Page Time: 0.0615s

Memory: 2.9498 MB (Peak: 3.9803 MB)

Queries (29, time: 0.0191s, 31.1%)

  1. SELECT data_key, data_value
    FROM xf_data_registry
    WHERE data_key IN ('options', 'languages', 'contentTypes', 'codeEventListeners', 'deferredRun', 'simpleCache', 'addOns', 'defaultStyleProperties', 'routeFiltersIn', 'routeFiltersOut', 'routesPublic', 'nodeTypes', 'bannedIps', 'discouragedIps', 'styles', 'displayStyles', 'userBanners', 'smilies', 'bbCode', 'threadPrefixes', 'userTitleLadder', 'reportCounts', 'moderationCounts', 'userModerationCounts', 'notices', 'userFieldsInfo')
    Run Time: 0.000411
    Select TypeTableTypePossible KeysKeyKey LenRefRowsExtra
    SIMPLExf_data_registryALLPRIMARY   36Using where
  2. SELECT cache_value
    FROM xf_permission_combination
    WHERE permission_combination_id = ?
    Params: 1
    Run Time: 0.000180
    Select TypeTableTypePossible KeysKeyKey LenRefRowsExtra
    SIMPLExf_permission_combinationconstPRIMARYPRIMARY4const1 
  3. SELECT thread.*
    	,
    		user.gender, user.avatar_date, user.gravatar,
    		NULL AS thread_read_date,
    		0 AS thread_reply_banned,
    		0 AS thread_is_watched,
    		'' AS draft_message, NULL AS draft_extra
    FROM xf_thread AS thread
    
    		LEFT JOIN xf_user AS user ON
    			(user.user_id = thread.user_id)
    WHERE thread.thread_id = ?
    Params: 396223
    Run Time: 0.000293
    Select TypeTableTypePossible KeysKeyKey LenRefRowsExtra
    SIMPLEthreadconstPRIMARYPRIMARY4const1 
    SIMPLEuserconstPRIMARYPRIMARY4const1 
  4. SELECT node.*, forum.*
    	,
    	permission.cache_value AS node_permission_cache,
    		NULL AS forum_read_date
    FROM xf_forum AS forum
    INNER JOIN xf_node AS node ON (node.node_id = forum.node_id)
    
    	LEFT JOIN xf_permission_cache_content AS permission
    		ON (permission.permission_combination_id = 1
    			AND permission.content_type = 'node'
    			AND permission.content_id = forum.node_id)
    WHERE node.node_id = ?
    Params: 57
    Run Time: 0.000327
    Select TypeTableTypePossible KeysKeyKey LenRefRowsExtra
    SIMPLEforumconstPRIMARYPRIMARY4const1 
    SIMPLEnodeconstPRIMARYPRIMARY4const1 
    SIMPLEpermissionconstPRIMARYPRIMARY35const,const,const1 
  5. SELECT post.*
    	,
    		bb_code_parse_cache.parse_tree AS message_parsed, bb_code_parse_cache.cache_version AS message_cache_version,
    		user.*, IF(user.username IS NULL, post.username, user.username) AS username,
    		user_profile.*,
    		user_privacy.*,
    		signature_parse_cache.parse_tree AS signature_parsed, bb_code_parse_cache.cache_version AS signature_cache_version,
    		session_activity.view_date AS last_view_date,
    		0 AS like_date
    FROM xf_post AS post
    
    		LEFT JOIN xf_bb_code_parse_cache AS bb_code_parse_cache ON
    			(bb_code_parse_cache.content_type = 'post' AND bb_code_parse_cache.content_id = post.post_id)
    		LEFT JOIN xf_user AS user ON
    			(user.user_id = post.user_id)
    		LEFT JOIN xf_user_profile AS user_profile ON
    			(user_profile.user_id = post.user_id)
    		LEFT JOIN xf_user_privacy AS user_privacy ON
    			(user_privacy.user_id = post.user_id)
    		LEFT JOIN xf_bb_code_parse_cache AS signature_parse_cache ON
    			(signature_parse_cache.content_type = 'signature' AND signature_parse_cache.content_id = post.user_id)
    		LEFT JOIN xf_session_activity AS session_activity ON
    			(post.user_id > 0 AND session_activity.user_id = post.user_id AND session_activity.unique_key = CAST(post.user_id AS BINARY))
    WHERE post.thread_id = ?
    	 AND (post.position >= 2840 AND post.position < 2860) 
    	AND (post.message_state IN ('visible'))
    ORDER BY post.position ASC, post.post_date ASC
    Params: 396223
    Run Time: 0.002252
    Select TypeTableTypePossible KeysKeyKey LenRefRowsExtra
    SIMPLEpostrangethread_id_post_date,thread_id_positionthread_id_position8 21Using index condition; Using where; Using filesort
    SIMPLEbb_code_parse_cacheeq_refcontent_type_idcontent_type_id31const,cowboyszone.post.post_id1Using where
    SIMPLEusereq_refPRIMARYPRIMARY4cowboyszone.post.user_id1 
    SIMPLEuser_profileeq_refPRIMARYPRIMARY4cowboyszone.post.user_id1 
    SIMPLEuser_privacyeq_refPRIMARYPRIMARY4cowboyszone.post.user_id1 
    SIMPLEsignature_parse_cacheeq_refcontent_type_idcontent_type_id31const,cowboyszone.post.user_id1Using where
    SIMPLEsession_activityeq_refPRIMARYPRIMARY22cowboyszone.post.user_id,func1Using where
  6. INSERT DELAYED INTO xf_thread_view
    	(thread_id)
    VALUES
    	(?)
