I agree with everything you said, but the part about him going for the ball. I laughed when Sherman said he was just going for the ball. I've watched a ton of football games in my life and have seen about a million FGs and extra points. In every one of those when a player is trying to block the kick he sticks his arms out to knock the ball down. Sherman didn't stick stick his hands out and showed no effort to block the kick. He led with his helmet and shoulder right at the kicker's knee. Even the angle that he came into the kicker on makes it impossible to block the kick and he didn't even pretend to extend his arms or his hands to block the ball. From my perspective he looked like he had a free shot at the kicker and took it. he knew he was offsides and he could have let up and not injured the guy. But since he didn't hear a whistle he led with his shoulder and head right into the guy's leg. I agree he played it right by football standards but by moral standards that was dirty.I can't really fault Sherman on that. He was offsides yes, but a smart football player doesn't stop just because they were offsides. The officials didn't stop the play. And Sherman went after the ball not the kicker. I don't see how that is roughing the kicker anymore than being offsides on a normal play and still going and tackling the QB so he doesn't launch the ball to the endzone on a free play (ala Rodgers).
The rules are pretty silly that the injured player would have to miss a play when the other team commits a penalty, but Sherman played it like he should have (beyond jumping offsides). The officials further bungled it with their not resetting the playclock.
He'd have all of north Texas coming after him if he went after our PK.Who roughs up a place kicker? Really Seattle? What's Sherman going to do next? Try and take out one of the cheerleaders knees. That'll impress everyone. LOB lowering themselves to taking cheap shots at PK now.
It was garden variety roughing - there was nothing "incidental" about his contact with the kicker and the play was clearly dead by his own off sides. That * * * gets away with tons of contact penalties, why should this be any different?I agree with everything you said, but the part about him going for the ball. I laughed when Sherman said he was just going for the ball. I've watched a ton of football games in my life and have seen about a million FGs and extra points. In every one of those when a player is trying to block the kick he sticks his arms out to knock the ball down. Sherman didn't stick stick his hands out and showed no effort to block the kick. He led with his helmet and shoulder right at the kicker's knee. Even the angle that he came into the kicker on makes it impossible to block the kick and he didn't even pretend to extend his arms or his hands to block the ball. From my perspective he looked like he had a free shot at the kicker and took it. he knew he was offsides and he could have let up and not injured the guy. But since he didn't hear a whistle he led with his shoulder and head right into the guy's leg. I agree he played it right by football standards but by moral standards that was dirty.
I agree with everything you said, but the part about him going for the ball. I laughed when Sherman said he was just going for the ball. I've watched a ton of football games in my life and have seen about a million FGs and extra points. In every one of those when a player is trying to block the kick he sticks his arms out to knock the ball down. Sherman didn't stick stick his hands out and showed no effort to block the kick. He led with his helmet and shoulder right at the kicker's knee. Even the angle that he came into the kicker on makes it impossible to block the kick and he didn't even pretend to extend his arms or his hands to block the ball. From my perspective he looked like he had a free shot at the kicker and took it. he knew he was offsides and he could have let up and not injured the guy. But since he didn't hear a whistle he led with his shoulder and head right into the guy's leg. I agree he played it right by football standards but by moral standards that was dirty.
Get better day by day, I like Jason G approachyou guys and SB thoughts,,
not even going there yet,,
heads on Pitt this weekend, in their house.
its exactly the angle you'd take if you have to reach back to block the kick because you over ran it. Refs should have blown it dead, they didn't. What was he supposed to do, run on by and let him kick it?It's not the angle you take if you're trying to block the kick. Plain and simple. I've never seen someone launch himself over top of the placement and into the kicker's knees/thighs. That's just indefensible, imo.
I also thought that Graham's TD should have received a lot closer scrutiny than it evidently did. I'm not saying there was enough to overturn the call, but there may have been... if you could synchronize the opposite camera views side-by-side and raise the brightness and contrast to see what's going on underneath him with the ball, I thought there was just a moment there where the nose of the ball was certainly scraping the ground. I think he got away with one myself.
why would he stick his arms out to block a kick that he knows isn't going to be where it would normally be?I agree with everything you said, but the part about him going for the ball. I laughed when Sherman said he was just going for the ball. I've watched a ton of football games in my life and have seen about a million FGs and extra points. In every one of those when a player is trying to block the kick he sticks his arms out to knock the ball down. Sherman didn't stick stick his hands out and showed no effort to block the kick. He led with his helmet and shoulder right at the kicker's knee. Even the angle that he came into the kicker on makes it impossible to block the kick and he didn't even pretend to extend his arms or his hands to block the ball. From my perspective he looked like he had a free shot at the kicker and took it. he knew he was offsides and he could have let up and not injured the guy. But since he didn't hear a whistle he led with his shoulder and head right into the guy's leg. I agree he played it right by football standards but by moral standards that was dirty.
Isn't Seattle the least penalized defense in the league too? I think they're really onto something with the whole "commit holding/interference on every play and dare the officials to call it every time" thing.Seattle getting some home cooking by the refs last night.............wow
I thought only Dallas got raped by the refs
Yeah I said this to a friend earlier. Seems like refs are looking out for them this year. But they kinda have been for a while now if you look it up.All I know, the way it's going Sherman will have a big penalty against us that won't be called.
Dude is getting away with a lot this year.
Me too, I'm already thinking about who we're going to draft at #32Im thinking Superbowl/Draft bruh.
Cool. You're going to the game? That's awesome. Have funThe Patriots are going to destroy the Seahawks Sunday night. And I'm going to witness it first hand.
Well because ...shut up, that why. I'm just playing. You're right. Looking at the different angle and replay that ChildsPlay put up (thanks for putting that up BTW), I see that he was going for the ball so I stand corrected. Watching it live and from the other angle it looked more malicious than it was.why would he stick his arms out to block a kick that he knows isn't going to be where it would normally be?