I really dont want to get into long discussions about play calling and route designs, as so much can zig when you zag...its made to be purposefully complicated and posters just talk in circles when you question things....
Can anyone explain to me, briefly, the X, Y, Z assignments in football...and why they have to remain distinguished so much?
Im listening to a Brouadus(dont like him, provide better content on a regular. tell me youre an insider and prove it that his info is whack...or shut up...your lame) and Jeff Cavanaugh discuss compliments to Lamb in this draft. They arent talking about whats possible in the draft....just which WR's would work here...
My head is spinning with "is all this a bunch of mumbo jumbo to complicate things?"
I can understand having 1 guy be like Randy Moss. Stretches the field, tall, stresses out the defenses....but I dont get understand AT ALL an owner or any other GM's decision to pass on a play maker because he will take catches away from an elite paid Lamb. AT ALL.
IF this is how the NFL works..."its about not looking stupid with your money, I paid Lamb and I want him catching all the passes. Im not drafting another stud like Burden to make me look like I spent unwisely"
if this is the current state of NFL...im still watching but its lame.
I see Broadus and Jeff discussing Burden as if he might not be a good fit because of Lamb. I dont get it.
I will use the current NBA Playoffs as case study....all the teams play small ball 5 out at the end of games. Talented guys. Not one trick ponies like a Moss. They go talent when it matters.
why would an NFL club pass on a talented WR over ancient X Y Z structure that might not gell with their current star? bueller? wouldnt you want all 3 receivers being studs...not just one guy labeled a slot guy that can do things?
Again...I get one tall guy that can stretch the field/red zone bully...but other than that...i dont understand x y z structure at all. Put receivers on the field that are versatile, like NBA teams move to late game in Playoffs.
Makes no sense to me at all unless Lamb has a mandatory target percentage in his contract that we dont know about.