If Dak is playable and on the field, he produces

CCBoy

CCBoy

Well-Known Member
Messages
48,596
Reaction score
23,241
If he is playable and on the field, he produces. While playing, he nor could Romo or anyone turn it all around by being stacked 5 times a game for extended periods. He was MPV runner up when he could scramble a lot, and not limited by injuries.

His protection and the run blocking have to improve.

Another top receiver to push potentials to high production levels requires a producing 2nd receiver. No one on roster looks to step up but just in a member of group level. To push defense back, a cheaper drafted receiver is needed. Not a quiet the crowd noise free agent. Target a receiver with elite speed and plug him into the offense for five years.

Cost effect improves and a reliable game day solution that hits the carpet.

The running back roster is just weak. That talent level needs a true injection that will keep opponent linebackers on their heels. Offense wins games now and so does productive passing. Both offensive tackles have to pass block and this not a convience, further. Here and now or bring back Smith for an only immediate use. He would be a band aide last resort remedy.

No, it's not Dak. They have to be led and accountability still flows from the top. Real problems have to still be solved on the level of the problems. Not name calling and 30 year old calendars.
 
The defense can still resign with available talent, their strong defensive and good players. LB, DE, CB, and DL. There are now funds for this level stability. The direction of this unit will be stable and improving with the basis of attack now and the new leadership. There are Day 2 level talents that actually will add to the talent pool, lower costs due to youth, and continue adding the new system's face. That takes transitioning effects anyway.
 
Why do people keep touting 'MVP runner up' as some sort of accomplishment? No one ever remembers second place (except Dakstans, of course). Second place is always forgotten very quickly.

Aaron Rodgers won MVP in 2020, can you tell me who came in second? Nope, and no one cares.
 
acr731 said:
Why do people keep touting 'MVP runner up' as some sort of accomplishment? No one ever remembers second place (except Dakstans, of course). Second place is always forgotten very quickly.

Aaron Rodgers won MVP in 2020, can you tell me who came in second? Nope, and no one cares.
Click to expand...
Because that level of play is current levels of achievement and in the real world of the NFL.

For some who do their homework, that is first, a lie about achieved achievement.
Organizational skills keep up. Does one want your bank to just tell you your top income is doing OK? :thumbdown:

Just own the reasons for problems, PROBLEMS, aren't unsolvable.

Prescott is far from non adaptable as is the team he plays on.

That all you got from the OP?
 
Last edited:
acr731 said:
Why do people keep touting 'MVP runner up' as some sort of accomplishment? No one ever remembers second place (except Dakstans, of course). Second place is always forgotten very quickly.

Aaron Rodgers won MVP in 2020, can you tell me who came in second? Nope, and no one cares.
Click to expand...
Funny how that seems to be the one and only 'almost' that means anything.
 
acr731 said:
Why do people keep touting 'MVP runner up' as some sort of accomplishment? No one ever remembers second place (except Dakstans, of course). Second place is always forgotten very quickly.

Aaron Rodgers won MVP in 2020, can you tell me who came in second? Nope, and no one cares.
Click to expand...
They'll tell you Dak is better than Super Bowl Champion AND fellow MVP runner-up Jalen Hurts also.

Dak fans are crazy people. I'm glad there are not many at all left.

Cowboys fans will win out over the Dak fans in the end. Their numbers are dwindling by the year.

Dak will never play a full season again, so I think last year was the last time we see Dak fans go 100% for him.

What we see now is weak grasping at straw attempts to defend their guy, but he's a loser and losers lose, so he will hurt them again next season.
 
CCBoy said:
If he is playable and on the field, he produces. While playing, he nor could Romo or anyone turn it all around by being stacked 5 times a game for extended periods. He was MPV runner up when he could scramble a lot, and not limited by injuries.

His protection and the run blocking have to improve.

Another top receiver to push potentials to high production levels requires a producing 2nd receiver. No one on roster looks to step up but just in a member of group level. To push defense back, a cheaper drafted receiver is needed. Not a quiet the crowd noise free agent. Target a receiver with elite speed and plug him into the offense for five years.

Cost effect improves and a reliable game day solution that hits the carpet.

The running back roster is just weak. That talent level needs a true injection that will keep opponent linebackers on their heels. Offense wins games now and so does productive passing. Both offensive tackles have to pass block and this not a convience, further. Here and now or bring back Smith for an only immediate use. He would be a band aide last resort remedy.

No, it's not Dak. They have to be led and accountability still flows from the top. Real problems have to still be solved on the level of the problems. Not name calling and 30 year old calendars.
Click to expand...
With an effective running game, Dak will be just fine.
 
Vtwin said:
Because they have to.
Click to expand...
MountaineerCowboy said:
They'll tell you Dak is better than Super Bowl Champion AND fellow MVP runner-up Jalen Hurts also.

Dak fans are crazy people. I'm glad there are not many at all left.

Cowboys fans will win out over the Dak fans in the end. Their numbers are dwindling by the year.

Dak will never play a full season again, so I think last year was the last time we see Dak fans go 100% for him.

What we see now is weak grasping at straw attempts to defend their guy, but he's a loser and losers lose, so he will hurt them again next season.
Click to expand...
:lmao: No! Get some coffee.
 
acr731 said:
Do you know why that season is so forgettable? Because the very next season he got paid and had the worst year of career.
Click to expand...
No, this is still a team sport and three straight 12 win seasons.

Posters aren't the New York Post taking popularity posts. That trait landed an incompetant team in the White House.

(coughing loudly)

Now, what season was he injured...look it up.
 
Vtwin said:
Exactly. As evidenced by the consist use of barely achieving second place as some sort of trophy.

Why are you trying to do the wrong thing and thinking it is the right way?
Click to expand...
The point is solving actual problems and not the use of negative labels.

Don't come at me as a person again. :popcorn: :hammer:
 
CCBoy said:
The point is solving actual problems and not the use of negative labels.
Click to expand...
How does you pointing out that the QB barely qualified for consideration as runner-up for a prestigious award work towards solving any actual problems?

Serious question. Educate me.
 
Vtwin said:
How does you pointing out that the QB barely qualified for consideration as runner-up for a prestigious award work towards solving any actual problems?

Serious question. Educate me.
Click to expand...
That is self serving and not an extension of debate. The OP is already presented. Read it. I spoke the truth and that is enough. I won't serve as you whipping boy here.

Player of the Year is not the only view of a very good player. Achieved is just that.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Members online

... and 124 more.
Total: 6,568 (members: 224, guests: 6,344)

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
464,111
Messages
13,789,389
Members
23,772
Latest member
BAC2662
Back
Top