heir
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 591
- Reaction score
- 631
why does it even matter?Was our QB tonight, is the outcome different?
why does it even matter?Was our QB tonight, is the outcome different?
Yeah, just like Romo has been wrong several times about coverages this year as an analyst.Honestly it’s almost disrespectful that people continue to say Dak is better than Romo. Romo could read coverages 100 times better than Dak
Dak just has had the athletic advantage
Was our QB tonight, is the outcome different?
Having the build is one thing,but Tony was an all around athlete..don't forget he starred in basketball also.Tony is my all time favorite cowboy
I hear you but even Tony would acknowledge that Dak has more the athletic build
I agree. Romo and Dak are functionally equivalent. I think Romo peaked in 2007 skill and play making wise. That Giants loss and Jessica Simpson fiasco scarred him.Probably not but both have low ceilings. Talking about two average QBs.
NoWas our QB tonight, is the outcome different?
The problem tonight was the lack of stopping Arizona on 3rd down.Was our QB tonight, is the outcome different?
well dak did have a costly fumble...so that evens it outLove Romo, but he would have thrown at least 1 pick in this game, especially with a non existent running game.
Hell no.Was our QB tonight, is the outcome different?
And what has Dak done? Although better than Dak, Romo wasn’t a SB caliber QB. It’s JJ’s world. We’ll never have one till he’s out of the picture.Romo in his prime couldn't make it past the 1st round in real life. Enough with these living in fantasy land posts...
Hopefully Romo would have also had help form a drop by the D like Dak did.No, not if the rest of the team played like this. Romo maybe throws a pick or two.
No! He’s one of the main reasons were known as a team that ***** the bed at the end of the year.Was our QB tonight, is the outcome different?
Hopefully Romo would have also had help form a drop by the D like Dak did.
No kidding, this loss is clearly more on the offense than the defenseA QB has to be able to win even if the defense can get a turnover…
I was a Romo supporter, but you saw what happened when his Oline and run game sucked even when he had Dez and Witten in their prime. We went 8-8 three 3 straight seasons losing the last win or go home games.
Romo would have tried to play hero ball and maybe got few more big plays but probably would have also thrown few picks.
Actually, Romo has the "athletic advantage" over Dak.; Romo is an elite golfer and was a very good basketball player, in fact he played with Caron Butler on the All-Racine County (Wisconsin) team. He averaged 24 pts./8 rebs./4 ast., per game. But even though Romo is a better athlete, Dak is the better ALL AROUND QB, which is why Romo never got his starting job back once he was healthy.Honestly it’s almost disrespectful that people continue to say Dak is better than Romo. Romo could read coverages 100 times better than Dak
Dak just has had the athletic advantage