I Would Take A Tight End. Before Taking A Wide Receiver

player value.

i'm Not for taking taking a TE, just for the sake of taking one.
He'd have to be special and worth taking over a valued WR.
 
I would take Pickens, Watson and Tolbert before TE but after that TE better than the WR’s.
 
I'd take a TE in the 3rd, if we're using a 3rd we get in trade for Schultz.
 
A lot of solid mid round TE options. Taking one in the 2nd would be incredibly stupid.
I really dislike agreeing with you but you are correct here IMO.

DT, DE, LB, even OG so TSmith can focus on OT would be a better option than TE in the second, and I am a huge advocate of a better TE.

I am hoping DT.
 

Staff online

  • Sarge
    Red, White and Brew...

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
465,498
Messages
13,879,078
Members
23,791
Latest member
mashburn
Back
Top