I think it is pretty deep. We should think about developing talent behind Smith and Collins. Not holding my breath on Steele and Knight.
Fisher basically said yesterday, via his sources, both Tyron/Collins are expected to be healthy starters next season. This eases some concerns, where taking a future starter rather then more of an immediate starter seems like the best coarse of action. Good depth at Tackle, will allow them to take one somewhere within the first 4 rounds.
If Tyron can still play at a high level, just misses his usual 4 games and is on a team friendly contract, there is no reason to try to replace him. Sure, they have to start developing a future starter at the position, but unless a quality prospect falls to them early, they can fill sometime day 2 or early day 3.Tyron Smith also said heading into last season that it was the best he had felt in years.
Fisher basically said yesterday, via his sources, both Tyron/Collins are expected to be healthy starters next season. This eases some concerns, where taking a future starter rather then more of an immediate starter seems like the best coarse of action. Good depth at Tackle, will allow them to take one somewhere within the first 4 rounds.
That certainly looks like the best way to address the position and have a plan in place for the future.Yep. That is what I am thinking. If Smith and Collins are expected to be healthy, we can get guys with comp 3 and later to sit for a year or two and play swing tackle and be ready when Smith is ready to call it a career.
Can still get D with the first three.
If Tyron can still play at a high level, just misses his usual 4 games and is on a team friendly contract, there is no reason to try to replace him. Sure, they have to start developing a future starter at the position, but unless a quality prospect falls to them early, they can fill sometime day 2 or early day 3.