If Peyton Could give Dallas 3 healthy years... Would you?

[Vinnie2u]

Before all the Critics Chime in.. Ignoring the cap money spent on QB's. The crappy defense.. The this ain't Madden comments.. The He can't get along with Garrett crowd. If he's healthy would you want Jerry to go after him?

 

[CowboysFirst]

It depends on how much I could get for Romo in a trade. If I can get 2 firsts or a similar package, I'd do it. The team has so many holes that they won't win anything as currently constructed.

 

[Tricericon]

There's better places to invest resources, I think.

 

[rcaldw]

You won't get two number 1's for Romo. If you could guarantee three healthy years then I would do it, because Peyton is better than Romo, and because 3 years from now and Romo will be on the downside any way.

In reality, I would NOT do this, because Romo is better than a Manning with questionable health, and there is no way you can guarantee that neck. Romo is a pro bowl caliber QB and good enough for us to win.

 

[Romolover32]

1) Romo is not part of our problem.

2) Peyton has a noodle arm right now. There's no guarantee he'll be healthy by week 1.

 

[calico]

Romo and manning put up similar numbers under Garrett IMO , I wouldn't do it at all. And manning hasn't exactly been mr clutch in the playoffs like Tom Brady...

 

[dalboy]

 

[Tusan_Homichi]

We are not a QB away from the Super Bowl. We're a good offensive/defensive line and a good secondary away.

 

[Cowboys&LakersFan]

Wow again seriously?

Romo is NOT the problem for the last time. It's the defense and OL. Fix those and we'll be fine.

 

[Hoofbite]

1) Romo is not part of our problem.

2) Peyton has a noodle arm right now. There's no guarantee he'll be healthy by week 1.

I think the title of the thread specifically mentioned "if he were healthy".

 

[Cowboys&LakersFan]

Romo and manning put up similar numbers under Garrett IMO , I wouldn't do it at all. And manning hasn't exactly been mr clutch in the playoffs like Tom Brady...

Manning is not the reason the Colts have failed in the playoffs recently. It was mostly on his defense and bad coaching.

 

[Dallas]

If Joe Montana were in his prime right now and could give you 5 great years, and Sketchers would let him out of his Shape-up shoe contract, would you pull the trigger over the Peyton Manning for Romo trade?


THAT is something to seriously think about.


Marinate on THAT...hmmm? Crazy stuff tonight....


I got more scenarios if you need some.

 

[Romolover32]

I think the title of the thread specifically mentioned "if he were healthy".

Not sure how he's much of an upgrade over Romo behind this current oline. Peyton is a great QB, but we also have a great one here that fans unfortunately take for granted bc Antonio is just a better scapegoat than Jerrah (who we're stuck with indefinitely) and Redballs.

The intelligence level of Dallas fans is about as mediocre as our record under Jerrah as HC since 1996.

 

[DallasDomination]

I would hate to see Peyton Manning Tarnish his legacy by spending 3 years in Dallas. Retire as a Colt or find a team that has a shot to win Now.

 

[CowboyMike]

You won't get two number 1's for Romo. If you could guarantee three healthy years then I would do it, because Peyton is better than Romo, and because 3 years from now and Romo will be on the downside any way.

In reality, I would NOT do this, because Romo is better than a Manning with questionable health, and there is no way you can guarantee that neck. Romo is a pro bowl caliber QB and good enough for us to win.

The Raiders gave up two firsts for a beat up question mark in Carson Palmer. The 2013 first rounder only became a second rounder because they missed the playoffs.

A team in desperate need of a quarterback would most definitely give up two firsts for Romo, the fourth ranked QB in the league. Washington comes to mind, Shanahan loves Romo, as does Seattle, Cleveland, Miami, and Denver.

 

[Brian_C82]

I can't imagine he would want to compete in the same division as his brother.

 

[SaltwaterServr]

Sure, why not? With the caveat that my Monopoly money is worth the same as legal US tender. Not your Monopoly money either, only mine.

 

[CCBoy]

Sure, why not? With the caveat that my Monopoly money is worth the same as legal US tender. Not your Monopoly money either, only mine.

Sounds as a Japanese/Irish wedding to me...

 

[Chuck 54]

No...

 

[Hostile]

This has to be the 3rd or 4th thread on this topic.