    Params: 396223
    Run Time: 0.000108
  7. INSERT INTO `xf_session` (`session_id`, `session_data`, `expiry_date`) VALUES (?, ?, ?)
    Params: 57dd48923e9557cf35a827d48b28019d, , 1606891545
    Run Time: 0.000192
  8. INSERT INTO xf_session_activity
    	(user_id, unique_key, ip, controller_name, controller_action, view_state, params, view_date, robot_key)
    VALUES
    	(?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?)
    ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE
    	ip = VALUES(ip),
    	controller_name = VALUES(controller_name),
    	controller_action = VALUES(controller_action),
    	view_state = VALUES(view_state),
    	params = VALUES(params),
    	view_date = VALUES(view_date),
    	robot_key = VALUES(robot_key)
    Params: 0, , , XenForo_ControllerPublic_Thread, Index, valid, thread_id=396223&page=143, 1606887945,
    Run Time: 0.000111
  9. SELECT title, template_compiled
    FROM xf_template_compiled
    WHERE title IN ('page_nav', 'bb_code_tag_code', 'bb_code_tag_php', 'bb_code_tag_html', 'bb_code_tag_quote', 'bb_code_tag_attach', 'bb_code_tag_spoiler', 'thread_view', 'dark_taigachat', 'dark_taigachat_list', 'siropu_custom_tabs_child_list', 'PAGE_CONTAINER')
    	AND style_id = ?
    	AND language_id = ?
    Params: 1, 1
    Run Time: 0.000392
    Select TypeTableTypePossible KeysKeyKey LenRefRowsExtra
    SIMPLExf_template_compiledrangePRIMARYPRIMARY60 12Using where
  10. INSERT INTO xf_bb_code_parse_cache
    	(content_type, content_id, parse_tree, cache_version, cache_date)
    VALUES (?, ?, ?, ?, ?)
    ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE parse_tree = VALUES(parse_tree),
    	cache_version = VALUES(cache_version),
    	cache_date = VALUES(cache_date)
    Params: post, 7950321, a:2:{i:0;a:4:{s:3:"tag";s:5:"quote";s:6:"option";s:35:"OmerV, post: 7945262, member: 38004";s:8:"original";a:2:{i:0;s:45:"[QUOTE="OmerV, post: 7945262, member: 38004"]";i:1;s:8:"[/QUOTE]";}s:8:"children";a:1:{i:0;s:451:"What if contact isn't made? That's the scenario I put out there. If an airborn player could establish possession, and the ball popped free immediately upon hitting the ground, and he hadn't been touched, it would be a fumble. I also put out the scenario of a player jumping for the ball and the split second his feet contact the ground he either loses the ball or gets hit and the ball pops away - that would be a fumble again under your scenario.";}}i:1;s:207:"That's easy. If contact was not made, he is a runner by virtue of having taken a 3rd step and diving for the goal line, ground cannot cause a fumble, he was untouched and rolled into the end zone. Touchdown.";}, 1520495005, 1606887945
    Run Time: 0.001155
  11. INSERT INTO xf_bb_code_parse_cache
    	(content_type, content_id, parse_tree, cache_version, cache_date)
    VALUES (?, ?, ?, ?, ?)
    ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE parse_tree = VALUES(parse_tree),
    	cache_version = VALUES(cache_version),
    	cache_date = VALUES(cache_date)
    Params: post, 7950339, a:2:{i:0;a:4:{s:3:"tag";s:5:"quote";s:6:"option";s:38:"BlindFaith, post: 7945521, member: 463";s:8:"original";a:2:{i:0;s:48:"[QUOTE="BlindFaith, post: 7945521, member: 463"]";i:1;s:8:"[/QUOTE]";}s:8:"children";a:1:{i:0;s:479:"We'll just have to agree to disagree. If the ref making the initial call didn't see the ball hit the ground, then there was indisputable evidence that it did and it moved. Exactly why replay is there. If the ref didn't think Dez was going to the ground, then again, it was indisputable that he was. Exactly why replay is there. The only thing that can, and is, being argued is Dez regain his balance at any time before the lunge. He clearly never did. It's really that simple.";}}i:1;s:1238:"Serious questions...If it is indisputable why is the NFL backtracking and saying it is a catch, and they are going to fix the wording so this doesn't happen any more? Why has there been 3 years of controversy over this play? Why does every NFL player say it was a catch? Why do the announcers now mock the rule and say "we don't know what a catch is any more?" You have a very different connotation of indisputable than I do. I have never seen definitive evidence that ball ever touched the ground away from the cradle of his arm. There is no evidence at all that it did before his left knee or right elbow, which by rule if there is contact (which the NFL maintains there was) renders the play dead. There is no way a fumble can happen after the ball and play is dead. The only thing indisputable is that your mind is made up, for whatever reason, and I am cool with that, we're all allowed opinions. I just don't see how you can justify yours, and you don't see how I can justify mine, and we can agree to disagree, yes sir. Got way more people on my side and your side is shrinking fast. You might want to reconsider the possibility that you are simply wrong. I have already considered that I am, but there is no evidence to back it.";}, 1520495005, 1606887945
    Run Time: 0.000835
  12. INSERT INTO xf_bb_code_parse_cache
    	(content_type, content_id, parse_tree, cache_version, cache_date)
    VALUES (?, ?, ?, ?, ?)
    ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE parse_tree = VALUES(parse_tree),
    	cache_version = VALUES(cache_version),
    	cache_date = VALUES(cache_date)
    Params: post, 7950996, a:2:{i:0;a:4:{s:3:"tag";s:5:"quote";s:6:"option";s:33:"Hostile, post: 7950321, member: 5";s:8:"original";a:2:{i:0;s:43:"[QUOTE="Hostile, post: 7950321, member: 5"]";i:1;s:8:"[/QUOTE]";}s:8:"children";a:1:{i:0;s:207:"That's easy. If contact was not made, he is a runner by virtue of having taken a 3rd step and diving for the goal line, ground cannot cause a fumble, he was untouched and rolled into the end zone. Touchdown.";}}i:1;s:835:" The scenario I set out was a player goes air born to catch the ball, and who, without being touched, loses the ball immediately upon hitting the ground, and the opposing team recovers the ball. Accordingly, there are no 3 steps, there is no TD because the goal line hasn't been crossed, and since the player hasn't been touched, the ball actually would be a fumble under the rule you propose. For that matter, even if he took the 3 steps and then went to the ground without being touched and lost the ball it would be a fumble. The "ground can't cause a fumble" rule only applies when the player is contacted by the defense, because then it would be a dead ball when he hit the ground. If he isn't touched, the play isn't dead, therefore losing the ball when he hit the ground would be a fumble that either team could recover.";}, 1520495005, 1606887945
    Run Time: 0.000527
  13. INSERT INTO xf_bb_code_parse_cache
    	(content_type, content_id, parse_tree, cache_version, cache_date)
    VALUES (?, ?, ?, ?, ?)
    ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE parse_tree = VALUES(parse_tree),
    	cache_version = VALUES(cache_version),
    	cache_date = VALUES(cache_date)
    Params: post, 7951020, a:2:{i:0;a:4:{s:3:"tag";s:5:"quote";s:6:"option";s:33:"Hostile, post: 7950339, member: 5";s:8:"original";a:2:{i:0;s:43:"[QUOTE="Hostile, post: 7950339, member: 5"]";i:1;s:8:"[/QUOTE]";}s:8:"children";a:1:{i:0;s:1238:"Serious questions...If it is indisputable why is the NFL backtracking and saying it is a catch, and they are going to fix the wording so this doesn't happen any more? Why has there been 3 years of controversy over this play? Why does every NFL player say it was a catch? Why do the announcers now mock the rule and say "we don't know what a catch is any more?" You have a very different connotation of indisputable than I do. I have never seen definitive evidence that ball ever touched the ground away from the cradle of his arm. There is no evidence at all that it did before his left knee or right elbow, which by rule if there is contact (which the NFL maintains there was) renders the play dead. There is no way a fumble can happen after the ball and play is dead. The only thing indisputable is that your mind is made up, for whatever reason, and I am cool with that, we're all allowed opinions. I just don't see how you can justify yours, and you don't see how I can justify mine, and we can agree to disagree, yes sir. Got way more people on my side and your side is shrinking fast. You might want to reconsider the possibility that you are simply wrong. I have already considered that I am, but there is no evidence to back it.";}}i:1;s:165:" The NFL isn't saying it was a catch under the rules, it is saying it should be a catch, and they want to change the rules so that it will be a catch going forward.";}, 1520495005, 1606887945
    Run Time: 0.000782
  14. INSERT INTO xf_bb_code_parse_cache
    	(content_type, content_id, parse_tree, cache_version, cache_date)
    VALUES (?, ?, ?, ?, ?)
    ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE parse_tree = VALUES(parse_tree),
    	cache_version = VALUES(cache_version),
    	cache_date = VALUES(cache_date)
    Params: post, 7952467, a:2:{i:0;a:4:{s:3:"tag";s:5:"quote";s:6:"option";s:33:"Hostile, post: 7950339, member: 5";s:8:"original";a:2:{i:0;s:43:"[QUOTE="Hostile, post: 7950339, member: 5"]";i:1;s:8:"[/QUOTE]";}s:8:"children";a:1:{i:0;s:1238:"Serious questions...If it is indisputable why is the NFL backtracking and saying it is a catch, and they are going to fix the wording so this doesn't happen any more? Why has there been 3 years of controversy over this play? Why does every NFL player say it was a catch? Why do the announcers now mock the rule and say "we don't know what a catch is any more?" You have a very different connotation of indisputable than I do. I have never seen definitive evidence that ball ever touched the ground away from the cradle of his arm. There is no evidence at all that it did before his left knee or right elbow, which by rule if there is contact (which the NFL maintains there was) renders the play dead. There is no way a fumble can happen after the ball and play is dead. The only thing indisputable is that your mind is made up, for whatever reason, and I am cool with that, we're all allowed opinions. I just don't see how you can justify yours, and you don't see how I can justify mine, and we can agree to disagree, yes sir. Got way more people on my side and your side is shrinking fast. You might want to reconsider the possibility that you are simply wrong. I have already considered that I am, but there is no evidence to back it.";}}i:1;s:16:" What Omar said.";}, 1520495005, 1606887945
    Run Time: 0.000468
  15. INSERT INTO xf_bb_code_parse_cache
    	(content_type, content_id, parse_tree, cache_version, cache_date)
    VALUES (?, ?, ?, ?, ?)
    ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE parse_tree = VALUES(parse_tree),
    	cache_version = VALUES(cache_version),
    	cache_date = VALUES(cache_date)
    Params: post, 7953729, a:2:{i:0;a:4:{s:3:"tag";s:5:"quote";s:6:"option";s:35:"OmerV, post: 7951020, member: 38004";s:8:"original";a:2:{i:0;s:45:"[QUOTE="OmerV, post: 7951020, member: 38004"]";i:1;s:8:"[/QUOTE]";}s:8:"children";a:1:{i:0;s:163:"The NFL isn't saying it was a catch under the rules, it is saying it should be a catch, and they want to change the rules so that it will be a catch going forward.";}}i:1;s:95:"Umm, no what they are saying was they made a bad rule change that messed things up and I agree.";}, 1520495005, 1606887945
    Run Time: 0.000807
  16. INSERT INTO xf_bb_code_parse_cache
    	(content_type, content_id, parse_tree, cache_version, cache_date)
    VALUES (?, ?, ?, ?, ?)
    ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE parse_tree = VALUES(parse_tree),
    	cache_version = VALUES(cache_version),
    	cache_date = VALUES(cache_date)
    Params: post, 7953747, a:2:{i:0;a:4:{s:3:"tag";s:5:"quote";s:6:"option";s:35:"OmerV, post: 7950996, member: 38004";s:8:"original";a:2:{i:0;s:45:"[QUOTE="OmerV, post: 7950996, member: 38004"]";i:1;s:8:"[/QUOTE]";}s:8:"children";a:1:{i:0;s:833:"The scenario I set out was a player goes air born to catch the ball, and who, without being touched, loses the ball immediately upon hitting the ground, and the opposing team recovers the ball. Accordingly, there are no 3 steps, there is no TD because the goal line hasn't been crossed, and since the player hasn't been touched, the ball actually would be a fumble under the rule you propose. For that matter, even if he took the 3 steps and then went to the ground without being touched and lost the ball it would be a fumble. The "ground can't cause a fumble" rule only applies when the player is contacted by the defense, because then it would be a dead ball when he hit the ground. If he isn't touched, the play isn't dead, therefore losing the ball when he hit the ground would be a fumble that either team could recover.";}}i:1;s:1598:"I also do not agree with this. It has very little to do with the actual play as it happened and a lot of what if this happened scenarios. Focusing solely on what we know about the play and the rule to overturn a call on the field the officials in this game got it wrong. I have repeatedly been told Shields touched him. If you're now telling me he didn't it goes 100% contrary to the dialogue that has heretofore been circulating. Therefore he would be down as soon as a knee or elbow hit. Therefore the ball is dead and the play is over at that moment. You still can't show me where the ball came out before his knee or elbow hit. You still can't take away the fact his feet hit the ground 3 times. You still can't take away the fact that he had enough control of the football to not only remove a hand away, but to turn and dive. It's like you're expecting me to believe that a football can defy the the very laws of physics. He didn't have it, but it went with him as he dove? How does that work? Is there a tiny string or a magnet that secures the ball to his hand giving the illusion of control that really isn't control? Guys, we're never going to agree on this, and as I said NFL Players and coaches are on my side. I am pretty comfortable in my stance based on that alone, and when common sense is added (2 hands to 1 hand, ball stayed with him) it is clear that you're simply dealing with a fairy tale for no good reason. You both can have the last word. I appreciate the civil dialogue, but there's no need to waste any more time on this discussion. He caught it. End of story for me.";}, 1520495005, 1606887945
    Run Time: 0.000913
  17. INSERT INTO xf_bb_code_parse_cache
    	(content_type, content_id, parse_tree, cache_version, cache_date)
    VALUES (?, ?, ?, ?, ?)
    ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE parse_tree = VALUES(parse_tree),
    	cache_version = VALUES(cache_version),
    	cache_date = VALUES(cache_date)
    Params: post, 7953760, a:2:{i:0;a:4:{s:3:"tag";s:5:"quote";s:6:"option";s:33:"Hostile, post: 7953747, member: 5";s:8:"original";a:2:{i:0;s:43:"[QUOTE="Hostile, post: 7953747, member: 5"]";i:1;s:8:"[/QUOTE]";}s:8:"children";a:1:{i:0;s:1597:"I also do not agree with this. It has very little to do with the actual play as it happened and a lot of what if this happened scenarios. Focusing solely on what we know about the play and the rule to overturn a call on the field the officials in this game got it wrong. I have repeatedly been told Shields touched him. If you're now telling me he didn't it goes 100% contrary to the dialogue that has heretofore been circulating. Therefore he would be down as soon as a knee or elbow hit. Therefore the ball is dead and the play is over at that moment. You still can't show me where the ball came out before his knee or elbow hit. You still can't take away the fact his feet hit the ground 3 times. You still can't take away the fact that he had enough control of the football to not only remove a hand away, but to turn and dive. It's like you're expecting me to believe that a football can defy the the very laws of physics. He didn't have it, but it went with him as he dove? How does that work? Is there a tiny string or a magnet that secures the ball to his hand giving the illusion of control that really isn't control? Guys, we're never going to agree on this, and as I said NFL Players and coaches are on my side. I am pretty comfortable in my stance based on that alone, and when common sense is added (2 hands to 1 hand, ball stayed with him) it is clear that you're simply dealing with a fairy tale for no good reason. You both can have the last word. I appreciate the civil dialogue, but there's no need to waste any more time on this discussion. He caught it. End of story for me.";}}i:1;s:194:" None of this has anything to do with my post. We were talking about the problems that would occur if the rule were changed to where merely having control of the ball was the only requirement.";}, 1520495005, 1606887945
    Run Time: 0.000522
  18. INSERT INTO xf_bb_code_parse_cache
    	(content_type, content_id, parse_tree, cache_version, cache_date)
    VALUES (?, ?, ?, ?, ?)
    ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE parse_tree = VALUES(parse_tree),
    	cache_version = VALUES(cache_version),
    	cache_date = VALUES(cache_date)
    Params: post, 7953762, a:2:{i:0;a:4:{s:3:"tag";s:5:"quote";s:6:"option";s:33:"Hostile, post: 7953729, member: 5";s:8:"original";a:2:{i:0;s:43:"[QUOTE="Hostile, post: 7953729, member: 5"]";i:1;s:8:"[/QUOTE]";}s:8:"children";a:1:{i:0;s:95:"Umm, no what they are saying was they made a bad rule change that messed things up and I agree.";}}i:1;s:97:" You can phrase it however you like, but they did not say the refs made the wrong call with Dez.";}, 1520495005, 1606887945
    Run Time: 0.000877
  19. INSERT INTO xf_bb_code_parse_cache
    	(content_type, content_id, parse_tree, cache_version, cache_date)
    VALUES (?, ?, ?, ?, ?)
    ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE parse_tree = VALUES(parse_tree),
    	cache_version = VALUES(cache_version),
    	cache_date = VALUES(cache_date)
    Params: post, 7955477, a:6:{i:0;a:4:{s:3:"tag";s:5:"quote";s:6:"option";s:35:"OmerV, post: 7953762, member: 38004";s:8:"original";a:2:{i:0;s:45:"[QUOTE="OmerV, post: 7953762, member: 38004"]";i:1;s:8:"[/QUOTE]";}s:8:"children";a:1:{i:0;s:95:"You can phrase it however you like, but they did not say the refs made the wrong call with Dez.";}}i:1;s:276:" They didn’t have to say it and of course they wouldn’t. They’d just change the rule, manipulate some into thinking they didn’t, then eventually change the rule so no one would ever confuse going to the ground as a receiver and going to the ground as a runner again. ";i:2;a:4:{s:3:"tag";s:3:"url";s:6:"option";N;s:8:"original";a:2:{i:0;s:5:"[URL]";i:1;s:6:"[/URL]";}s:8:"children";a:1:{i:0;s:101:"http://www.nfl.com/videos/nfl-network-total-access/0ap2000000246515/Calvin-Johnson-rule-strikes-again";}}i:3;s:1:" ";i:4;a:4:{s:3:"tag";s:4:"user";s:6:"option";s:3:"463";s:8:"original";a:2:{i:0;s:10:"[USER=463]";i:1;s:7:"[/USER]";}s:8:"children";a:1:{i:0;s:11:"@BlindFaith";}}i:5;s:290:" ’s clearly false claim that this rule changed after the 2013 season was the best and worst defense of Blandino’s very clear explanation that supports the fact that they ruled incorrectly in the Dez play. In 2014 a player could complete the process while going to the ground. Dez did.";}, 1520495005, 1606887945
    Run Time: 0.000892
  20. INSERT INTO xf_bb_code_parse_cache
    	(content_type, content_id, parse_tree, cache_version, cache_date)
    VALUES (?, ?, ?, ?, ?)
    ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE parse_tree = VALUES(parse_tree),
    	cache_version = VALUES(cache_version),
    	cache_date = VALUES(cache_date)
    Params: post, 7955504, a:4:{i:0;a:4:{s:3:"tag";s:5:"quote";s:6:"option";s:33:"Hostile, post: 7953747, member: 5";s:8:"original";a:2:{i:0;s:43:"[QUOTE="Hostile, post: 7953747, member: 5"]";i:1;s:8:"[/QUOTE]";}s:8:"children";a:1:{i:0;s:1597:"I also do not agree with this. It has very little to do with the actual play as it happened and a lot of what if this happened scenarios. Focusing solely on what we know about the play and the rule to overturn a call on the field the officials in this game got it wrong. I have repeatedly been told Shields touched him. If you're now telling me he didn't it goes 100% contrary to the dialogue that has heretofore been circulating. Therefore he would be down as soon as a knee or elbow hit. Therefore the ball is dead and the play is over at that moment. You still can't show me where the ball came out before his knee or elbow hit. You still can't take away the fact his feet hit the ground 3 times. You still can't take away the fact that he had enough control of the football to not only remove a hand away, but to turn and dive. It's like you're expecting me to believe that a football can defy the the very laws of physics. He didn't have it, but it went with him as he dove? How does that work? Is there a tiny string or a magnet that secures the ball to his hand giving the illusion of control that really isn't control? Guys, we're never going to agree on this, and as I said NFL Players and coaches are on my side. I am pretty comfortable in my stance based on that alone, and when common sense is added (2 hands to 1 hand, ball stayed with him) it is clear that you're simply dealing with a fairy tale for no good reason. You both can have the last word. I appreciate the civil dialogue, but there's no need to waste any more time on this discussion. He caught it. End of story for me.";}}i:1;s:1:" ";i:2;a:4:{s:3:"tag";s:3:"url";s:6:"option";N;s:8:"original";a:2:{i:0;s:5:"[URL]";i:1;s:6:"[/URL]";}s:8:"children";a:1:{i:0;s:101:"http://www.nfl.com/videos/nfl-network-total-access/0ap2000000246515/Calvin-Johnson-rule-strikes-again";}}i:3;s:48:" They like to avoid this video posted by percy.";}, 1520495005, 1606887945
    Run Time: 0.000589
  21. INSERT INTO xf_bb_code_parse_cache
    	(content_type, content_id, parse_tree, cache_version, cache_date)
    VALUES (?, ?, ?, ?, ?)
    ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE parse_tree = VALUES(parse_tree),
    	cache_version = VALUES(cache_version),
    	cache_date = VALUES(cache_date)
    Params: post, 7955621, a:2:{i:0;a:4:{s:3:"tag";s:5:"quote";s:6:"option";s:34:"Mr_C, post: 7955477, member: 36323";s:8:"original";a:2:{i:0;s:44:"[QUOTE="Mr_C, post: 7955477, member: 36323"]";i:1;s:8:"[/QUOTE]";}s:8:"children";a:5:{i:0;s:275:"They didn’t have to say it and of course they wouldn’t. They’d just change the rule, manipulate some into thinking they didn’t, then eventually change the rule so no one would ever confuse going to the ground as a receiver and going to the ground as a runner again. ";i:1;a:4:{s:3:"tag";s:3:"url";s:6:"option";N;s:8:"original";a:2:{i:0;s:5:"[URL]";i:1;s:6:"[/URL]";}s:8:"children";a:1:{i:0;s:101:"http://www.nfl.com/videos/nfl-network-total-access/0ap2000000246515/Calvin-Johnson-rule-strikes-again";}}i:2;s:1:" ";i:3;a:4:{s:3:"tag";s:4:"user";s:6:"option";s:3:"463";s:8:"original";a:2:{i:0;s:10:"[USER=463]";i:1;s:7:"[/USER]";}s:8:"children";a:1:{i:0;s:11:"@BlindFaith";}}i:4;s:290:" ’s clearly false claim that this rule changed after the 2013 season was the best and worst defense of Blandino’s very clear explanation that supports the fact that they ruled incorrectly in the Dez play. In 2014 a player could complete the process while going to the ground. Dez did.";}}i:1;s:342:" OK, mr_neverreadtherules I'm not going back to 2013 and posting all the rules and comperisons. The rules were clarified and updated. Call that changing or whatever. And I believe, off the top of my head, it was a change in language and the addition of AR15. 95 to call out what can fulfill the time element for a player going to the ground.";}, 1520495005, 1606887945
    Run Time: 0.000803
  22. INSERT INTO xf_bb_code_parse_cache
    	(content_type, content_id, parse_tree, cache_version, cache_date)
    VALUES (?, ?, ?, ?, ?)
    ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE parse_tree = VALUES(parse_tree),
    	cache_version = VALUES(cache_version),
    	cache_date = VALUES(cache_date)
    Params: post, 7955642, a:2:{i:0;a:4:{s:3:"tag";s:5:"quote";s:6:"option";s:34:"Mr_C, post: 7955504, member: 36323";s:8:"original";a:2:{i:0;s:44:"[QUOTE="Mr_C, post: 7955504, member: 36323"]";i:1;s:8:"[/QUOTE]";}s:8:"children";a:2:{i:0;a:4:{s:3:"tag";s:3:"url";s:6:"option";N;s:8:"original";a:2:{i:0;s:5:"[URL]";i:1;s:6:"[/URL]";}s:8:"children";a:1:{i:0;s:101:"http://www.nfl.com/videos/nfl-network-total-access/0ap2000000246515/Calvin-Johnson-rule-strikes-again";}}i:1;s:48:" They like to avoid this video posted by percy.";}}i:1;s:584:" No, we don't. If he had two feet down before falling, it would have been a catch. And since all he said was have two feet down, you have NO idea of when he meant those two feet had to be down. Unless you actually read the rules where it says that if a player goes to the ground in the act of catching a pass they must maintain possession through contacting the ground. But assuming he meant that as long as he got two feet down at any point fits your narrative, even if that narrative is in direct conflict of the actual rules. But carry on parroting rules you know nothing about.";}, 1520495005, 1606887945
    Run Time: 0.000843
  23. INSERT INTO xf_bb_code_parse_cache
    	(content_type, content_id, parse_tree, cache_version, cache_date)
    VALUES (?, ?, ?, ?, ?)
    ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE parse_tree = VALUES(parse_tree),
    	cache_version = VALUES(cache_version),
    	cache_date = VALUES(cache_date)
    Params: post, 7955693, a:2:{i:0;a:4:{s:3:"tag";s:5:"quote";s:6:"option";s:38:"BlindFaith, post: 7955642, member: 463";s:8:"original";a:2:{i:0;s:48:"[QUOTE="BlindFaith, post: 7955642, member: 463"]";i:1;s:8:"[/QUOTE]";}s:8:"children";a:1:{i:0;s:52:"But carry on parroting rules you know nothing about.";}}i:1;s:35:" A no parrot policy works wonders.";}, 1520495005, 1606887945
    Run Time: 0.000459
  24. INSERT INTO xf_bb_code_parse_cache
    	(content_type, content_id, parse_tree, cache_version, cache_date)
    VALUES (?, ?, ?, ?, ?)
    ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE parse_tree = VALUES(parse_tree),
    	cache_version = VALUES(cache_version),
    	cache_date = VALUES(cache_date)
    Params: post, 7955698, a:2:{i:0;a:4:{s:3:"tag";s:5:"quote";s:6:"option";s:34:"Mr_C, post: 7955477, member: 36323";s:8:"original";a:2:{i:0;s:44:"[QUOTE="Mr_C, post: 7955477, member: 36323"]";i:1;s:8:"[/QUOTE]";}s:8:"children";a:5:{i:0;s:275:"They didn’t have to say it and of course they wouldn’t. They’d just change the rule, manipulate some into thinking they didn’t, then eventually change the rule so no one would ever confuse going to the ground as a receiver and going to the ground as a runner again. ";i:1;a:4:{s:3:"tag";s:3:"url";s:6:"option";N;s:8:"original";a:2:{i:0;s:5:"[URL]";i:1;s:6:"[/URL]";}s:8:"children";a:1:{i:0;s:101:"http://www.nfl.com/videos/nfl-network-total-access/0ap2000000246515/Calvin-Johnson-rule-strikes-again";}}i:2;s:1:" ";i:3;a:4:{s:3:"tag";s:4:"user";s:6:"option";s:3:"463";s:8:"original";a:2:{i:0;s:10:"[USER=463]";i:1;s:7:"[/USER]";}s:8:"children";a:1:{i:0;s:11:"@BlindFaith";}}i:4;s:290:" ’s clearly false claim that this rule changed after the 2013 season was the best and worst defense of Blandino’s very clear explanation that supports the fact that they ruled incorrectly in the Dez play. In 2014 a player could complete the process while going to the ground. Dez did.";}}i:1;s:600:" How could they manipulate people into thinking they didn't change the rule when they are publically saying they want to change the rule? As far as whether you could complete the process while going to the ground in 2014, we've talked about that, and I admitted the point on the Calvin Johnson reception you provided (for anyone reading - this isn't THE Calvin Johnson play), so there is no point to be made with me about that. As for whether Dez completed the process while going to the ground, I understand why Blandino said he didn't, so you and I will have to agree to disagree on that point.";}, 1520495005, 1606887945
    Run Time: 0.000792
  25. INSERT INTO xf_bb_code_parse_cache
    	(content_type, content_id, parse_tree, cache_version, cache_date)
    VALUES (?, ?, ?, ?, ?)
    ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE parse_tree = VALUES(parse_tree),
    	cache_version = VALUES(cache_version),
    	cache_date = VALUES(cache_date)
    Params: post, 7955882, a:2:{i:0;a:4:{s:3:"tag";s:5:"quote";s:6:"option";s:40:"MarcusRock, post: 7955693, member: 35939";s:8:"original";a:2:{i:0;s:50:"[QUOTE="MarcusRock, post: 7955693, member: 35939"]";i:1;s:8:"[/QUOTE]";}s:8:"children";a:1:{i:0;s:33:"A no parrot policy works wonders.";}}i:1;s:49:" Yes, I need to be more stringent on that policy.";}, 1520495005, 1606887945
    Run Time: 0.000772
  26. INSERT INTO xf_bb_code_parse_cache
    	(content_type, content_id, parse_tree, cache_version, cache_date)
    VALUES (?, ?, ?, ?, ?)
    ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE parse_tree = VALUES(parse_tree),
    	cache_version = VALUES(cache_version),
    	cache_date = VALUES(cache_date)
    Params: post, 7956265, a:2:{i:0;a:4:{s:3:"tag";s:5:"quote";s:6:"option";s:38:"BlindFaith, post: 7955642, member: 463";s:8:"original";a:2:{i:0;s:48:"[QUOTE="BlindFaith, post: 7955642, member: 463"]";i:1;s:8:"[/QUOTE]";}s:8:"children";a:1:{i:0;s:583:"No, we don't. If he had two feet down before falling, it would have been a catch. And since all he said was have two feet down, you have NO idea of when he meant those two feet had to be down. Unless you actually read the rules where it says that if a player goes to the ground in the act of catching a pass they must maintain possession through contacting the ground. But assuming he meant that as long as he got two feet down at any point fits your narrative, even if that narrative is in direct conflict of the actual rules. But carry on parroting rules you know nothing about.";}}i:1;s:952:" “He did not have both feet down prior to reaching for the goaline” Dean Blandino referring to that play. You’re showing you didn’t even watch the play. Or you’re in denial because it clearly proves you wrong. Pay attention. He was “going to the ground in the process of making the catch” one of his first lines in the video. He was very clearly going to the ground the entire time. He was never upright at all. Not close to as upright as Dez was. Even an imbecile could see that. Despite him “going to the ground in the process of making the catch”, as Blandino says, he says he could’ve competed the process had he gotten the two feet down “PRIOR TO THE REACH”. Not lunge. Not gather. Not brace. REACH. This is why The Idiot keeps reapeating herself and warning you all not to answer and that’s evidence that It’s clear to even a true moron that what Blandino says contradicts every point your side is trying to make";}, 1520495005, 1606887945
    Run Time: 0.000557
  27. INSERT INTO xf_bb_code_parse_cache
    	(content_type, content_id, parse_tree, cache_version, cache_date)
    VALUES (?, ?, ?, ?, ?)
    ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE parse_tree = VALUES(parse_tree),
    	cache_version = VALUES(cache_version),
    	cache_date = VALUES(cache_date)
    Params: post, 7956278, a:2:{i:0;a:4:{s:3:"tag";s:5:"quote";s:6:"option";s:38:"BlindFaith, post: 7955621, member: 463";s:8:"original";a:2:{i:0;s:48:"[QUOTE="BlindFaith, post: 7955621, member: 463"]";i:1;s:8:"[/QUOTE]";}s:8:"children";a:1:{i:0;s:341:"OK, mr_neverreadtherules I'm not going back to 2013 and posting all the rules and comperisons. The rules were clarified and updated. Call that changing or whatever. And I believe, off the top of my head, it was a change in language and the addition of AR15. 95 to call out what can fulfill the time element for a player going to the ground.";}}i:1;s:287:" You can post the comparisons. That will be interesting. Haven’t you been so against others(any person that can read and compare words) saying the rules changed in 2015? Glad you caught yourself and said clarified. Show me the clarification. Mrcantlistentoenglishfromblandinomyhero";}, 1520495005, 1606887945
    Run Time: 0.000973
  28. INSERT INTO xf_bb_code_parse_cache
    	(content_type, content_id, parse_tree, cache_version, cache_date)
    VALUES (?, ?, ?, ?, ?)
    ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE parse_tree = VALUES(parse_tree),
    	cache_version = VALUES(cache_version),
    	cache_date = VALUES(cache_date)
    Params: post, 7956304, a:2:{i:0;a:4:{s:3:"tag";s:5:"quote";s:6:"option";s:35:"OmerV, post: 7955698, member: 38004";s:8:"original";a:2:{i:0;s:45:"[QUOTE="OmerV, post: 7955698, member: 38004"]";i:1;s:8:"[/QUOTE]";}s:8:"children";a:1:{i:0;s:598:"How could they manipulate people into thinking they didn't change the rule when they are publically saying they want to change the rule? As far as whether you could complete the process while going to the ground in 2014, we've talked about that, and I admitted the point on the Calvin Johnson reception you provided (for anyone reading - this isn't THE Calvin Johnson play), so there is no point to be made with me about that. As for whether Dez completed the process while going to the ground, I understand why Blandino said he didn't, so you and I will have to agree to disagree on that point.";}}i:1;s:385:" Some idiots, not you, on here have been making the argument that the rules didn’t change in 2015. They’re have trouble with simple word comparison. What did Blandino say about the Dez catch that was made it different than the Johnson catch? What did Calvin do that Dez didn’t? The fact you try to answer this shows you are being honest about the debate and I appreciate that.";}, 1520495005, 1606887945
    Run Time: 0.000493
  29. INSERT INTO xf_bb_code_parse_cache
    	(content_type, content_id, parse_tree, cache_version, cache_date)
    VALUES (?, ?, ?, ?, ?)
    ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE parse_tree = VALUES(parse_tree),
    	cache_version = VALUES(cache_version),
    	cache_date = VALUES(cache_date)
    Params: post, 7956312, a:2:{i:0;a:4:{s:3:"tag";s:5:"quote";s:6:"option";s:40:"MarcusRock, post: 7955693, member: 35939";s:8:"original";a:2:{i:0;s:50:"[QUOTE="MarcusRock, post: 7955693, member: 35939"]";i:1;s:8:"[/QUOTE]";}s:8:"children";a:1:{i:0;s:33:"A no parrot policy works wonders.";}}i:1;s:156:" Weak. Very weak. :laugh: We know what I made you for do. Stay of this “man”part of the conversation. This isn’t childish semantics. It’s for men.";}, 1520495005, 1606887945
    Run Time: 0.000786

Included Files (91, XenForo Classes: 61)

  1. index.php
  2. library/XenForo/Autoloader.php
  3. library/XenForo/Application.php
  4. library/Zend/Registry.php
  5. library/Lgpl/utf8.php
  6. library/Zend/Config.php
  7. library/config.php
  8. library/XenForo/FrontController.php
  9. library/XenForo/Dependencies/Public.php
  10. library/XenForo/Dependencies/Abstract.php
  11. library/Zend/Controller/Request/Http.php
  12. library/Zend/Controller/Request/Abstract.php
  13. library/Zend/Uri.php
  14. library/Zend/Controller/Response/Http.php
  15. library/Zend/Controller/Response/Abstract.php
  16. library/XenForo/Model/DataRegistry.php
  17. library/XenForo/Model.php
  18. library/Zend/Db.php
  19. library/Zend/Db/Adapter/Mysqli.php
  20. library/Zend/Db/Adapter/Abstract.php
  21. library/Zend/Db/Select.php
  22. library/Zend/Db/Expr.php
  23. library/Zend/Db/Profiler.php
  24. library/Zend/Db/Statement/Mysqli.php
  25. library/Zend/Db/Statement.php
  26. library/Zend/Db/Statement/Interface.php
  27. library/Zend/Db/Profiler/Query.php
  28. library/XenForo/CodeEvent.php
  29. library/XenForo/Options.php
  30. library/XenForo/Link.php
  31. library/XenForo/Template/Helper/Core.php
  32. library/XenForo/Router.php
  33. library/XenForo/Route/Filter.php
  34. library/XenForo/Route/Interface.php
  35. library/XenForo/Route/ResponseSuffix.php
  36. library/XenForo/Route/Prefix.php
  37. library/XenForo/Route/Prefix/Threads.php
  38. library/XenForo/RouteMatch.php
  39. library/XenForo/ControllerPublic/Thread.php
  40. library/XenForo/ControllerPublic/Abstract.php
  41. library/XenForo/Controller.php
  42. library/SV/PostFloodTweaks/Listener.php
  43. library/SV/PostFloodTweaks/XenForo/ControllerPublic/Thread.php
  44. library/XenForo/Input.php
  45. library/XenForo/Session.php
  46. library/XenForo/Helper/Ip.php
  47. library/XenForo/Visitor.php
  48. library/XenForo/Model/User.php
  49. library/XenForo/Permission.php
  50. library/XenForo/Helper/Php.php
  51. library/XenForo/Phrase.php
  52. library/XenForo/Locale.php
  53. library/XenForo/ControllerHelper/ForumThreadPost.php
  54. library/XenForo/ControllerHelper/Abstract.php
  55. library/SV/PostFloodTweaks/XenForo/ControllerHelper/ForumThreadPost.php
  56. library/XenForo/Model/Thread.php
  57. library/XenForo/Model/Forum.php
  58. library/XenForo/Helper/String.php
  59. library/XenForo/Helper/Discussion.php
  60. library/XenForo/Model/Post.php
  61. library/XenForo/Model/Attachment.php
  62. library/XenForo/Model/Node.php
  63. library/XenForo/Route/Prefix/Categories.php
  64. library/XenForo/Route/Prefix/Forums.php
  65. library/XenForo/ControllerResponse/View.php
  66. library/XenForo/ControllerResponse/Abstract.php
  67. library/XenForo/Helper/Cookie.php
  68. library/XenForo/ViewRenderer/HtmlPublic.php
  69. library/XenForo/ViewRenderer/Abstract.php
  70. library/XenForo/Template/Public.php
  71. library/XenForo/Template/Abstract.php
  72. library/XenForo/ViewPublic/Thread/View.php
  73. library/XenForo/ViewPublic/Base.php
  74. library/XenForo/View.php
  75. library/XenForo/BbCode/Parser.php
  76. library/XenForo/BbCode/Formatter/Base.php
  77. library/XenForo/ViewPublic/Helper/Message.php
  78. library/XenForo/BbCode/TextWrapper.php
  79. library/Dark/TaigaChat/EventListener/Listener.php
  80. library/Siropu/CustomTabs/Listener.php
  81. library/XenForo/Route/Prefix/Members.php
  82. library/Dark/TaigaChat/EventListener/NavigationTabs.php
  83. library/Siropu/CustomTabs/Model.php
  84. library/Siropu/CustomTabs/Helper.php
  85. library/XenForo/Helper/Criteria.php
  86. library/CTA/CDtimer/Listener.php
  87. library/XenForo/Route/Prefix/Posts.php
  88. library/XenForo/Model/Avatar.php
  89. library/CowboysZone/SelectAdNetwork.php
  90. library/XenForo/Debug.php
  91. library/XenForo/ViewRenderer/Json.php