I hate the Pressure stat the most

wrongway

Well-Known Member
Messages
794
Reaction score
961
The stat I hate the most. The participation trophy for defensive lineman. Well you almost got there, here's a sticker. If it doesn't lead to a negative offensive play it's worthless. That is all.
 
This is sort of a weird thread to make after Cowboys beat the Saints. I think we only sacked Brees twice, but he was definitely affected by the pressure. That int at the end was caused by pressure.
 
I somewhat agree, if the pressure results in ac negative play, turnover, incomplete pass, etc. It should be counted, otherwise as x you said it is a useless stat..
 
This is sort of a weird thread to make after Cowboys beat the Saints. I think we only sacked Brees twice, but he was definitely affected by the pressure. That int at the end was caused by pressure.
Pressure, indeed, matters. It means the passer was affected. It doesn't mean that the pass is always incomplete/ intercepted, but more often than not it has a negative effect for the offense.
 
There was at least one play I recall where they had Brees for a sack but failed to wrap him up. He then stepped up and completed a pass to keep a drive alive, which was indeed bad. Overall though, it's really hard to criticize the defense this game because they in fact won it.
 
The stat I hate the most. The participation trophy for defensive lineman. Well you almost got there, here's a sticker. If it doesn't lead to a negative offensive play it's worthless. That is all.
Pressure.....remove head from rectum.

Did you NOT SEE what it did to one of the best QB's in football?

Psssst...If the screen is black.....the telly isn't on.
 
The stat I hate the most. The participation trophy for defensive lineman. Well you almost got there, here's a sticker. If it doesn't lead to a negative offensive play it's worthless. That is all.
What exactly do you say to someone who doesn't have the slightest understanding of how pressure affects the QB?

If anything, it's the opposite. Consistent pressure is much more important than counting sacks. So, looks like the OP has it backwards!!!!
 
This is sort of a weird thread to make after Cowboys beat the Saints. I think we only sacked Brees twice, but he was definitely affected by the pressure. That int at the end was caused by pressure.
Like I said if the pressure results in negative offensive play.... Joe Montana was pressured on "the catch" didn't work out to well much to my dismay.
 
There was at least one play I recall where they had Brees for a sack but failed to wrap him up. He then stepped up and completed a pass to keep a drive alive, which was indeed bad. Overall though, it's really hard to criticize the defense this game because they in fact won it.
Not criticising defense at all. Just random thoughts
 
What exactly do you say to someone who doesn't have the slightest understanding of how pressure affects the QB?

If anything, it's the opposite. Consistent pressure is much more important than counting sacks. So, looks like the OP has it backwards!!!!
What exactly do you say to someone who doesn't have the slightest understanding of how pressure affects the QB?

If anything, it's the opposite. Consistent pressure is much more important than counting sacks. So, looks like the OP has it backwards!!!!
If a qb qteps up in pocket avoiding outside pressure delivering strike to receiver for first down said pressure was worthless! Sorry if you can't grasp that. Now if you wanna say constantly driven into the turf after each pass that's different.
 
Pressure.....remove head from rectum.

Did you NOT SEE what it did to one of the best QB's in football?

Psssst...If the screen is black.....the telly isn't on.
Got a lot of those participation trophy's do ya? Good for you
 
If a qb qteps up in pocket avoiding outside pressure delivering strike to receiver for first down said pressure was worthless! Sorry if you can't grasp that. Now if you wanna say constantly driven into the turf after each pass that's different.
What you're failing to grasp is that if you can consistently get into the QB's face, you will affect how he plays. You do not have to drive him into the turf to affect him.
 
Man, you really aren't getting it. I take it you're a youngster?
Nope, I see clearly.
Man, you really aren't getting it. I take it you're a youngster?
Youngsters / millennials love participation trophy's. Should have been a clue. I get it just fine. You think getting close is good. I wonder what Lombardi, Landry, Noll would prefer.
 

Staff online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
474,003
Messages
14,505,658
Members
24,207
Latest member
TomGiantsfan
Back
Top