I think its a bigger need.. We got slim pickings behind Shultz..
Vinnie2u Well-Known Member Messages 7,769 Reaction score 11,176 Apr 29, 2022 #1 I think its a bigger need.. We got slim pickings behind Shultz..
quickccc Well-Known Member Messages 16,162 Reaction score 14,051 Apr 29, 2022 #2 player value. i'm Not for taking taking a TE, just for the sake of taking one. He'd have to be special and worth taking over a valued WR.
player value. i'm Not for taking taking a TE, just for the sake of taking one. He'd have to be special and worth taking over a valued WR.
The Realist Well-Known Member Messages 5,504 Reaction score 2,027 Apr 29, 2022 #3 I would take Pickens, Watson and Tolbert before TE but after that TE better than the WR’s.
cnuball21 Well-Known Member Messages 11,215 Reaction score 9,324 Apr 29, 2022 #4 A lot of solid mid round TE options. Taking one in the 2nd would be incredibly stupid.
RodeoJake Well-Known Member Messages 3,905 Reaction score 6,873 Apr 29, 2022 #5 I'd take a TE in the 3rd, if we're using a 3rd we get in trade for Schultz.
JPM Well-Known Member Messages 6,262 Reaction score 1,135 Apr 29, 2022 #6 I'm hoping for a DT in round 2.
Dalmations202 Well-Known Member Messages 1,378 Reaction score 879 Apr 29, 2022 #7 cnuball21 said: A lot of solid mid round TE options. Taking one in the 2nd would be incredibly stupid. Click to expand... I really dislike agreeing with you but you are correct here IMO. DT, DE, LB, even OG so TSmith can focus on OT would be a better option than TE in the second, and I am a huge advocate of a better TE. I am hoping DT.
cnuball21 said: A lot of solid mid round TE options. Taking one in the 2nd would be incredibly stupid. Click to expand... I really dislike agreeing with you but you are correct here IMO. DT, DE, LB, even OG so TSmith can focus on OT would be a better option than TE in the second, and I am a huge advocate of a better TE. I am hoping DT.