use a 1st rounder for that. Yes, Lee has injury hx and Smith is an enigma but still if we shore up the front 4 then it frees up LBs to flow to the ball.
I can also see the rationale for taking Landry as you never have enough pass rushers. He's already better than Taco. He also protects against Lawrence who's on a 1 yr deal not to mention a iffy back.
Just some random thoughts.
