Reverend Conehead
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 9,953
- Reaction score
- 11,858
However, I was outraged to learn it's not historically accurate.
That's too bad. Which part?However, I was outraged to learn it's not historically accurate.
That's too bad. Which part?
Oh man, I hate when they get the easy stuff wrong. That's just lazy.The type of crucifix that Lincoln carried to scare off vampires was from the 20th century. The one Lincoln used in his vampire hunts was completely different.
However, I was outraged to learn it's not historically accurate.
Well when I studied Lincoln I know they showed the type of AXE he really used and that is not the one. So now we know two parts of the movie are not true historical facts.The type of crucifix that Lincoln carried to scare off vampires was from the 20th century. The one Lincoln used in his vampire hunts was completely different.
Well when I studied Lincoln I know they showed the type of AXE he really used and that is not the one. So now we know two parts of the movie are not true historical facts.
Well at least the movie had the facts right about the Vampires.Yup, they also left out the part where Mary Todd Lincoln got mad at him for hunting vampires and demanded that he stop. She even went so far as to have an affair with Thaddeus Stephens to make him jealous and stop hunting vampires, but Lincoln was too stubborn. Man, I hate it when movies get their facts wrong.
I don't know of anyone who's actually seen a vampire, and I've never seen any proof that they exist. I guess we can assume he got them all.
What they didn't sparkle?Well at least the movie had the facts right about the Vampires.