Woods
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 12,460
- Reaction score
- 61
committee - at least to a certain extent, couldn't we do this if necessary next year? Philly has gotten away with this as well, probably because they have a very good OL.
First of all, this isn't a TO thread.
But, why not, for example, Glenn, Hurd, Crayton, Miles, and let's say a high draft pick in 2007, plus an experienced veteran WR in FA (not necessarily top tier, but just below).
We could use the cost savings to upgrade Rivera, the FS position, and we could try to add one more pass rusher to the team.
Then, in the draft, we take 1 WR somewhere Day 1, and then we simply take the best player on the draft board.
Is this a viable option?
First of all, this isn't a TO thread.
But, why not, for example, Glenn, Hurd, Crayton, Miles, and let's say a high draft pick in 2007, plus an experienced veteran WR in FA (not necessarily top tier, but just below).
We could use the cost savings to upgrade Rivera, the FS position, and we could try to add one more pass rusher to the team.
Then, in the draft, we take 1 WR somewhere Day 1, and then we simply take the best player on the draft board.
Is this a viable option?