While I agree that he will be gone, I have to disagree that they couldn't use him. The guy would allow the Cowboys to go with two te sets on all three downs, making teams respect the run at all times or pay the consequences. While he and Witten would be very difficult to handle in the passing game. This is actually the type of offense Parcells would love to employ.stilltheguru said:zzzzzzzzzzzz.
he'll be gone in the first 8 pics and plus like u said we have witten.why put davis in as a 3rd wideout?
should'nt we just get chad jackson,a real wideout?lol
I'm hoping for Jackson or Lawson if not then trade down and get Wimberlyspeedkilz88 said:While I agree that he will be gone, I have to disagree that they couldn't use him. The guy would allow the Cowboys to go with two te sets on all three downs, making teams respect the run at all times or pay the consequences. While he and Witten would be very difficult to handle in the passing game. This is actually the type of offense Parcells would love to employ.
I do like Chad Jackson though. Jackson, Lawson, Wimberly, or Carpenter look like logical picks in the first for the Cowboys.
i agree with both of those too those are my top three besides the obvious top ten . id take lawson before jackson and davis but i KNOW hell be gone.Natedawg44 said:I'm hoping for Jackson or Lawson if not then trade down and get Wimberly
stilltheguru said:ware>>merrimen.take that and swallow it
You think Tom couldn't start for the Cardinals?SkinsandTerps said:Really, proven by what exactly ?
As far as Davis coming to Dallas, there is a better chance of Tom Brady becoming the 2006 starting QB for the Cardinals.
Hostile said:You think Tom couldn't start for the Cardinals?
:wink2: