Line longevity and winning are not synonymous
This team could have the same people start all the games and win all of them or lose all of them or go 8-8 or go 10-6 or go 3-13.
If we started players that have blues eyes only do we win the Super Bowl?.
I don't think the matter of the post was longevity. The point was, thats our best line, and if we have our best line out there for every game, are the pieces around them good enough to take us to the playoffs
I don't think the question is about the skill players. it's whether our best o-linemen are good enough to get the team into the playoffs. Even though our schedule looks like it will be tough, I would say 'yes', but the playoff exit might be immediate and ugly. Kinda depends how well the noobies do and if they're all healthy in Dec/Jan.
Of course, the elephant in the room is, how many of you think this OL makes it through the season without injuries?
I don't think the matter of the post was longevity. The point was, thats our best line, and if we have our best line out there for every game, are the pieces around them good enough to take us to the playoffs
Do we make the playoffs?
...I am interested in see how the combination of Free at guard and Parnell at tackle works out as well. I don't like messing with Free when he appears to be back in a groove, but I will at least acknowledge that starting both of them could give us our strongest line combination (if Leary gets back to replace Bernadeau).
I think we make the playoffs without them all starting every game. If we aren't -13 in TO differential and if we improve our pass defense. I'm starting to feel like a broken record on the topic, but, man, teams make the postseason with mediocre OLs all the time. It's not exactly a high bar to clear.