Beast_from_East
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 30,363
- Reaction score
- 27,548
Personally, I dont really care who plays QB as long as the team wins.
But since this is the most talked about topic on this board right now, who should start, I will give my 2 cents.
I think you let Rush play until he loses, he has earned that amount of respect. Odds are we are going to lose at least one of the next two games at Rams and at Philly. If Dak is fully recovered, you then put him back into the lineup after Rush loses a game.
This is the fairest thing for everybody involved. Rush gets to play until he loses a game, you are not sitting an undefeated QB, and its fair to Dak as well because we all know the chit storm it would cause if you sit an undefeated Rush and play Dak coming back from injury and he looks awful. First thing you would hear is "I told you guys Dak sucked, he should have never been put back in the lineup because Rush is a 1000 better".
You guys know this will be the narrative if Rush sits with a 3-0 or 4-0 record and Dak is 0-2.
But since this is the most talked about topic on this board right now, who should start, I will give my 2 cents.
I think you let Rush play until he loses, he has earned that amount of respect. Odds are we are going to lose at least one of the next two games at Rams and at Philly. If Dak is fully recovered, you then put him back into the lineup after Rush loses a game.
This is the fairest thing for everybody involved. Rush gets to play until he loses a game, you are not sitting an undefeated QB, and its fair to Dak as well because we all know the chit storm it would cause if you sit an undefeated Rush and play Dak coming back from injury and he looks awful. First thing you would hear is "I told you guys Dak sucked, he should have never been put back in the lineup because Rush is a 1000 better".
You guys know this will be the narrative if Rush sits with a 3-0 or 4-0 record and Dak is 0-2.