If released in theory. would Dak start elsewhere?

[G2]

With all due respect yes I AM serious!
I em entitled to my opinion and I alwasy respect others´opinions.

I have come to think ME PERSONALLY that Dak IS AVERAGE

Yes, you're entitled to a silly opinion.

 

[Super_Kazuya]

If he would have been available at the start of free agency, perhaps... but who displaces their current starter at this point? I think Bellichick is hell bent on proving a point with their guy.

 

[Tussinman]

If Dak didn't start it wouldn't be because of ability.

It would be team didn't want or have the cap to sign him, they already have a good franchise QB, they just draft a high pick QB in the last couple of years, or they plan on drafting a QB next season

 

[Darkhound]

Hopefully this season happens, Dak plays and we finally see the dud he is

 

[Darkhound]

If he would have been available at the start of free agency, perhaps... but who displaces their current starter at this point? I think Bellichick is hell bent on proving a point with their guy.

This is exactly my point

 

[QuincyCarterEra]

With all due respect yes I AM serious!
I em entitled to my opinion and I alwasy respect others´opinions.

I have come to think ME PERSONALLY that Dak IS AVERAGE

Hey @Darkhound you must have overlooked @OmerV question that he asked you. Make sure to circle back to it.

 

[cowboygo]

Hopefully this season happens, Dak plays and we finally see the dud he is

Why hope for him to fail? SMH

 

[John813]

Good grief people who many Dak threads do you think we need?????????

4 more threads and that should do it, for the next 3 hours.

 

[MWH1967]

In other news @Reality butler just ask. "May I find you some https://encrypted-tbn0.***NOT-ALLOWED***/images?q=tbn%3AANd9GcSeYIO-2oDq8o78DHIBwnKGNgkDfPFjZ8qeEpAB_sAwYkOiT329&usqp=CAU sir"?

 

[Darkhound]

So, there are 32 QB's in the NFL better than Dak?

PAPPY says all the time that Dak is no better than a back up, and at times has said he isn't even worthy of being a Q in the NFL at all. I've asked several times who te 32 better QBs are. I'll ask you the same.

AT this point... i dont think if he were release... he would start on ANY TEAM. I think all teams are set with that they have at QB

 

[Tussinman]

This is exactly my point

Wording of the opening post was a little confusing

The opening post read "Dak is backup in the NFL", not "Dak this late in free agency would probably be a backup given cap and roster decisions that have been made on most teams"

Huge difference

 

[Darkhound]

Then you should of worded your opening post better.

The opening post read "Dak is backup in the NFL", not "Dak this late in free agency would probably be a backup given cap and roster decisions that have been made on most teams"

Huge difference

Well, seeing it that way.. you are right.
But still my point stands. I dont think Dak will be a starter in the near mid future. He will be a good backup.

 

[QuincyCarterEra]

@Darkhound
HEY man are you going to answer the 32 QBs ahead of Dak that would make him a backup?

We are waiting?

If you don't know then you just made a stupid thread.

 

[Corso]

I can't say that I care.

 

[Darkhound]

@Darkhound
HEY man are you going to answer the 32 QBs ahead of Dak that would make him a backup?

We are waiting?

If you don't know then you just made a stupid thread.

I just said IT. I WILL SAY IT AGIAN I personally think that the DAK IS NOT better than ANY of the other current starters at this point.

 

[Super_Kazuya]

Then you should of worded your opening post better.

The opening post read "Dak is backup in the NFL", not "Dak this late in free agency would probably be a backup given cap and roster decisions that have been made on most teams"

Huge difference

Your point is fair but... kinda the same thing? If Aaron Rodgers got released today, somebody would change things up, no?
I guess the concept is if that if the QB musical chairs stopped on Dalton, Winston and Newton so they are now backups, then is Dak also a backup by default? With the recognition that probably all 4 would not be ranked less than 32nd in the league.

 

[HungryLion]

I just said IT. I WILL SAY IT AGIAN I personally think that the DAK IS NOT better than ANY of the other current starters at this point.

 

[Dale]

I realize we all go back and forth on Dak, but I do think some context is warranted here.

Dak was listed as among the top free agents this offseason, including the No. 1 potential free agent on either ESPN or NFL.com.

Would there be a market if we released him tomorrow? Of course there would.

 

[Flamma]

In an absolutely impossible scenario, but I CAN DREAM can I? If Dak gets released will be be the absolute starter in any other team?

What are your thoughts?
Sadly, I think that Dak is a very good BACKUP.

Not this year. But next year where there will probably be a need and openings, most likely yes.

 

[InTheZone]

are we counting another starter being hurt or straight up winning the job?

Unless it's the jags, cardinals, patriots, or browns I don't see him starting. So my answer is yes, he'll start elsewhere, but it'll be a short lived role.