If Romo were to play, when would we know?

fanfromvirginia

Inconceivable!
Messages
4,014
Reaction score
164
jesusphreak;1080092 said:
Does Parcells usually announce big changes like this earlier in the week or later?
BP's already announced he's not switching to Romo so this is all, as they say, academic.
 

Ben_n_austin

Benched
Messages
2,898
Reaction score
4
LaTunaNostra;1081006 said:
Quincy and Vinnie also quickly developed 'chemistry' with Terry. Key was supposedly "VT's guy", but in the few short weeks T played with Testaverde before getting injured, VT was singing his praises..and looking for him.

I have no doubt the same would happen with Romo. Because Terry is a player, not a prima donna, and no one overlooks players.

A receiver simply has to be in the right place, and hold onto the ball. It also helps to practice. Then the QB gets on the same page with him.

It's on Owens to prove himself reliable. He got more thrown to him than anyone yesterday..some were poorly thrown balls, but even when the QB launches it flush to a defender, try to make a play on the interceptor, instead of looking all huffy and disgusted.

Bledsoe sucked yesterday, but Owens hasn't looked anything like what he did in Philly.

And it may be he is no longer 'that player'.

Nicely stated.
 

chinch

No Quarter
Messages
3,596
Reaction score
0
LaTunaNostra;1081006 said:
Bledsoe sucked yesterday, but Owens hasn't looked anything like what he did in Philly.

And it may be he is no longer 'that player'.
but in TO's defense he had an injured hammy and a currently a broken hand (metacarpal).

drew has no excuses except for his limited and ever diminishing brainpower :(
 
Top